
Senior Lecturer in Political Theory @kingspol_econ. Writing a global history of unions for @penguinukbooks. PI DERISK ERC grant on democracy and systemic risk.
London
Joined March 2017
- Tweets17K
- Following3.4K
- Followers8.1K
- Likes16.9K
Pinned Tweet
"The Work of Politics: Making a Democratic Welfare State" out now with Cambridge University Press. Here's my overview of the argument in @jacobinmag:
jacobinmag.com/2020/10/welfa…
A) this seems to massively exaggerate the roll of a WhatsApp group in Lula's win
B) PT is less robust but it is a paradigmatic non-hyperpolitics mass party of the sort we've supposedly lost
C) they won one of the most significant elections for democracy in Brazil's history
More typical democrat elitism. Imposing their values on the rest of America. Universal charcuteries only resonates on the coasts.
Replying to @stevenmklein
That's not true. Most Americans have seen and consumed cheese.
Cheesecake maybe is more niche.
Most Americans have barely seen cheese, let alone a cheesecake. A factory that produces cheesecakes would appear almost like a miracle. This is why the Dems are so out of touch with America.
Ah yes that great practice of demanding all Muslims denounce all acts of islamic terrorism, we should definitely expand that logic and not challenge it
Replying to @stevenmklein
You and your Jewish daughter should just be open and say you don't support the #genocide just like Muslims had to say they didn't support #911 or the Manchester attacks etc.
Israel claiming it acts for all Jews is driving some #Antisemitism
#bbclaurak #bbcqt #Newsnight #twip
I personally have not gotten a chance to look at the anti-Semitism report but both my children have experienced clear and aggressive antisemitism in their school life, even more so when the war broke out. My daughter is afraid to tell people she's Jewish.
They didn't know what yom Kippur was and only relented when we showed them the local councils list of approved religious holidays b
New paper: "AI Article Reviews Dominate Human Peer Reviews at Their Best: Evidence and Policy Choices" See: GaryKing.org/peerless. with Steven Worthington. Comments welcome!
Steven Klein retweeted
This is how it has always been BTW. People like this with zero artistic creativity or talent DETEST people who can create.
It makes all the sense in the world to me that these guys would rather listen to AI slop than be in awe of a talent they'll never achieve.
My quick googling indicates that the accounting model they're using here doesn't say discount uncertain taxes by 50% but for accounting purposes only included taxes benefits that have a higher than 50% chance of being realised.
Replying to @joshrauh
Zucman also takes issue with the 50% litigation-survival assumption we use in the paper, as he is seemingly confused about where we obtained the figure. We advise him to actually read the paper.
We explicitly disclose this as a modeling parameter, which was informed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s guidance on uncertain tax provisions (i.e., ASC 740-10).
Considering litigation effects should not come as a surprise to a tax economist. The Joint Committee on Taxation similarly considers “compliance, administration, and enforcement issues that could affect the timing or amounts of revenues collected” when scoring a tax bill. 10/14
Machiavelli argues that the few are motivated not by a desire for material well being but to be recognised as superiors. This is an affront to that feeling of superiority and exceptionality.
What amazes me is the attitude of so many of the centibillionaires.
A 5% tax will not make any difference to the way they live. Their spending may be extravagant, but it is still much less than their (correctly measured) income.
They know that, as gifted as some of them indeed are, they have benefited from extreme luck (and the help of the state, and, to speak like an economist, monopoly rents).
They know that their effective tax rate is low, relative to what many others pay.
They know that extreme inequality is extremely unpopular, and can lead to political unrest, backlash, or worse.
They must admit that, morally, it is hard to argue for a society in which some become obscenely wealthy, while so many are poor and see their income stagnate.
They typically have not indicated that they are building their wealth to eventually make the world a better place.
But they are still willing to fight the tax, spending hundreds of millions in California to avoid paying the tax. Why?
They simply think what is theirs is theirs, end of story.
They believe in the slippery slope, and if they do not take a stand on this levy, the government will come back for more.
They hate the state and the notion that their money will be misused?
Or?
Indentured labour holding together the British welfare state like duct tape
Exclusive:
Shabana Mahmood is fighting a rearguard action to save her migration reforms in the face of mounting public criticism from cabinet colleagues
The home secretary is under pressure to water down her plans to make it harder for foreign workers to claim permanent residence
Andy Burnham, the prime minister, is considering exempting care workers from plans to extend the qualifying period for claiming indefinite leave to remain (ILR) from five years to 15 years
However, the Home Office has argued that the move could backfire because it could lead to an exodus of foreign care workers from their jobs once they gained permanent residence and were no longer bound by the terms of their visas
A senior ally of Mahmood said she retained Burnham’s broad support over the plans: “Andy has been on Shabana’s side throughout this row over ILR. He is holding the line.”
thetimes.com/article/1a6e1a3…
Steven Klein retweeted
This Hoover Institution study, which has fueled the deluge of ads (more than $200 million spent by billionaires so far) to defeat the California billionaire tax, is spectacularly misleading.
Let me explain its crucial flaw. 🧵
California's Billionaire Tax Act would collect roughly $30 billion. Accounting for lost income taxes from departures, the mean Net Present Value is negative $39 billion, from Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh nber.org/papers/w35899
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Zucman argues that the tax will raise his projected revenue because billionaires who leave CA after 1/1/26 will be taxed anyway.
At least $542B of net worth (Page, Brin, Thiel) departed the state by 12/31/25.
The entire thread is a misleading denial of this fact.
ft.com/content/d66976…
nytimes.com/2026/04/27/us/…
forbes.com/sites/forbeswe…




















