Extrateto — Dashboard open-source que expõe os supersalários do judiciário brasileiro.
👉 github.com/andredutraf/extra…
O STF está discutindo o teto salarial neste momento. As informações catalogadas no dashboard podem ajudar jornalistas em suas matérias e qualquer cidadão a visualizar o tamanho do gasto acima do teto.
O projeto está pronto para deploy, os arquivos estão no GitHub para quem quiser subir o site ou contribuir com melhorias.
Se alguém da área jurídica puder der suporte, eu subo o site, sabemos como funciona o atual judiciário freestyle.
Inspirado no projeto do @brunoclz
Skott retweeted
If you want to understand the ZECBTC chart, it's pretty simple.
Bitcoin is caught flat-footed on two related issues: privacy and post-quantum security. The store of value proposition is very sensitive to both, but Bitcoin has no plan for either. Essentially, they will need (recursive) SNARKs, based on post-quantum hash or lattice-based assumptions, merely in order to deal with the *scaling challenges* of the much larger post-quantum signatures. That's just the bare minimum. The kinds of architectural changes needed to integrate all this stuff are beyond what they've ever shipped in Bitcoin's history.
I think they will try, because there's so much money involved, but there's no way they can address privacy at the same time. What's likely to happen is that a consortium of Bitcoin stakeholders (cryptographers, developers, miners, wallets, etc.) will announce a massive effort to address the quantum threat. This will mostly be a response to the one-bit market feedback loop that Bitcoiners actually internalize: number go down. That feedback loop will not communicate the serious competitive risk of Bitcoin's non-existing privacy until it's too late.
Contrast this with Zcash: we've been planning for a quantum apocalypse in both privacy and soundness for a decade. Most of our protocol design discussions are public: you can see for yourself! Our cryptography does not need to be upgraded to be post-quantum private; just an *out-of-band* payment protocol. Our protocol doesn't need to be upgraded to have quantum robustness; just changes to how wallets choose random blinding factors. After the Tachyon upgrade, our architecture won't even need to change for post-quantum soundness; some folding schemes will just need to be swapped out, and we have years to select the best one.
Skott retweeted
If you wait too long, the coffee gets cold, the door closes, you get old, the girls move on, and dreams fade.
You must act with a sense of urgency today.
Skott retweeted
3 things you should be doing every single day (from Marcus Aurelius)
1. Read. Read a lot as a kid and adult. Chrysippus was never satisfied with the gist of things. He was diligent, taking notes, looking things up, reading to learn not for fun or for status.
2. Journal. Fight to be the person philosophy wanted to make you. Carve out time for reflection at the end of the day.
3. Think about death - Memento Mori
Skott retweeted
The biggest skill will always be walking away from the casino
If you can’t do it, it doesn’t matter how much you’ve made. You’ll always give it all back.
This disastrous lack of communication before and after launch damaged the chart and the community’s trust, not even $100m buybacks can fix it
You handed market share over to Bonk @a1lon9
this text is a lesson
Closed My HYPE Trade
I’ve officially closed out my HYPE position.....meaning I sold every token I ever bought.
The airdrops, however, remain untouched. Because they serve a different purpose. More on that later.
Let’s start with where I exited....49.2. Not 50.
That detail might seem trivial to some, but if you’ve been around long enough, you know better. Round numbers aren’t just psychological magnets, they’re breeding grounds for traps. Everyone sees them. Everyone targets them. And when everyone is looking at the same level, the edge gets arbitraged out.
That’s the first principle I’ve come to internalize: in markets, clarity doesn’t come from what everyone sees....it comes from learning what to ignore. Round numbers represent consensus, and trading well often means moving just enough away from consensus to avoid being collateral when it snaps.
Now, the more important part: why I sold.
And the answer is deceptively simple....because the decision to sell was made long before the price got here.
In every high-conviction trade I’ve made, especially those where I enter with real size, I create the exit plan the moment I stop buying. Not when I feel like it, not when CT gets loud, not when greed kicks in.....right then and there. I set my limit sells quietly and walk away.
