nk

soferns nicht nötig is fänd ich das aufdränglich manchmal haben chicks aber auch 4x diesen hier drin, weiß nicht ob die bekloppt sind, oder es einfach auch mit 0 Effort trotzdem gut für sie funktioniert

mein cope wär, dass er dann besser weiß was er mag, was er will

In designs I can ignore it relatively well, because I'm confident the style will go through phases. Where it makes me physically ill is in front of food places.

Ich hätte ja gesagt es ist nichtmal sein vid, aber das signaling mit dem "zufällig" in die Aufnahme ragende Mishima Buch widerlegt meine These 😂

The blue bar LaTeX slides have also never gone out of style in several decades, despite infinite possibilities. I attribute it to laziness but also the perception (probably justified?) that more effort just results in an information style contrary to our recipients expectation.

I'm broadly larping as a homosexual. Relatedly, big fan of flamboyant fashion. Lowkey hitting on dudes for fun, etc. I'm calling it faggot maxxing - this way you can trigger both the right- and leftoids. There's also various associated tactics to offset deluded SF "rationalists".

There's an nLab page, "Red Herring Principle", tracking ways to which math terms oxymoron-eskly evolved. Say "multivalued function" "manifold with boundary" Softer is "DC comics" or "ATM machine". In such manner, I still refuse to apply mog, "alpha Male Of the Group" to women.

ReLU(x) = max(0, x) and generally m := max(z, x) = ((x+z)+|x-z|) · 0.5 In fact, for any symmetric two-ary B, B(m-x, m-z) = B(0,+|x-z|) It's also how you get that LogSumExp formula (pic) Here a ReLU identity I like: Var(X) = E[ReLU(X - X₂)²] with X₂ an independent copy of X

Good luck to you. I try to figure out how to prime it also, it's a bit of work and not easy to gauge when something went well in testing.