🇮🇳|Hindu| ✊🏻| Serious and Sarcastic at the same time 😎 |Lannister| 🏏🎬 📢 | SRV | Stay away if you can't understand sarcasm |
King's Landing
Joined February 2014
- Tweets22.8K
- Following595
- Followers1.1K
- Likes75.4K
Pinned Tweet
లోకాలనేలేటోడు నీకు సాయం కాకపోడు
నీలోనె కొలువున్నోడు నిన్ను దాటి పోనే పోడు 🐚☸️
#Satyaparakrama
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
Deepam removes the darkness just like jnana(knowledge) removes andhakaram (darkness ) of maya
deepa prakasa perumal who shines like jn~Ana jyothi removes all our maya and sins
Ponnai mAmaNiyai aNiyArndhadOr Minnai veNgadath thuchchiyil kaNdu pOi Ennai yALudai Isanai embirAn Thannai yAm sendru kANdum thaN kAvilE
Thirumangai Aazhvaar says that the vEnkatachalapati adorned with gold jewels shines like a lightning is none other than Lord of thiruthanga (deepa prakasa perumal )
deepavali wishes to all of you may thAyar and perumal remove all the darkness and bless you with health and prosperity. 🙏
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
కం||
ద్రావిడ నాడుతరించెను
పావన యతిరాజుని గని వైష్ణవనిరతిన్
రావయ్య తెలుగు ధరకన
ఆవిర్భించె చినజీయరాచార్యునిగా
సద్వైష్ణవులందరికీ ఆచార్య తిరునక్షత్ర మహోత్సవ శుభాకాంక్షలు ❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
కాశ్యపాన్వయ సంజాతం నారాయణ పదాశ్రితం శ్రీమన్నారాయణం వన్డే యతీశ్వర శ్రియాజుషమ్॥
శ్రీమద్ ఉభయవేదాంత ప్రవర్తకాచార్యులు,
శ్రీమత్ పరమహంస పరివ్రాజకాచార్యులు శ్రీ శ్రీ శ్రీ త్రిదండి శ్రీమన్నారాయణ రామానుజ చిన్న జీయరు స్వామివారి తిరునక్షత్రోత్సవ శుభాకాంక్షలు
జై శ్రీమన్నారాయణ 🙏
This is made up nonsensical reason.
Karma is only for jivas. Supreme Brahman is not bound by any avidya or karma.
Vali was completely satisfied with the reasoning provided by Rama. Vali's rebirth story comes from Ananda Ramayana, but that's ONLY for Vali's sake.
Even as a supreme deity, Vishnuji was never above the cosmic law of karma........
When he took human form as Ramji and killed the vanar raaj Bali from behind a tree, he created a karmic debt. Ages later, Vishnuji returned as Krishnaji , and the soul of Bali was reborn as the hunter Jara.
While Krishna ji sat in meditation, Jara mistook his foot for a deer and shot a fatal arrow striking Krishnaji's only vulnerable spot
Instead of punishing the hunter, Krishnaji smiled and comforted him, validating that the ultimate law of destiny must always be balanced
#Ramayana
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
Na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti na me karma-phale spṛhā(BG 4.14)
Na cha māṁ tāni karmāṇi nibadhnanti.(BG 9.9)
Lord Vishnu, the Supreme Deity, is not bound by karma. No cosmic law stands above Him. His incarnations are divine manifestations, not ordinary souls bound by past actions.
Even as a supreme deity, Vishnuji was never above the cosmic law of karma........
When he took human form as Ramji and killed the vanar raaj Bali from behind a tree, he created a karmic debt. Ages later, Vishnuji returned as Krishnaji , and the soul of Bali was reborn as the hunter Jara.
While Krishna ji sat in meditation, Jara mistook his foot for a deer and shot a fatal arrow striking Krishnaji's only vulnerable spot
Instead of punishing the hunter, Krishnaji smiled and comforted him, validating that the ultimate law of destiny must always be balanced
#Ramayana
If there was Modi Sarkar and Gadkari, Rama would have reached home in 3 days, even by walk.
Thank you for national highways
FROM SRI LANKA TO AYODHYA!
According to Google Maps, walking from Sri Lanka to Ayodhya takes approximately 22 days! 😳
Interestingly, Diwali is celebrated 21 days after Dussehra marking the return of Lord Shri Ram to Ayodhya after defeating Ravana.
Hey @grok the Way is true?
