I am getting quite tired of these tirades against AI writing, often using derogatory and sweeping terms. I would say that the intellectually lazy thing is to use Pangram for assessing a text rather than doing it oneself. What is missed here is that you can work very intensely with AI to produce a text whilst having the AI write it out. You can provide the key content, and you can iterate back and forth many times until you, as the one taking full responsibility for a text, are fully satisfied. This is not laziness: it is a new, often delightful way of working for many colleagues who want to use their time efficiently and/or produce better texts that fully reflect the stance of the human working with AI. Of course, AI can be used to produce bad texts, but then it is the badness that should be criticized, not the use of AI, just like we should criticize bad human-written texts because of their low quality (and I have seen many of those over the years). nonicoclolasos.com/2026/07/2…