Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
There we have it.
In an attempt to win brownie points among bleeding-heart North London liberals, while getting to play the statesman on the international stage, Burnham has departed from longstanding British policy while blithely assuming he won’t have to face any practical ramifications.
But there will be ramifications.
A formal apology will involve this country formally accepting responsibility for slavery. Caribbean and African governments will cite the apology as evidence that Britain acknowledges an obligation to address historical harms. It could even lead to legal liability to pay reparations.
Burnham clearly thinks he can help ease his way into the history books with an apology. But as virtue signals go, this may end up being even more expensive than most.
thecritic.co.uk/we-will-pay-…
Burnham fuels reparations fears as he agrees to 'address' and apologise for Britain's slave trade legacy after tense talks with Commonwealth leaders trib.al/Bv1iPpk
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Replying to @Ed_Miliband
Who is following us exactly? Name one other country that has decided to import oil and gas instead of producing its own?
One will do.... We're waiting....
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Thought for the day... 🤔
Imagine how Canada would respond if asked to fund development projects in Mississippi in return for the right to trade more energy with the US.
But something similar is expected as part of the UK-EU 'reset'... 🤷♂️
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
If a hotelier refuses to implement Angela Rayner's holiday tax, they could face 14 YEARS in prison.
That's the same amount of time that Shabir Ahmed, the ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, spent behind bars.
Everything about this is completely despicable.
Tourism is vital to our economy and our communities, and I want to make sure the cultural institutions welcoming millions of visitors can feel the benefits too.
That’s why the government giving local leaders the power to introduce an Overnight Visitor Levy - to raise and reinvest money in much-loved high streets, public spaces and attractions.
I spoke to @TristramHuntVA, Director of the @V_and_A what the levy could mean for tourist destinations across the country.
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
My monologue on today’s The Times at One with ANDREW NEIL. @TimesRadio
Interest rates up, inflation up — in the UK
As the rest of the world tries to grapple with the fall out from the US midterm elections — what will two bloody noses for President Trump and a Democratic Congress mean for US foreign policy? — PM Andy Burnham’s contribution is to suggest the world unites around cost of living issues.
Workers of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but high prices.
It is, of course, an absurd proposition.
Presumably he’s referring to the need to resolve the conflicts in Ukraine and the Gulf, both of which have pushed up energy prices and added to general inflationary pressures.
But it’s not clear how the midterm results will affect either war — certainly not in ways of which Mr Burnham would approve.
President Trump would have no compunction in selling out Ukraine. That would certainly bring peace of a kind — in the form of a Russian victory. Mr Burnham surely couldn’t approve of that.
In the Gulf there’s a renewed US military build up with Mr Trump indicating, now the midterms are out of the way, more major assaults on Iran.
To what purpose has not been explained and they would likely pave the way to massive Iranian retaliation. So Mr Burnham would surely not approve of that either.
The implication of the PM’s remarks is that, on the cost of living — the most important economic issue facing British people — he is not in control.
That it depends on global factors outside his powers. The Chancellor paved the way for this position when he began his Budget speech by claiming everything he was about to say could be blown away by global events beyond his control.
Mr Burnham has now echoed that.
And, of course, there are global events which can push up prices in Britain and stymie economic growth, about which a British government can do very little.
But ministers are not exactly powerless when it comes to the cost of living, though they like to give that impression.
Take petrol. If it costs you £100 to fill up your tank — and that’s not uncommon these days — be aware that almost half of that is going in taxes.
The tax take in all manner of energy costs is enormous. The government could do something about that, pressing down on inflation. But its so-called breathing space measures barely scratch the surface of living costs.
The Bank of England has just whacked up interest rates by a quarter point to 4%, with the prospect of more to come next year. Some speculate they could be as high as 5% by this time next year, which heralds more misery for those with a mortgage or a small business loan.
Inflation rose to 3.6% in September, propelled by energy costs, and the Bank expects to reach around 5% before next summer — a dramatic rise on previous forecasts.
Nobody is sure when it will start to come down again. That may depend on what President Trump has in store in the Gulf.
The official forecast is for the UK economy to grow by 1.2% this year and 1% next. These are hardly stellar rates for a government that promised to put growth left, right and centre of its economic policy.
Now, other than tinkering at the edges, it has become a spectator, hoping that events outside of its control will come to its aid.
But hoping President Trump will somehow do the right thing when it comes to the cost of living isn’t an economic policy, it’s a fool’s errand.
Nevertheless Mr Burnham appears to have set out on one — and it will be of no help to the cost of living this winter.
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Yet another aspect of the 'reset' which doesn't make sense... 👇
I’m confused. Why would anyone wish to introduce discrimination between how we treat students from different, friendly international countries - an Austrian versus an Australian for example?
