Top AI models for image, video, chat, and music on one reAPI endpoint — 99.96% uptime, automatic failover, zero request logging. start free https://xitter.cf/t.co/k03ebtD6Vo
Joined August 2026
- Tweets210
- Following4
- Followers47
- Likes7
Kimi K3.1 Pro is now on reAPI.
1M-token context, image understanding, tool calling and structured output.
Per 1M tokens: $2 input / $10 output / $0.10 cache reads.
Build with it: reapi.ai/models/kimi-k3-1-pr…
Kling 4.0 is live on reAPI.ai.
Kling's own API isn't open yet. Here, one API key and you're generating.
3–30s clips with stereo sound, 720p or 1080p, up to 10 keyframes, image/video/audio references, edit and extend.
From $0.1425/s. No subscription.
reapi.ai/models/kling-4-0
Higgsfield Genjutsu Lite actually utilizes the Wan 3.0 model. You can access it via wanapi.app at half the official price, with a pay-as-you-go billing model.
What Higgsfield is doing should be illegal, you should not be allowed to scam normal unaware users like this.
"Genjutsu Lite" is Wan 3.0.
"Genjutsu" is Seedance 2.5.
They rename other companies' models and sell them as their own. Here is every proof, from their own API docs
-> Genjutsu Lite = Wan 3.0
• Pricing: 480p $0.05 / 720p $0.10 / 1080p $0.20 per sec
• Out of 40+ models on their API, only ONE other has this exact pricing: Wan 3.0
• Resolutions: 480p / 720p / 1080p, same as Wan 3.0
• References: Lite takes 1 video + 8 images. Wan 3.0 takes 5 videos + 10 images. Lite is Wan 3.0 with a fixed prompt and settings locked
-> Genjutsu = Seedance 2.5
• Reference images: Genjutsu takes up to 30. Seedance 2.5 takes exactly 30. Wan caps at 10
• Video length: Genjutsu takes 4–30s. Seedance 2.5 is exactly 4–30s
• Price: $0.318 / $0.681 / $1.632 per sec, which is Seedance 2.5 video-edit pricing + ~20–30% markup
-> It's not just Genjutsu
• Cinema Studio 4.0: $0.2057 / $0.4623 per sec
• Seedance 2.5: $0.2056 / $0.4622 per sec
• That's Seedance 2.5 again
• "3.5x cheaper" isn't a breakthrough. They swapped Seedance 2.5 for Wan 3.0, a cheaper model, and called it "Lite"
• Real Wan is listed as alibaba/wan-3.0. The same model is sold as higgsfield/genjutsu-light
• They never tell you what's underneath
I have never seen such a big company being untruthful to their users outright like this.
Build more AI video for less with Wan API.
• Wan 3.0: $0.0275/sec at 480p, 45% off official prices
• Seedance 2.0 Mini: just $0.128 for a real 4-second, 480p text-to-video test
• Seedance series: 10% off official prices
Pay as you go. Failed requests aren't charged.
Explore models and pricing: wanapi.app/pricing
Gemini 4 Argon is live on reAPI.
60% below Google's current Standard input/output rates:
$0.80 input / $4 output per 1M tokens.
1M context. Native Gemini API + streaming.
What will you build?
reapi.ai/models/gemini-4-arg…
Seedance 2.5 from $0.072/sec.*
Nano Banana 2.1 in 4K for $0.03/image.
Wan 3.0 from $0.036/sec at 480p.
One API key. Image + video generation. Pay as you go.
Explore the lineup on reAPI 👇
🎬 Video
• Seedance 2.5 — from $0.072/sec*
• Wan 3.0 — from $0.036/sec
🎨 Images
• Nano Banana — from $0.015/image
• Nano Banana 2 Lite — from $0.015/image
• Nano Banana 2 — from $0.028/image
• Nano Banana Pro — from $0.030/image
• Nano Banana 2.1 — from ~$0.028/image
• GPT Image 2 — from ~$0.005/image
• GPT Image 2.5 — from ~$0.002/image
• Seedream 5.0 Pro — from $0.032/image
Generate a product shot. Bring it to life with video. Build the workflow into your app.
Start here → reapi.ai/models
#AI #AIVideo
Maybe seedance 2.5 On reAPI start $0.07
reapi.ai/models/seedance-2-5
Higgsfield is really over-marketing itself all over X (formerly Twitter); its promotional content is everywhere.
at $0.04 per video, the budget question shifts from whether to test variations to how many you can review and actually use. the bottleneck is probably creative selection, not generation cost.
At reapi.ai, it costs just $0.03 per request—the price is the same for 1k, 2k, or 4k.
i usually test prompts at low resolution first, then only render the final once the composition and text are behaving. saves a lot of wasted image credits.
At reapi.ai, it costs just $0.03 per request—the price is the same for 1k, 2k, or 4k.
Nano Banana 2.1 is cheaper and 5x faster than GPT Images
we tested the new Nano Banana model against GPT images with the same prompt and 5 images
numbers:
• Nano Banana 2.1: $0.044/image, rendering in 11 seconds
• GPT Images 2.5: $0.069/image, rendering in 50 seconds
Both models run via aimlapi.com
At reapi.ai, it costs just $0.03 per request—the price is the same for 1k, 2k, or 4k.