Day 7 of NNN
నన్నాస పెట్టి ఈ సరదా రేపినదే నువ్ గనుకా
నా కొంగు పట్టి నడవనిదే కుదరదుగా 💁♀️
అడుగడుగున ఎదురైతే ఏ దారి తోచదుగా 🤷♂️
అటు ఇటు ఎటు తేల్చవుగా మన కథను తొందరగా 🙎♀️😤
ప్రతీ చోట నీ నవ్వే పిలుస్తోందిగా ❤️😊
నన్ను దాటి వెళ్ళలేవు నిన్ను నీవు దాచలేవు ఏమి చేయనయ్యో రామ
If this justification is true, it means that Shankara put his bias (ishta) while authoring commentaries rather than the true meaning. Since they are biased, they shouldn't be considered authoritative.
If someone's favorite is not Vishnu, they can also disregard everything.
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
When Ravana abduct Sita Ma, she laments about how she deserves this fate because she hurt the very righteous and noble Lakshmana Devaru with her cruel words.
When Sri Rama sees Lakshmana identify only the anklets, he declares that there is no one greater than his brother.
Hanumanji himself feared Lakshmana's wrath when Sugreeva spent time in indulgence after Sri Rama secured him the throne.
Any representation of Sri Lakshmana Devaru otherwise is criminal blasphemy.
GTSL and GTSR. OM purnamadham...
There is an error in this scene — Rama revived every Vanara who fought behalf of him.
None was cremated.
Sri Rama never abandons his people 🙇♂️🙇♀️
रक्षिता स्वस्य धर्मस्य स्वजनस्य च रक्षिता ।
Lanka, with its golden fortifications, was already built BY VISHWAKARMA on INDRA's command
Vishwakarma gave Lanka to Malyavan's brothers. They tormented the worlds, so devatas drove them out. Ravana later took it back from Kubera
Ravana did NOT build it. Just another whitewash.
According to modern snippet readers, self proclaimed brahmashris, orators, scholars and vidwans:
Someone: But you vowed that you wouldn't eat meat.
Rama: That was in the palace 😂😂🤣
(Rama never goes against his words. Don't repeat this blasphemy against scriptures)
Rama’s consumption of meat has textual support in the Valmiki Ramayana. Ayodhya Kanda 2.52.102 describes Rama and Lakshmana hunting animals including a boar and deer and taking meat for food when hungry. In 2.96.1-2, Rama offers Sita meat beside the Mandakini describing it as savoury and roasted over fire. Vegetarianism remains a respected Vaishnav-Hindu discipline, but reminder that Rama ate meat and so did the praja and the Rajas of the Vaishnavite Vijayanagara Empire.
NO and NO
Rama and Lakshmana hunted the deers, for their skin. It's just that they were hungry when they hunted.
In chapter 95, Rama reminds his vow to live on fruits and honey, and then eats a roasted fruit.
Why would Rama lie immediately? That makes him greedy.
Idiocy!
Rama’s consumption of meat has textual support in the Valmiki Ramayana. Ayodhya Kanda 2.52.102 describes Rama and Lakshmana hunting animals including a boar and deer and taking meat for food when hungry. In 2.96.1-2, Rama offers Sita meat beside the Mandakini describing it as savoury and roasted over fire. Vegetarianism remains a respected Vaishnav-Hindu discipline, but reminder that Rama ate meat and so did the praja and the Rajas of the Vaishnavite Vijayanagara Empire.
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
Half-baked knowledge strikes again!
Sita never asked for the deer’s skin to be used as a “furniture cover.” The Valmiki Ramayana is very clear:
निहतस्यास्य सत्त्वस्य जाम्बूनदमयत्वचि ।
शष्पबृस्यां विनीतायामिच्छाम्यहमुपासितुम् ॥
“If this deer is killed, I wish to sit upon its golden skin, overlaying it on a seat of tender darbha grass”
It was customary to sit on a deer skin asana, with Darbha grass, during religious observances and Vratas.
That is precisely what Sita is referring to. If the deer could not be captured alive, she wished to use its golden skin as a seat.
Amazing that such people are considered as scholars.
If Adipurush had better dialogues, costume and set designs, it would have been much better.
It was deliberately made as a cheap product. They didn't even double check the output.
S S GOD 👑 retweeted
lol Prahlada already said
కానని వాని నూతగొని కానని వాడు విశిష్ట వస్తువుల్
కానని భంగి కర్మములు గైకొని కొందరు కర్మ బధ్ధులై
కానరు, విష్ణు కొందరట, కందురకించన వైష్ణవాంఘ్రి సం
స్థాన రజోభిషిక్తులగు సంహృత కర్ములు దానవేశ్వరా!
🤷🏽♂️🤷🏽♂️