sb (@sunboud0) header
sb (@sunboud0) profile picture

Yield enjoyer - Building @21Advisory1

Joined September 2024
Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)Photo by sb (@sunboud0)
Two USD savings strategies. Instant withdrawal. No minimum. The 21app is now in beta. Join the waitlist: 21advisory.fr/#waitlist
1
1
47
Regarding apxUSD, I think in situations like these, it's less about the objective backing and more about timing/sentiment. It doesn't matter if the "stable" is technically overcollateralised; if you are sitting in a PT-apyUSD market on Morpho, leveraged up to the tits and paying 25% on your borrows, you aren't too inclined to wait and find out, just because the dashboard on the internet tells you it's all fine. There are many others like you with tens of millions in this cool new revolutionary, totally safe, stable asset, but there is now only $10M left in the Curve LP and even though you are 300% certain in Saylor's ability to pull through and cook all the haters, in a couple of days, all the yield you've been earning for the past two months will be wiped out, even if the depeg reverts. So you withdraw and sell.
3
2
2
28
8,217
When I hear people say DeFi looping is crazy and it doesn't exist in real world 🙄. My bro, its been in TradFi all along! When Blackstone bought Hilton for $26B and borrowed $20B: - Lenders earned a fixed yield and were senior to Blackstone. - Blackstone got the leveraged upside if it worked out but also take the downside if it doesn't. Potentially wiped out on the equity. That’s exactly looping. Lenders: senior, safer, more predictable returns. Borrowers/Loopers: bigger returns but contingent on execution, skill, and management (same as when you are managing these loops). Looping as a concept is not new, it just looks foreign because before DeFi it was only accessible to institutions.
6
12
1
138
12,993
This is the story of Hyperliquid, the most profitable startup per employee on earth, told from a guarded office in Singapore. Last year, its team of 11 generated $900 million in profit. It's 3 years old, has never taken a dollar of venture capital, and is beginning to change how century-old markets work. Its founder, Jeffrey Yan (@chameleon_jeff), had never taken a physics class when he picked up a textbook at 16. Two years later, he won gold at the International Physics Olympiad. In 2019, he started trading with $10,000 from a living room in Puerto Rico—working off a television because he didn't own a monitor. Within 3 years, he was running one of the largest anonymous crypto trading firms. Then he shut it down. Yan was rich and free, but he had spent years inside crypto, watching it betray itself. Bitcoin's central premise was decentralization. Yet the biggest exchanges were centralized. Crypto kept reintroducing the dependence on trust it was built to eliminate. He set out to create what should have existed. Hyperliquid is a blockchain with a trading exchange on top, and anyone can build on it. Yan's vision is to house all of finance. In 3 years, it has done over $4 trillion in volume. And in the past few months, it has begun to outgrow crypto. Markets for oil, silver, and the S&P 500 now trade on Hyperliquid around the clock, weekends included, and are growing roughly 40% week on week. When the US and Israel bombed Iran on a Saturday in February, Hyperliquid was the venue traders turned to. Hyperliquid's success has cost Yan his freedom. He works out of a secret office in Singapore and cannot travel without two bodyguards. Even the team's housekeeper doesn't know what they do. In January, @domcooke spent a week at their office. Read his profile on Yan and @HyperliquidX below.
425
981
500
5,261
3,825,213
Would love a mainstream real-time list of admin rights for DeFi applications, based on the results, they would get ranked: 1. "DeFi" 2. "Timed-locked DeFi" 3. "CeDeFi" 4. "Regulated instrument with onchain component" 5. "Stablecoin-receiving Blackbox"
People might accuse me of grave dancing for saying it But we have to stop letting centralized things call themselves DeFi Admin key can drain all funds? CeFi Otherwise DeFi means nothing and it’s brand is destroyed No admin key can drain any version of Uniswap for a reason
11
5
57
6,135
An aphorism from I don’t know who/when: “When people are worried about the future, they buy gold. When people are worried about the present, they sell gold.” Will be interesting to see if that plays out.
46
192
33
2,206
491,313
Just so i have said it publicly on here: I think the whole Michael Saylor bitcoin adventure will end up with the biggest blow up we have seen in the history of crypto. My analysis of his strategy does not find a mistake, but i base this on my intuition, something just feels very off about this Or he will end up with almost all of the bitcoin, which is just as bad Either way, no happy ending to this story in my opinion Hope i am wrong on this, but when i see yield promises of 11.5% combined with CT en masse saying bitcoin will moon again...all my intuitive alarm-bells go off
264
39
9
929
122,794
sb retweeted
$2.13 billion of bitcoin was bought here.