Because I’ve learned that if I don’t define “enough” while I’m still clear-headed, I’ll redefine it later when I’m emotionally compromised. And that’s where most good trades go bad.....not from poor entries, but from blurred exits.
The beauty of planning exits in advance is that it strips emotion out of the equation. When you’ve already done the work, the market can scream “we’re going to 100” and you won’t flinch....not because you’re stubborn, but because you’re disciplined.
Trading with size isn’t about ego or conviction theatrics; it’s about having the humility to admit that profit isn’t made at the top, it’s protected through process. After all, most of your P&L is determined the second you press “buy.” Everything that happens after that is just risk management and emotional control. People chase tops because they never defined success in the first place.
To be clear: I’m not bearish on HYPE. I’m just done with this trade. I made my 4.7x on size with low risk and high clarity. The current price would offer me, at best, a 2x, and for me, that’s no longer a compelling investment.
Every day you hold a token, whether consciously or not, you’re making the choice to reinvest in it. And at this level, I’d rather allocate that capital somewhere else.
The decision isn’t emotional, it’s mathematical: the expected value has compressed, and the opportunity cost has risen. The upside may still exist, but the asymmetry has faded.
Even if I were managing this trade on the fly, without a preset plan, I’d still be selling here.
Why?
The risk profile. Not in the chart, in the structure around it. HYPE has been so effective at executing , in product, in narrative, in volume, that it’s now threatening the old guard. And the old guard doesn’t lose quietly.
CEXs aren’t just watching; they’re preparing to respond.
They’ve already lost on innovation and culture. Now they’ll fight the only way they know how.....through lobbying, gatekeeping, and pressure disguised as “consumer protection.” And while HYPE has proven itself as a product, it lacks what the incumbents have in abundance: regulatory muscle. It has ethos, but not armor. And that gap matters when politics enters the arena.
I’m not saying this dynamic will kill HYPE.
But I am saying it introduces a layer of uncertainty that changes the risk-reward dramatically. When the potential reward shrinks and the potential risks expand in range and complexity, stepping aside becomes the only rational move. I’m not afraid of volatility, but I don’t play in environments where the cost of being wrong becomes undefined.
If that environment emerges, and the market overreacts to it, I’ll be the first to bid again, because the R/R will be back. I’m not early out of fear. I’m early because I was early in. That’s the whole point of having great entries, you earn the right to exit while others are still rationalizing their hold.
So then, why am I still holding my airdrops?
It’s simple: because I believe in what Jeff and the HYPE team are building. Not as a trade, but as a mission. In a space full of opportunists and empty wrappers, this team actually has a backbone. They move with intent, not gimmicks. They’ve delivered, and they’ve done it without selling their soul.
The airdrops I hold aren’t just tokens, they’re a big vote of confidence in a better version of this ecosystem. I don’t know if that vote will ever be rewarded, and frankly I don’t care. This is principle.
Most people think good trading is about timing the top. It’s not. It’s about having enough clarity to walk away before the noise gets too loud.
I’m not in this game to be right every time. I’m in it to compound decisions that don’t require being perfect....just consistent, rational, and clear.
That’s how you stay in the arena long enough to catch the trades that actually matter.
bonk 2.3b mcap
fartcoin 1.3b mcap
pumpfun 1.1b mcap
pump team with $2b in hands to work on
seems a no brainer
Shorted $RAY.
And I will explain why I believe the price will reach $1.5 ~ $2 on medium term with the launch of the pumpfun AMM (in short, pumpfun will create the liquidity pool without raydium).
We can see that the price follows the volume, I don't have data, but I would say that 95% of the raydium volume is from pumpfun bonded tokens, for swap people use JUP.
With the launch of Pumpfun AMM, I believe this volume would fall to around $500m or less. In the graph below, you can see that the tokens created in Pumpfun also follow Raydium's volume.
Compare with previous graph
If pumpfun allows people to collect the LP fees from their launches with AMM, it would even be the death of current competitors
Raydium team is in a tough spot, they will have to act.
I wouldn't short at the current price, it has dropped 30% since people found out about the news, so there should be a good pullback to short























