RekhPareek (@rekh37) profile picture
Joined March 2013
Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)Photo by RekhPareek (@rekh37)
₹20 लाख सालाना का पैकेज ठुकराकर IIT Roorkee का इंजीनियर बना 'बाबा', और फिर जो घटिया खेल उसने खेला उसने सबके रोंगटे खड़े कर दिए! ​अभिषेक मिश्रा नाम का यह शख्स पढ़ाई पूरी करने के बाद अध्यात्म के रास्ते पर चला गया और मथुरा के राधाकुंड आश्रम में दास बनकर रहने लगा। ​बाबा का टारगेट बिल्कुल फिक्स था— वह सिर्फ B.Tech, M.tech या नर्सिंग की पढ़ाई कर रही उन अमीर घरों की लड़कियों को फंसाता था जो dippression या तनाव में थीं। ​लड़कियों को आश्रम बुलाकर प्रसाद में नशीली चीज खिलाई जाती थी, और जब वे बेहोश हो जाती थीं, तो यह शातिर बाबा उनके साथ गलत वीडियो बना लेता था। ​अगले दिन उसी वीडियो को ब्लैकमेलिंग का हथियार बनाकर वह लड़कियों से लाखों रुपए ऐंठ रहा था... 1/2
18
63
1
165
27,412
RekhPareek retweeted
This little liar got caught. Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D) @rep_jackson claimed he was stuck in a traffic jam so he couldn’t vote to impeach Pete Hegseth. But TMZ saw him on the steps of the Capitol 10 mins before the vote.
656
6,672
429
36,136
1,028,276
🚨This morning we reached the required 218 signatures on my discharge petition for Epstein Files Transparency Act II ! I’m working closely with @RepJayapal, @RepTeresaLF and @RepRoKhanna to get this to the floor for a vote soon.
4,062
11,019
523
79,671
1,542,094
RekhPareek retweeted
For 2 YEARS, University of Madras has been violating the RTI Act with impunity. On 11 Oct 2023, I filed an RTI request seeking basic information about PhD fees. What followed is a masterclass in institutional opacity & contempt for transparency. A thread 🧵 1/10
1
59
6
165
124,988
Today, I led 11 of my Senate colleagues in calling on House & Senate leadership to strip the upcoming defense bill of provisions that MANDATE defense & intelligence cooperation with Israel — including one advanced by Netanyahu himself.   This doesn’t make us safer, see why ⬇️
Tomorrow, the Senate will take a key vote on the $1.1 TRILLION defense bill. It not only fails to rein in Trump’s Iran war, it also has a provision touted by PM Netanyahu to MANDATE more U.S. defense cooperation with Israel. None of this is in our national security interests. I will vote NO.
1,062
5,728
236
25,897
662,562
RekhPareek retweeted
A severe drought is unfolding in Fiji. Families wake before sunrise just to secure enough water for the day. Meanwhile, Stewart & Linda Resnick, the Zionist billionaires who own the billion-dollar brand "Fiji Water", enjoy 24/7 uninterupted access to the nation’s water supply.
93
939
40
1,943
19,548
How Apni Pathshala is changing the lives of thousands of students across India apnipathshala.org
1
8
43
2,182
RekhPareek retweeted
The US government just took a 35% stake in an oil company run by a man Switzerland is still investigating for money laundering. And one of the four people who signed the deal wasn't even publicly named. Orlando Alvarado. ProPublica found his name buried in the agreement. The Miami Herald identified him in 2019 as an unindicted co-conspirator in a $1.2 billion scheme involving Venezuela's state oil company. He was never charged. Then there's Alejandro Betancourt. According to the Washington Post, Landau, Bondi and Blanche all contacted Swiss officials about his money-laundering case. Blanche reportedly wanted it resolved without criminal penalties. Switzerland withdrew its UK extradition request, Betancourt got a US visa, and by August 30 he's signing an oil deal with Rubio and Hegseth. Now here's what caught my attention in the Epstein files. In December 2012, Epstein was personally connecting businessmen over Venezuelan oil concessions. Six days later, an NDA was circulated with Epstein, Alvarado and Betancourt all copied. Epstein had also invested at least $4.5 million in Venezuelan oil bonds. Fourteen years later, two names from that same correspondence are involved in a US government oil deal, after senior American officials intervened in one man's foreign criminal investigation. That's one hell of a coincidence. And who owns the rest of the Barbados company we're now partnering with? We don't know. Congress tried to subpoena the records, Republicans voted it down, and State handed over one document. At what point do we stop pretending these are all unrelated stories? NDA: justice.gov/epstein/files/Da…
29
289
21
506
9,040
Who should control money? How much money should exist? Can governments be trusted with unlimited power to create it? And what actually makes money valuable? An Indian economist was asking these questions back in 1923. His name was Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. And his ideas have an interesting connection to Bitcoin. 🧵 @saifedean @rekh37 #Bitcoin #SoundMoney #BTC #Inflation #India teapawt.net/saifedean/status/21199…?
