rix1 (@rix1) header
rix1 (@rix1) profile picture

Dev, design, product and hooman. Is currently having fun chasing the sun together with @OtovoSolar ☀️ Born at 355.53 ppm CO².

Norway
Joined February 2009
Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)Photo by rix1 (@rix1)
Pinned Tweet
En historie i 4 faner. Ser ut som Norge og jeg har en ting til felles: Vi liker å utsette viktige ting. Klimamålene er som masteroppgaven min, la oss vente til tidsfristen nærmer seg. Etter regn kommer... mer regnvær?
1
3
357
I'm so sick of authentication in 2025. I spend no less than 30 minutes a day authenticating to services. Passkey is awful, yubikey has gotten replaced by it, we havent removed the infinite OTP flows, corporate SAML is a tire fire. This thing needs completely gutted.
228
123
41
2,245
165,179
rules, boxes, and the big game most people think the boxes around them are permanent, but they're just constructs. rules exist everywhere and yes, you need to learn them first — but most are just little games pretending to be the big game. if you're just starting out, you're going to feel like everyone else knows some secret rulebook you don't have. they don't. they're just playing by someone else's rules and calling it wisdom. the little games? metrics obsession, design system orthodoxy, bureaucracy trying to feel important. the big game is more about creating meaning, beauty, and helping humans flourish. you get to choose which one you play. i've watched teams spend weeks chasing a 2% conversion bump while their users are literally screaming that the product sucks. i've seen designers torture themselves making 12px work when 10px feels perfect, all because the style guide said so. i’ve seen endless ideas die just because they don’t match some conventional wisdom. but here's the thing — the best work comes from trusting yourself. every breakthrough i've seen happened when someone said "this feels wrong" and had the courage to try something different. they know when to bend the rules and jump out of it. learn the rules first, understand why they exist. then trust your gut and break them when they don't serve you. eventually you'll be making new rules that others follow. it's like learning music or color theory so you can break it beautifully — the rules teach you the language, but your instincts know the poetry. your uncertainty isn't weakness, it's potential. when you can tell the difference between little games and the big game, you're free to create something that actually matters. don't get stuck in boxes someone else built for their problems.
29
52
8
556
50,910
Same way the microwave turned everyone into a chef
AI turns every software engineer into a software designer
135
1,144
72
14,970
641,427
Can't be leadership if not leading and shipping
3
3
1
26
3,290
Hey @calcom, heads up - your .dev TLD is a couple versions behind (v4.1 -> v4.5) and isn't hiring 🙃
1
114
Build this AI product and I'll pay for it: Write articles out of interview and podcast transcriptions. I love too take notes/quotes from videos using @ReadwiseReader. However, spoken language is messy and difficult to highlight and quote. Processing it with AI should be easy.
1
2
133
Re: algospeak. If you work in a field that have a pathological struggle with naming things (software), you don't really have to make an effort to mask your search terms. This is one of my more memorable Google searches:
2
114
Hi @reflectnotes something I didn't mention in the yearly feedback. I find myself using iA writer just because of the nice writing experience. Some kind of integration here would be 🤯 Or just let me change the font to a nice serif-variant - I think that should take us 80%.
115
As the demand for electricity is expected to soar, millions of homes and businesses are becoming energy suppliers and storage nodes, Bill McKibben writes. nyer.cm/Y1Ff4rx
2
13
3
38
64,562
There's so much to like about @ReadwiseReader, but I especially love this little detail: Show and hide sidebars with [ and ]. I now want it in every app I use 🙏
3
159
Lol, I actually just opened Twitter to start a conversation on the constraints of linear chat UIs used to interact with LLM, and this was the first post I saw. The algorithm is dialed in 🎯 Anyways, my thoughts went something like this (1/x)
In 2006, I was 1 of 4 designers on Google Search. For 20 years, every search engine has copied Google. Now ChatGPT, Bard + Claude look like Google's offspring - "better” search engines. But last week signaled we're on the brink of a design revolution. ChatGPT unveiled incredible new features. These could give us the opportunity to completely shift how we interface with AI. Here's the full story: ––– When I was a designer on Google Search, all major search engines looked the same – Google, Yahoo, MSN Bing. Google was the market leader with a heavily optimized UI that supported billions of dollars in ad revenue. Naturally, it became THE way to show search results. Its success made it illogical for Google to consider big UI changes. And any changes they did make were just mirrored by everyone else. So 20 years later, we’ve only seen incremental changes to search engine UIs. ––– Today, we have consumer-ready LLMs (Large Language Models) freshly in our hands. As consumer products, these are in their infancy. We’re very early in understanding their capabilities and defining how people interact with them. These are uncharted waters. And yet ChatGPT, Bard, Claude etc. all chose a text-based input box — just like Google’s search box — as the core interface. Why? The input box is simple, versatile, and familiar. - It’s simple to understand → you type your questions into the box. - It’s versatile → the box can handle all sorts of questions/queries. - The paradigm is super familiar → people immediately know how to use it. Because of this, LLMs have essentially become “a better Google.” ––– But last week’s ChatGPT announcements thrust open the doors to new possibilities. ChatGPT is now multi-modal — it can see, hear, and speak. These are the recent announcements from @OpenAI : Voice: teapawt.net/OpenAI/status/17… Photos: teapawt.net/OpenAI/status/17… The example of ChatGPT explaining how to lower a bike seat was incredible. But, it could be so much better! The video showed you'll have to post multiple new photos to keep adding new information and to progress the conversation. It was still a linear conversation centered around the text box. But what if we rethought the interface to center around the image? What if ChatGPT supported both images AND voice simultaneously? Could we end up with a more immersive experience? ––– How else could interacting with LLMs mimic IRL conversations? Could we (or the AI) pinch to zoom or rotate the image? Could we interact in real time with video? What new possibilities open up with context being preserved over time? ––– There is so much energy and excitement around what AI can do. But we are limiting the potential by assuming the conversation box is the best interface. Right now, designers have the chance to create truly novel interactions and bust through the 20+ year old search UI paradigm. The ideas above are just to illustrate some potential options. But they are also intended to spark a flame. Now is the opportunity to be creative and explore divergent UIs. What are the craziest, coolest, most creative UI ideas we can unleash? LFG 🚀
1
1
229
Threads and replies are mechanisms that try to mimic this dynamic, but I think we can do better... 💭
1
45
I feel like @raunofreiberg or @skllcrn might know examples of UIs that try to challenge this?
1
56
Thinking about building a @raycastapp extension for quickly resizing your window to a pre-defined size (for screen recording, meetings screen sharing etc). Just wondering if this already exist?
102