If you missed our latest resource to support the professional development of physics teachers, find out more about the four dimensions of our subject knowledge framework at: spark.iop.org/framework
Congratulations to the new group of IOP Scholars. Today we welcomed them to the National Space Centre for the launch of their Scholarship Programme. They met their @ogdentrust mentors and took part in activities ranging from fluorescing tonic water to magnetic levitation.
Ian retweeted
All six Tory leadership contenders have pledged to fight VAT on private schools. Not one of them has promised more money for state schools. And there you have it.
Ian retweeted
Doctors looking after elderly people who were later found to be in the last 6 months of life ordered & repeated radiology tests - a diversionary behaviour to avoid talking about dying?
You know who you are. Or perhaps, more worryingly, you don't.
Well done, @JoeHawk75825077
New Research Publication fresh off the press.
Repeated radiological procedures in the last 6 months of life, a retrospective study.
spcare.bmj.com/cgi/rapidpdf/ā¦
@drkathrynmannix @ProfMarkTaubert @APM_Hub @ClareFuller17 @drol007 @DrNeilStone @Existential_Doc
Ian retweeted
If the person youāre dunking on has a blue tick, they will literally be paid for the extra views your quote tweet gives them. Hope that illuminates the dynamics of this platform
Ian retweeted
Goveās free schools increase segregation and harm nearby schools, says study theguardian.com/education/arā¦
Ian retweeted
Nothing to see here, just the guy who bought Twitter having free speech explained to him by a cat
Ian retweeted
A key difference between the so called 'illegal' asylum seekers in hotels and the people trying to burn them down is that only the latter have actually done anything illegal.
It's not illegal to seek political asylum. It is however illegal to torch a building.
You're welcome.
Ian retweeted
This is a really excellent explainer.
Ian retweeted
A little while back I asked if people would be interested in a post about antisemitism in the EduTwitter community, and people said yes, so here it is:
This has been an issue for a while, and has bubbled over recently and sadly made it into the Jewish press. I want to first frame the discussion in the lived experience of 21st century Jews, and then get into specific things that should or should not be said.
Jews in this country are programmed to be worried about antisemitism. We've all experienced it personally (I have had people say antisemitic things to me directly and in person twice in the last three weeks) and, based on our history, feel like we are entitled to worry about it. Most people know something about the Holocaust, but might know less about how the Holocaust was not an isolated event, but the culmination of 1500 years of anti-Jewish hatred and prejudice (which today is called antisemitism). Name a country in the West or the Middle East, and I will tell you which year Jews there experienced pogroms, forced conversions, generalised state-sponsored and informal persecution, expulsions and more. Itās not been pretty, and whilst the Holocaust was worse than any one of those events, it should be seen as a link in a chain. Not the end of a chain, a link in a chain.
Antisemitism hasnāt always been obvious. Whilst there are common themes, it takes different guises in different places and at different times. All of these guises are dangerous, and all have resulted in catastrophic persecutions in the past. We are therefore trained to be on high alert, and to work on an assumption that
A. if someone says they hate you, assume they mean it,
B. if someone says they hate you, assume they also want to kill you,
C. if someone wants to kill you, assume that they would kill you given the chance and
D. that things can seem fine one day and nobody wants to kill you, and then suddenly become very not fine indeed.
So yes, we are sensitive about antisemitism. And we have good reason to be so.
In light of the above, letās look at some things that you should not say. All of the items below are things that (prominent) educators have said within the last four weeks.
1. Comparisons with the Holocaust/Naziism: the Holocaust is a tremendously distinctive historical event. Whilst making historical comparisons is an important part of academic historical discourse, comparing events with the holocaust should be approached with extreme care, and a better knowledge of the specific events than most seem to have. Unfortunately, the term āNaziā has come to mean ābad personā and Holocaust āevil event,ā but whilst the Nazis were bad people and the Holocaust was an evil event, not all bad people come anywhere close to being as bad as the Nazis, and not all evil events come anywhere close to being as evil as the Holocaust.
The Holocaust wasn't so long ago, and most Jews in the UK will have grandparents, greatgrandparents or other family members who were touched by it. It is an important part of our identities. I would suggest, as a general rule, don't compare things to the Holocaust. If you think some kind of contemporary event or school policy or whatever is similar to the Holocaust or Naziism, it probably isn't. This doesn't mean that you can't say if you think a thing is bad or evil. But because it is possible to express your worry about things without invoking the Holocaust, this is the route you should take.