In today's Spaces discussion of The Bitcoin Standard course, @rekh37 mentioned B.R. Ambedkar, an Indian economist who, in 1923, suggested an Indian rupee of a fixed supply, probably the first-ever Bitcoin-like proposal en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._R._… His book: gutenberg.org/cache/epub/631…
1
1
1
1
39
The chances were always low that House Dems would elect anyone other than Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker because of how rigidly hierarchical and pro-institution they are. But any chance of choosing someone else was permanently crushed months ago when AOC announced on Meet the Press that Jeffries was the candidate she supports for Speaker (even though he supported, armed and funded what she claims she believes is a "genocide" in Gaza and he still defends it). AOC's support made Jeffries' elevation a foregone conclusion.
Hakeem Jeffries: “You think I don’t have the votes nailed down? I guess we’ll find out next Wednesday.” - Dem Members are getting 500 calls/day against Hakeem Jeffries - A petition has over 1 Million signatures against Hakeem Jeffries VOTERS DON’T COUNT
172
428
30
2,956
338,562
क्या यह महज एक संयोग है? Gyanendra Awasthi पहलगाम में आतंकवादी हमले में हमारे निर्दोष नागरिक मारे गए. तब वहां के DGP यानि पुलिस महानिदेशक थे- नलिन प्रभात! अब चलिए फ्लैशबैक में चलते हैं... चार साल पहले 3 अप्रैल 2021 को बीजापुर में नक्सलियों ने अपने जवानों को घेर लिया और अंधाधुंध फायरिंग की. हमारे 24 जवान शहीद हो गए।. उस समय IG था... बस यही -नलिन प्रभात! आइये, अब हम फ्लैशबैक में चलें... 2019 के लोकसभा चुनाव से पहले जो पुलवामा हमला हुआ...जिसमें हमारे 40 जवान शहीद हो गए... उस समय CRPF में एक वरिष्ठ पद पर थे... वो हैं-नलिन प्रभात! पुनः फ्लैशबैक... नौ साल पहले छत्तीसगढ़ के दंतेवाड़ा में हुए नक्सली हमले में CRPF के 76 जवान शहीद हो गए थे. उस समय CRPF के DIG थे बस यही - नलिन प्रभात! हालाँकि उस समय नलिन प्रभात को इसका दोषी पाया गया था और उनके खिलाफ प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई की गई थी. फिर भी, बाद में सरकार बदलने के बाद उन्हें क्लीन चिट दे दी गई और बीजापुर, पुलवामा और पहलगाम जैसे संवेदनशील इलाकों में बड़ी जिम्मेदारियां दे दी गईं। यह हमारे गृह मंत्रालय की उदारता का प्रतीक है, है न? एक और गर्व की बात ये है कि इन्हीं नलिन प्रभात ने बताया कि उन्होंने पांच महीने पहले मनाली में 10 करोड़ की प्रॉपर्टी खरीदी है!! ऐसा भी कहा जाता है कि चंडीगढ़ के सेक्टर 5 में उनके पास 26 करोड़ रुपए का बंगला भी है! और उनका वेतन 1.5 लाख रुपये प्रति माह था, जो अब ढाई लाख हो गई है! फिर भी, नलिन प्रभात को उनकी भावी 'उपलब्धियों' के लिए शुभकामनाएँ!! अब पहलगाम आतंकी हमले में ये J&K के DGP है और शाह के ख़ास भी! ___ कमल शुक्ला
286
2,810
163
5,973
211,459
RekhPareek retweeted
Before Bitcoin, Dr. Ambedkar Had a Plan for Money!
Did you know Dr. B.R. Ambedkar proposed something remarkably similar to Bitcoin's monetary philosophy back in 1923? In his book The Problem of the Rupee, Ambedkar argued for an inconvertible rupee with a fixed limit of issue. His concern? Governments should not have unlimited power to expand the money supply. Some fascinating parallels: • 1923: Ambedkar argued for restricting rupee issuance. • 1923: He advocated closing mints to unrestricted coinage. • 2009: Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin. • Bitcoin: A predetermined monetary issuance schedule and a hard cap of 21 million coins. Ambedkar didn't invent Bitcoin, blockchain or decentralised money. But decades before Bitcoin, he was asking a question that remains relevant today: Who should control the creation of money, and who should protect its value? India's monetary history is far more fascinating than we realise!
33
342
10
1,235
49,057
Baba Sahab Dr. Ambedkar wrote in 1923: "a far better way would be to have an inconvertible rupee with a fixed limit of issue." He wanted the mints closed "not merely to the public, as they have been, but to the Government as well." That is why Ambedkar was a PhD economist from Columbia and the London School of Economics before he wrote a word of the Constitution. Ambedkar was not only a public leader. He was one of India's first serious monetary economists.