13
15
2
289
24,424
sb retweeted
In 2025, Hyperliquid became one of the leading venues for spot crypto trading through Unit. Some highlights for this past year: + $56B total spot volume + $3.16B peak 24h volume + $1.48B peak TVL + 11 spot markets deployed + Day 1 launches: Pump, Plasma, Monad
56
56
4
455
27,442
Revising my thesis on $ENA, a lot has changed in the last few days. Probably circling the drain too. With @Bybit_Official launching $BYUSDT, and Binance having $FDUSD, they are effectively internalizing the funding rate basis trade. Whatever privileged treatment @ethena was getting, they'll obviously prioritize themselves and essentially cut Ethena out. A huge reason for the massive increase in $USDe circulating supply was looping and collateralizing on CEX. With 1:1 redeemability and 100% collateralization ratios, USDe is obsolete. I thought that @hyenatrade could be a bullish catalyst, but now with @HyperliquidX enabling portfolio margin soon, USDe will once again become superfluous. Basis traders and USDe loopers/delta neutral funds and farmers will flock to Hyperliquid and use USDH to run that trade instead. Ethena had a great run, the founders and farmers made hundreds of millions of $, but I think it will slowly grind down and face the same doom loop that so many other protocols face; needing to subsidize users with a token that is down only. Unlikely to short because:crime, but no longer looking to buy dips on it or farm $ENA rewards. Don't imagine the unwind will be painful, but the risks of one are higher than a week ago.
23
7
11
241
77,150
Here are two thoughts that immediately come to mind: 1/ It’s funny that Vlad seems to think it’s normal to make side deals and use @Lighter_xyz airdrop allocation as a settlement tool with third parties — outside the public Points program. 2/ The claim that they had no relationship with the $5M LLP liquidity provider is obviously FALSE. It’s a small amount, and given Lighter devs connections, it was almost certainly either their own capital or money from “friends.” Most likely the team pooled funds and effectively “split” part of the airdrop this way. I also have no doubt the team holds a significant amount of tokens directly from the Points program as well (which, to be clear, I’m not even criticizing).
8
3
1
105
14,775
I spent 100’s of hours writing research on tether for @Citi. @CryptoHayes missed a few key points. 1) 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐬 =/ 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐬 When tether generates $ they have a separate equity balance sheet which they don’t report publicly. The numbers they disclose are under a ‘matching’ philosophy; they’re just showing you how their reserves are backed. The equity balance is sheet is made up of equity investments, mining operations, corporate reserves & possibly more BTC, with the rest distributed as dividends to shareholders. 2) 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐠𝐚𝐩𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐞𝐭. Tether has ~$120bn in interest yielding treasuries which have been yielding ~4% since 2023. That’s ~$10bn in liquid PnL with little cost (150 employees), making it one of the most efficient cash generating businesses in the world. I’m guessing this would make their equity worth somewhere in the $50-100bn range. Although they’ve reported they’re looking to raise $20bn for 3% which would put them at ~$500bn+ valuation. Probably won’t materialise, and likely overvalued, but still highly valuable equity. 3) 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐬 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬. 𝟓-𝟏𝟓% 𝐨𝐟 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐥𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐝 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝟖𝟓%+ 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐝 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐬. Tether is different but holds similar qualities to a Bank in this regard, and is significantly better collateralised. A key difference is banks are backed by Lender of last resort (Central Bank) but Tether is not. TLDR: Tether isn’t going insolvent, quite the opposite; they own a money printing machine.
The Tether folks are in the early innings of running a massive interest rate trade. How I read this audit is they think the Fed will cut rates which crushes their interest income. In response, they are buying gold and $BTC that should in theory moon as the price of money falls. A roughly 30% decline in the gold + $BTC position would wipe out their equity, and then USDT would be in theory insolvent. I'm sure some large holders and exchanges will demand a real-time view of their B/S so they can assess the solvency risk of Tether. Get out your popcorn, I expect the MSM to run wild with this, especially all the editors with TDS who want to shit on Lutnick and Cantor for backing this stablecoin.
175
240
86
1,867
630,159
> aave stables yield: 4.65% usdt, 5.09% usdc > usd30y yield: 4.704% if you've exited crypto and want to park in stables and don't care about borrowing, is the 0.3% extra yield worth the smart contract & security risk? might be one of the more compelling arguments against crypto. we talk about how crypto will replace traditional banking systems but is it actually a good place to passively store wealth u see protocols getting hacked, people getting drained left and right, kidnapped id pay 0.3% a year not to get $5 wrenched but that's just me for crypto to really be worthwhile to most then the yields need to be compelling when adjusted for risk. depositor protections play a role here for sure
20
4
2
62
11,397
Yesterday, an external fund manager overseeing Stream funds disclosed the loss of approximately $93 million in Stream fund assets. In response, Stream is in the process of engaging Keith Miller and Joseph Cutler of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP, to lead a comprehensive investigation into the incident. We are actively withdrawing all liquid assets and expect this process to be completed in the near term To keep our stakeholders informed, we will provide periodic updates as additional information becomes available. Until we are able to fully assess the scope and causes of the loss, all withdrawals and deposits will be temporarily suspended. Any pending deposits will not be processed at this time. Our decision to retain Perkins Coie LLP reflects Stream’s unwavering commitment to transparency and robust corporate governance.
168
552
1,046
2,924,722
ALERT! @Balancer and several forked projects have been attacked. Any forked projects should stay alert and monitor closely! The losses were as follows: Eth: balancer, 70m Base: balancer, 3.9m Polygon: balancer, 117k Sonic: beets, 3.4m Arb: balancer, 5.9m Op: beethoven, 283k
16
33
23
161
176,795