
ALT Opinion ME / Chronic fatigue syndrome Abandoned, dismissed and gaslighted: there is no excuse for the way ME sufferers have been betrayed George Monbiot George Monbiot Changes in guidance and science seem to have little impact on millions of devastated lives. It’s a shocking social crisis playing out behind closed doors Thu 24 Sep 2026 01.00 EDT Somebody sitting on a bed looking at a wall with a display of negative past medical experiences Illustration: Bill Bragg/The Guardian

ALT Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome-a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT Carolyn E Wilshire 1 , Tom Kindlon 2 , Robert Courtney 3 , Alem Matthees 4 , David Tuller 5 , Keith Geraghty 6 , Bruce Levin 7 Affiliations Expand PMID: 29562932 PMCID: PMC5863477 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3 Abstract Background: The PACE trial was a well-powered randomised trial designed to examine the efficacy of graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome. Reports concluded that both treatments were moderately effective, each leading to recovery in over a fifth of patients. However, the reported analyses did not consistently follow the procedures set out in the published protocol, and it is unclear whether the conclusions are fully justified by the evidence. Methods: Here, we present results based on the original protocol-specified procedures. Data from a recent Free

ALT Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome-a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT Carolyn E Wilshire 1 , Tom Kindlon 2 , Robert Courtney 3 , Alem Matthees 4 , David Tuller 5 , Keith Geraghty 6 , Bruce Levin 7 Affiliations Expand PMID: 29562932 PMCID: PMC5863477 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3 Abstract Background: The PACE trial was a well-powered randomised trial designed to examine the efficacy of graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome. Reports concluded that both treatments were moderately effective, each leading to recovery in over a fifth of patients. However, the reported analyses did not consistently follow the procedures set out in the published protocol, and it is unclear whether the conclusions are fully justified by the evidence. Methods: Here, we present results based on the original protocol-specified procedures. Data from a recent Free

