And when the government says it cannot afford to offer lower interest rates to British student loan holders, why would subsidising the UK study of EU Commissioners’ children be a priority?
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Andrew Neil totally demolishes the case for rejoining the EU should Labour decide to go down that route.
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Burnham is bonkers!
Ensuring his and future governments cannot get their hands on all those tax revenues just sitting in the ground waiting to be released.
So they'll have to squeeze taxpayers like you and me even harder
And still have to buy oil and gas from abroad.
Cui bono?
telegraph.co.uk/business/202…
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
The slave trade was a great evil. Britain has already paid off its debts for its role.
We do not owe these countries a penny.
The Prime Minister's concessions will only invite more absurd demands for reparations. This is embarrassing.
Burnham hands Caribbean £40m after demands to atone for slave trade
Read this front page story here ⬇️
telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
This is sooo dishonest. Profits of energy suppliers are regulated!!
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
It's already cost taxpayers £40m. And will cost ever more if the government keeps on down this path
A formal apology for the UK’s role in the transatlantic slave trade will not lead to higher costs for the British taxpayer, the Foreign Secretary has insisted.
Ed Miliband accused previous governments of a tendency to “sweep under the carpet” the issue of slavery but ruled out extra financial contributions, as well as the prospect of reparations.
🔗 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
🤦♂️ Wow.
🥀 Just when you think they’ve learnt, Labour have today published their so called ‘Energy Independence Bill’ where they commit to legislating to ban all new petroleum exploration and production licenses.’
🙃 Oh and for good measure, are changing the objective of the NSTA to move away from Maximum Economic Recovery…which we need now more than ever…to include ‘net zero and transition considerations’. Cmon!
🤪 These people are utterly delusional! Unhinged. Dangerous and totally oblivious the economic and energy threats this country faces.
Might as well hang a closed for business sign over Aberdeen and the North Sea.
They’ve learnt nothing. We will oppose this. Vote against it. And immediately overturn it when we win the next election.
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
EXCLUSIVE: Charities that called for Mahmood's immigration U-turn received more than £1billion in taxpayers' cash
dailymail.com/news/article-1…
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
QUENTIN LETTS: Our Mr Bean of a Foreign Sec is a national liability dailymail.com/debate/article… via @DailyMail
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
‼️ Remember when Labour said it had scrapped Digital ID? But it hadn’t? Well … media reports of Labour rolling back Net Zero are er … wrong.
they’re introducing the Energy Independence Bill to Parliament TODAY
▪️North Sea oil and gas - No new exploration licences for new fields.
▪️Existing fields can continue operating.
▪️Fracking - Labour now wants to restrict new licences in law
▪️Renewables - Measures to accelerate offshore wind, hydrogen and other clean energy projects.
▪️National Grid - New powers to speed up electricity infrastructure, including reforms to land access and consents.
▪️Landlords - Tougher energy efficiency requirements, with fines of up to £30,000 for breaches
▪️New Quango (LOL) A Warm Homes Agency to help deliver a £15 BILLION home electrification programme.
▪️Ofgem - Expanded powers over energy companies, brokers and intermediaries.
▪️Renewable developers - Mandatory payments to communities hosting large wind and solar projects.
They aren’t backing off, they are doubling down!, just with different messaging. Ignore what they say, watch what they do!
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Andy Burnham seems ready to blow an awful lot of political capital on a UK-EU 'reset' that, even on his figures, would eventually add just 0.4% to GDP.
And I bet even that 0.4% ignores most of the economic and political costs, including the loss of sovereignty… 🤔
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Time and again the King manages to show deft diplomacy that outshines any govt minister 👏🏾
“history also teaches us that evil need not have the last word; that character and courage can combine to overcome the most monstrous injustice, as they did with the determination to end international trade in enslaved people, in which the Royal Navy played such a leading role.”
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Labour have given away the farm with their awful agrifood deal with the EU.
No say in the laws, a rubber stamp parliament, and a massive bill. If anything is 'hard Brexit', it's that.
My @Telegraph column tonight.
telegraph.co.uk/gift/65ac678…
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
This explains the EU Reset: it is intended to save the EU, not increase UK exports.
Andrew Paddison - Team Paddison retweeted
Replying to @UKLabour
@UKLabour claims that we have to follow EU food standards and SPS rules because our food exports to the EU have dropped.
But take a good look at the chart below: the main drop in fruit exports to the EU is in citrus fruit, pineapples, avocados, mangoes, and Bananas.
These were always re-exports from Commonwealth countries that the EU miscounted as UK exports. Now that we are outside the EU, these goods are correctly counted as non-UK exports.
The #EUReset won't change this.




























