Pinned Tweet
My grandson in Israel sent us this video describing the brave Israelis soldiers as superheroes. It definitely fits! ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐
teapawt.net/RackMada/status/177177โฆ
ืืืื ืฉืืฉื ืืืจื ืืืืชื ืืฉ ืื ื ืื ืื ืฉืื ืืื ืืืืจ ืฉืืจ ืืกืคืืืืคื ืืืืื ืฉืืืขืื ืืืชื, ืืืื ืฉืืฉื ืืืืจืื ืืื ืฉืื ืืืจ ืืช ืืฉืืจ ืืื ืฉื ืืชืงืืื 6, ืื ื ืื ืืช ืขืืืื (ืกืืืื), ืืื ืืืืื ืืฉืืจ ืืชืืืื ืืืืื ืืืขืืช ืืื ืืืืฉืชื, ืืื ืืืฉื ืืืืืืื ืื ืจืื ืืืชื ื ืืฉืชื ืงืื, ืืืื ื ืืืืืจื ืขื
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
โMe and my brethren spent the entire time prior to the midterm psyoping the unprincipled young voters who listen to Podcastistanโand who voted blueโso now weโre blaming the principled conservatives instead of looking in the mirror because weโre allergic to accountability.โ
Tonight I got to met someone that has fought harder than most for the Jewish people.
If you look up the definition of mensch in a dictionary, a picture of @COLRICHARDKEMP comes up.
It was an honour meeting you tonight. Thank you for fighting as hard as you do for Israel and the Jewish people.
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Replying to @JohnPaulDetriot
Had he finished what he started, instead of playing footsie with lunatics that have spent 47 years screaming โdeath to Americaโ this would all be over by now and the world would be a safer place. When has appeasement ever worked?
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
He saved lives Oct 7 and 5 more lives donating his organs. ZโL ๐๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฏ๏ธ
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Standard Operating Procedure for Jew Haters:
Attack Zionists and Israel; the one Jewish state.
When Jews call out the antisemitism, call the Jews antisemites for conflating Jews with Israel, all while using Zionist as code for Jew.
Pretend it is a kindness to separate Jews from Israel.
Repeat ad nauseum
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Eisenkot is nothing like Netanyahu.
Comparing Netanyahu to Eisenkot is like comparing Trump to Abdul. Below are examples of comments made by Eisenkot and his inner circle made about Trump and relevant issues. Netanyahu is right, Eisenkot is left.
Eisenkot's Criticism of Trump โ Initial Overview
1.Eisenkot Critical of President of Trumpโs Withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA)
Maariv (August 14, 2022) maariv.co.il/elections-2022/โฆ
"I think it was a strategic mistake.โ
"I thought so in real-time, and I hold the same view in retrospect."
2. Eisenkot supported Obamaโs agreement with Iran: Eisenkot: "There are opportunities in the agreement with Iran" ... " In my estimation, over the next five years, Iran will make major efforts to fulfill its part and reap the benefits." โ Ynet January 18, 2016 ) ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,Lโฆ
3. Eisentkot is ready to accept a Middle East with weapons of mass destruction. "The IDF should adapt itself to the potential introduction of weapons of mass destruction into the Middle East." (Maarachot Publication April 2018) maarachot.idf.il/media/wp3poโฆ
Surrounded by Hard-Left
4. Ronen Manelis (Eisenkot's Chief of Staff ) โ
criticized Trump's withdrawal from the nuclear deal and supported the agreement that Biden attempted to sign in 2022: "A deal at this point in time is good for Israel... It is unequivocally clear that Trumpโs 2018 withdrawal brought Iran closer to a bomb." (Kan August 27, 2022) kan.org.il/content/kan-news/โฆ
5. Roy Folkman, appointed by Eisenkot as Chairman of his party โ signed a letter in December 2015 against Trumpโs planned visit to Israel.
โ I believe Trump's sweeping statements against women, immigrants, and people with disabilities place him beyond what is legitimate in political discourse."
Haaretz, December 9, 2015
haaretz.co.il/news/politi/20โฆ
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
JD Vance is a political chameleon dressed up as a patriot, and I wouldnโt trust that slippery bastard to lead a damn parade, much less the United States of America.