Did you know Dr. B.R. Ambedkar proposed something remarkably similar to Bitcoin's monetary philosophy back in 1923? In his book The Problem of the Rupee, Ambedkar argued for an inconvertible rupee with a fixed limit of issue. His concern? Governments should not have unlimited power to expand the money supply. Some fascinating parallels: • 1923: Ambedkar argued for restricting rupee issuance. • 1923: He advocated closing mints to unrestricted coinage. • 2009: Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin. • Bitcoin: A predetermined monetary issuance schedule and a hard cap of 21 million coins. Ambedkar didn't invent Bitcoin, blockchain or decentralised money. But decades before Bitcoin, he was asking a question that remains relevant today: Who should control the creation of money, and who should protect its value? India's monetary history is far more fascinating than we realise!
11
66
1
326
4,292
This week's podcast episode is my full @DohaDebates on the nature of money with two MMT economists, @jasonhickel and @ptcherneva. This was a good one you don't want to miss!
207
263
103
1,600
215,055
RekhPareek retweeted
Replying to @saifedean @rekh37
I had no idea. I will read it and educate my group of friends. Thanks @saifedean and @rekh37
1
4
559
One year since I published this article 2.7 million views Zero Zionist refutations
Property Rights: The Root Cause of the Palestinian/Israeli Conflict The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is the inevitable result of the destruction of a centuries-old system of private property rights and its replacement by race-based state ownership. Since 1947, property rights in Palestine have been replaced by a government agency that owns the majority of land, constantly steals more, never sells, and only leases land to one racial group. Religious and racial conflict are not destined in Palestine; they are historically rare occurrences, but this system of property rights would create violent conflict anywhere. In 1945, the British mandate government surveyed land ownership in Palestine and found that Jews owned 5.67% of the total land, while Muslims, Christians & other denominations owned 48.31% of the land. The remaining 46.02% was public land, mainly in the sparsely inhabited desert in the south, most of which was de facto owned by the Bedouins who herded there. Among the privately-owned lands, only 10.5% was owned by Jews, while 89.5% was owned by non-Jews. There was not a single district in Palestine in which Jews owned a majority of the land, as this illustration makes clear.[1] In 1917, when the Balfour Declaration was issued, the Jewish population ranged from 4% to 13%. In 1945, the population of Palestine was 1,764,520, of which 69% were Muslim and Christian, and 31% were Jewish.[2] The majority of the Jewish population was recent immigrants from Europe, many illegal. Even after decades of legal and illegal immigration, land purchases financed by European benefactors, and terrorism against Palestinian civilians and British forces, the Zionist movement had less than a third of the population of Palestine, and owned less than 6% of its land when it established its ethnostate. To establish an ethnostate on a land in which the right ethnicity was less than a third of the population, and owned less than a twelfth of the land, Zionist terrorists engaged in a premeditated and systematic campaign of terrorism, murder, and violent expulsion, meticulously planned from the 1930s, ruthlessly executed against a largely unarmed population, and practically continuing until this day, explaining the conflict’s longevity. This has been extensively documented by Palestinian historians, such as Walid Khalidi and Rashid Khalidi, as well as by Israeli historians like Ilan Pappe and Benny Morris.[3] [Continues in next tweet]
10
64
1
426
17,045
My guess that most Economics and Finance students in India will be clueless about the history of Indian Rupee, problems of different types of money in the last 300-400 years, and why Dr Ambedkar proposed it. May be Indian Eco/Fin students should run a challenge to find it.
Did you know Dr. B.R. Ambedkar proposed something remarkably similar to Bitcoin's monetary philosophy back in 1923? In his book The Problem of the Rupee, Ambedkar argued for an inconvertible rupee with a fixed limit of issue. His concern? Governments should not have unlimited power to expand the money supply. Some fascinating parallels: • 1923: Ambedkar argued for restricting rupee issuance. • 1923: He advocated closing mints to unrestricted coinage. • 2009: Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin. • Bitcoin: A predetermined monetary issuance schedule and a hard cap of 21 million coins. Ambedkar didn't invent Bitcoin, blockchain or decentralised money. But decades before Bitcoin, he was asking a question that remains relevant today: Who should control the creation of money, and who should protect its value? India's monetary history is far more fascinating than we realise!
1
4
458
RekhPareek retweeted
Did you know Dr. B.R. Ambedkar proposed something remarkably similar to Bitcoin's monetary philosophy back in 1923? In his book The Problem of the Rupee, Ambedkar argued for an inconvertible rupee with a fixed limit of issue. His concern? Governments should not have unlimited power to expand the money supply. Some fascinating parallels: • 1923: Ambedkar argued for restricting rupee issuance. • 1923: He advocated closing mints to unrestricted coinage. • 2009: Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin. • Bitcoin: A predetermined monetary issuance schedule and a hard cap of 21 million coins. Ambedkar didn't invent Bitcoin, blockchain or decentralised money. But decades before Bitcoin, he was asking a question that remains relevant today: Who should control the creation of money, and who should protect its value? India's monetary history is far more fascinating than we realise!
32
200
9
816
59,135
RekhPareek retweeted
Replying to @saifedean @rekh37
@RBI Please consider reviewing Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s economic treatises on fixed supply theory. If fiat currencies cannot offer a fixed supply, allowing Bitcoin for Indians aligns with these principles. Ironically, the very Constitution governing our Indiawas crafted by his genius.
1
1
4
473