Pinned Tweet
The difference is that criticism of an ideology, policy or specific behaviour isn’t the same as claiming every trans person is guilty of it.
But pointing out that sex matters in safeguarding, healthcare or single-sex spaces isn’t a generalisation about trans people.
It’s an argument about policy and material differences. Address the actual argument, not a straw man.
Hmm retweeted
😡Strap in, this one is metal.
Quote "The Albanese government is standing by a taxpayer-funded website that tells pedophiles to not beat yourself up for having sexual fantasies about minors."
Taxpayer-funded Stop It Now! Australia is a government-backed prevention program that frames sexual attraction to children primarily as something to manage (with techniques like self-acceptance, distraction, and coping strategies) rather than something to eliminate.
The linked modules say:
• Treat child fantasies “like a wave” that will pass, go for a walk, do a puzzle, journal, cook.
• Don’t try to change the attraction. That could be “akin to gay conversion therapy”
• If you’re only into kids, “focus your attention exclusively on the physical sensations” while masturbating.
• “Don’t beat yourself up, it simply does not feel realistic to never have sexual fantasies about children”
• Show “compassion and self acceptance.” Having a sexual interest in kids can feel “lonely”
If you are like me and have genuine concern about the decisions being made by the major party idiots, I will invite you to follow me on X and also become a member of the Australian Peoples Party.
Membership is $50 and every dollar will be used to advocate and fix against crap like this and to put Australia First🇦🇺
🚨BREAKING: The Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026 has passed in the House of Representatives by Labor, Independents and the Greens.
96 YES, 38 NO.
Voted against by Liberals, Nationals, One Nation and Rebekha Sharkie.
Andrew Hastie didn’t appear at any divisions.
This bill will force online businesses to conduct annual risk assessments, report to eSafety and face penalties for non-compliance.
It gives the government power to influence platform design features and impose age-assurance requirements.
It authorises eSafety to operate covert “sock puppet” accounts for government surveillance and information warfare.
It will classify content that “encourages or promotes hostile attitudes towards women or gender equality” as harmful, including legitimate criticism of feminism.
Public hearings are set for 9–10 November, with the inquiry report due 20 November. The bill must still pass the Senate.
Hmm retweeted
The people on this platform I respect the most are those who constructively criticize their own tribe (or don't even have a tribe), are ruthlessly guided by a coherent set of principles, will acknowledge and accept facts that do not flatter their own positions or worldview, change their positions when facts warrant it, avoid hypocrisy (or at least acknowledge when they are engaging in it), and are capable of stripping away their own personal history and any moral arguments in order to inspect the logical or factual structure of an argument (i.e., cognitive decoupling).
But truth-seeking and intellectual honesty demand more than most people are willing to invest.
Hmm retweeted
The position of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner should not come as a surprise and in fact is the only position that she can take in order to try be consistent and coherent to herself and others given her overarching views and opinions.
We must understand that the position she expressed is the only position one can organically arrive at, if one - as she does- a) conflates sex and gender identity b) disregards the material reality of women in favor of women being a feeling or an identity. c) disregards that certain reproductive processes are tied to being of a certain sex.
I have genuinely tried to understand this position and to debate it with her to no avail. There is one point where we fundamentally differ and that I think underpins her positions on this: Commissioner Cody believes that if we were to recognize that women and girls have historically been discriminated against based on their sex (intersecting with other grounds), that would mean that we accept that that this discrimination is biologically determined and that this discrimination is acceptable or justified.
This reasoning is flawed. We would not follow the same logic with any other form of discrimination, say for example racial discrimination. Naming that black people are often and have been often discriminated against because they are black does not suggest that such discrimination is justified, nor a tacit acceptance of it, nor does it suggest that they should be forever locked in a condition of being racially discriminated against.
The answer to a serious problem cannot be to stop naming the cause, in the hope that this cause would magically go away or that its impact on the lives of people would soften or vanish.
Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody at Senate estimates said that protections designed to protect breastfeeding women from being discriminated against would also extend to “induced lactation in a biological male”. Read the full story: bit.ly/4zb29gC
Hmm retweeted
I have legit spent the whole day laughing about the Australian Human Rights Commission engaging a “communications consultant” to help them answer senate estimate questions, only to humiliate themselves by saying men who claim to be women need breastfeeding protections in law.
You have to laugh or we will lose our minds over this insanity of all this.
Hmm retweeted
Australia: A domestic terrorist who detonated a home made bomb at a military expo avoids jail because he’s “trans.”
It’s just as well because they probably would have sent him to a women’s prison.
BREAKING: A Sri Lankan transgender far left activist avoids jail after bombing a toilet at Melbourne’s Land Forces defence expo.
Malith Shamera Fernando, 25, of Blackburn, detonated a homemade incendiary device in the male toilets at the Melbourne Convention Centre on 12 Sept 2024, while people were in nearby cubicles.
It created a small fire and $4,600 damage. He scoped the venue the day before using his engineer ticket.
Police found 28 more homemade devices at his home, plus cannabis trafficking, ketamine and other drugs.
Protest material about “Free Palestine” and “disrupt Melbourne” was also recovered.
He pleaded guilty.
The prosecution demanded jail but soft on migrant crime Magistrate Donna Bakos gave him a Community Corrections Order, therapy and drug programs, and told him to pay the $4,600.
Why he avoided jail time?
Because prison would be “more onerous” due to his mental health diagnoses and gender status.
So a biological male who planted a bomb at a defence expo, stockpiled more explosives, and dealt drugs walks free, because the judge decided jail might be too hard for him.
Two tier justice on full display.
Hmm retweeted
J.K. Rowling could have kept quiet, banked her billions and stayed everyone's favourite author.
She didn't.
She put her name, her reputation and her own money on the line for women.
She founded Beira's Place, a women-only centre in Edinburgh for survivors of sexual violence. She has funded legal fights to protect women's rights and women-only spaces. And she has given a voice to women who were too scared to speak.
For that she has faced years of death threats, rape threats and torture threats.
She hasn't flinched once.
That's not just a literary legend. That's a hero for women everywhere. 👏🇬🇧
Hmm retweeted
A girl born today in @Australia will grow up, by law, a second class citizen. She may not draw boundaries between herself and men. She has no right to safety, privacy or fair sports as she grows. Men are her superiors in every way. It's like the west's version of Afghanistan.
Hmm retweeted
Any man who wants a baby to suckle him should be instantly thrown out of society forever with no chance of return. There is no redemption possible for baby predators.
Hmm retweeted
I don’t hate trans people. I hate that some trans people believe their rights supersede the rights of others – namely women.
Hmm retweeted
I have male friends and they're some of the nicest people around.
But we don't use my mates as a basis for policy with regards to entry into female changing rooms.