He went from Never Trump to Trumpโs running mate when the opportunity presented itself. Now Republicans take a beating in the midterms, and suddenly heโs explaining why the Iran war and our relationship with Israel cost them the election.
Funny how his political instincts always seem to point toward his own future.
This is the same man who barely had time to warm his Senate seat before becoming Vice President. Now weโre supposed to believe heโs presidential material?
And Tucker Carlson? Vance can defend their friendship all he wants. I have no respect for anyone who makes excuses for antisemitic garbage.
Iโm sick of career politicians who confuse ambition with conviction and political survival with leadership.
Give me Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth over JD Vance any damn day.
America doesnโt need another polished opportunist auditioning for the White House.
It needs a leader with a backbone, a record, and principles that donโt change with the polling numbers.
JD Vance will never have my support.
Thatโs my opinion, and you canโt change it.
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Replying to @DrEliDavid
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
If you're not going to finish the job, then stay out of the way and let Israel do it.
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
The Muslim Brotherhood (which should have been banned) is fielding hundreds of candidates from school board to US Congress. The US started committing this suicide decades agoโฆ
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Replying to @lsferguson
She just got re-elected by the strong Somali base of voters she has that reside in Hennepin County. The fraud just continuesโฆ.and continuesโฆ
Minnesota is now completely controlled by the Democratic Party or better known as the DSA.
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
And just like that, all the talk of getting Ilhan Omar out of our country has stopped
What happened?
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Don't blame Tucker. He was trying to help Republicans when he abandoned the party, then fabricated a story on the eve of the election that Trump wants to drop a nuke and start WWIII, destroying the entire world.
And don't say this influenced anyone. It was only viewed 100 million times.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. โBibi calls Trump about it every day,โ says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last weekโs election results, he canโt form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, heโs applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war theyโve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahuโs lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of Americaโs longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They wonโt recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
Weโve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten Americaโs nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called โbattlefield nukesโ easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now weโre on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, heโs hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
Theyโre right, though it wonโt be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasnโt been consulted so far is the global population โ the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
JD Vance will come back from Qatar victorious:
"We got Mojtaba to renew the fatwa. Iran will not have a nuclear weapon".
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
๐จ See that creature on the left?
Thatโs a communist monster from the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) in SOUTH CAROLINA.
Want to see what they did to hundreds of minors in January?
Itโs ugly. And it went totally ignored by our $79 billion dollar Department of Education.
The PSL is one of the most dangerous Marxist-Leninist organizations in America.
Most of their funding comes from a CCP-linked network.
Their chapters are spreading like cancer cells into red states.
In January, the PSL began recruiting minors through social media.
They gained access to their phones, text messages, emails and class schedules, then coordinated mass walkouts against ICE and the U.S. government.
Hundreds of minors in SOUTH CAROLINA were mobilized by communists, fed revolutionary scripts, had megaphones shoved into their hands and began protesting ICE.
A couple of schools attempted to lock the doors, but they were overwhelmed with students demanding to be released into the hands of monsters.
Many of their taxpayer-funded teachers helped to facilitate the PSLโs indoctrination.
Communists targeted kids in a red state for a Maoist-like revolution. Not one kid, not two, but HUNDREDS.
Not one word, NOT A PEEP from our Education Secretary or Dept of Education, as domestic terrorists prey upon the next generation of voters.
@StephenM
@FBI_Response
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Replying to @AriFleischer
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Mr. Vice-President,
Please allow me to present a different perspective.
The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire.
If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it โ otherwise donโt start it.
This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the worldโs biggest supporter of terrorism.
Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or wonโt we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency.
In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue.
No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision.
Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didnโt last, didnโt work and left us in no manโs land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed.
Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon.
No, Mr. Vice President. Itโs not the war. Itโs the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"โwhether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnโt sharp enough down the stretch. Iโm sure thatโs true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollsterโone of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weโd lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheโs also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementโby focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, โI told you soโ: youโre right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letโs take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Reenchuk ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ retweeted
Replying to @DrEliDavid
Should have finished the job months ago. Both elections would have been won.
































