sead numanovic

Luka Mišetić has built his legal career almost exclusively around the defense of Croatian nationals accused of war crimes, including Anto Furundžija and Ante Gotovina, both figures whose roles in the conflicts of the 1990s remain highly contested. This consistent pattern of advocacy—centered on rehabilitating or exonerating individuals with deeply controversial historical records—raises legitimate concerns about professional and ideological bias. When one’s entire public legal identity is tied to defending a single national narrative, objectivity becomes compromised, and credibility diminished. In that light, Mišetić is in no position to make authoritative or impartial judgments about scholars, such as @JasminMuj, whose work challenges precisely the kind of biased and revisionist framing Mišetić has long promoted. His interventions are not neutral legal analyses but extensions of an adulterated political agenda aimed at cleansing Croatia’s wartime image. Consequently, his critiques carry the weight of advocacy, not scholarship. Gospodine Misetic, prvo pomesti pred svojim pragom.