Broadly, the reasoning here is twofold:
A. Objectively, most normal people look at the systematic organised enslavement and murder of six million people and think, "yeah, there's nothing else going on right now that's even close to that."
B. Since the Holocaust, antisemites have been denying or downplaying the Holocaust, as part of an explicitly racist agenda that would repeat its events if it could.
Therefore, it's best to just not do this. If you think something is really bad and awful, go right ahead and say so, but don't use the Holocaust or Nazis as an analogy.
2. Jews owning the media: this feeds into classic antisemitic tropes about some kind of global agenda of Jews to control the world. The most famous expression of this is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a fictitious text designed to demonise Jews, and to whip up hatred.
As above, you should not do this because:
A. Objectively, it is inaccurate at every level.
B. It has been used for centuries, and continues to be used today, to drive real hatred and persecution of random Jewish people, who are normally surprised when they are told that they are extremely powerful people, especially given that we can't even get good quality kosher cheese or people to agree on whether the synagogue should have pews or tables, let alone control the media.
Talking about Jews owning the media is a racist trope, and there is no excuse for any educated person to be using it.
3. That calling out antisemitism of types 1 or 2 above, but not simultaneously criticising Israel, is hypocritical: this isn't quite logical (not everybody has to care about everything equally for their opinions to be valid), but it also falls into the most common contemporary trap of letting your dislike of Israel spill over into criticising random Jews. Israel is a country Over There. We UK Jews live in a country Over Here. Please let us talk about domestic antisemitism without also expecting us to talk about Israel. Don't expect us to have an opinion, don't expect us to say anything at all. Because if you do, it's like you're tying us together, which is A. inaccurate and B. prejudicial.
After 9/11 and 7/7 a terrible element of discourse generated around expecting British Muslims, who live Over Here, to condemn some event that has nothing to do with them and happened/was planned Over There. This was racist and Islamophobic, so please let's not repeat that. Criticise Israel all you like - fine by me - but unless you're replying directly to something I've said on the topic, leave me out of it.
4. Supporting terrorist groups: this is a pretty easy one. There are terrorist groups. There is a list of them here: gov.uk/government/publicatioā¦ā¦ It is illegal to support them. These are not nice people. They are responsible for death and destruction across the world.
Some of them have nothing to do with Jews, some of them want Jews dead.
Do not support these groups. Do not show ambiguity about whether or not you support these groups.
Ok, thatās four good things to avoid. Finally, some things to expect:
If you say that Jews control the media or you downplay the Holocaust, expect to be called out on it, without a huge amount of politeness.
If you conflate Israel with Jews in this country, expect to be politely challenged on it. Personally, I have time for āthings an educated person could slip up onā, and like to think I would be polite, patient and explanatory in a circumstance like this.
If you support a terrorist group, expect to be called out on it, without a huge amount of politeness.
We have therefore seen:
Antisemitism is real and scary for Jews
Comparing events to the holocaust is not wise
Never talk about Jews owning or controlling the media
Disentangle Jews Over Here from Israel Over There
Terrorist groups are not our friends
Donāt expect people to be ok with you saying antisemitic things
A final point is that I think the above should be pretty clear cut and obvious to people. If you have any questions, provided they are asked in a charitable and open spirit, I'd be happy to answer. DMs open.
Ian retweeted
VAT at the standard rate of 20% Ā will be added to private school fees Jan 1st 2025. It will apply to any fees paid in advance for that term from today. The government says it will also legislate to remove the business rates charitable rates relief. assets.publishing.service.goā¦
Ian retweeted
The "research" cited here was commissioned by Tory SPADs to discredit the Labour policy.
We had an independent analysis from the IFS, and it backs up the Labour assumptions.
NEW VAT on school fees could raise less than half the sum expected - why private schools are calling for an independent analysis of Labour govās tax plans ā¦@HMC_Orgā© ā¦@ISC_schoolsā©
thetimes.com/article/bb2f316ā¦
Ian retweeted
X, formerly Twitter, posted about a way to keep its AI chatbot, Grok, from training on your data.
Link:
lifehacker.com/tech/hot-to-sā¦
Ian retweeted
Super interesting and insightful annual report from @TeacherTapp on the key trends and challenges with teacher recruitment and retention. Recommend giving it a read if you havenāt already.
teachertapp.co.uk/publicatioā¦
Far too many women have been on the receiving end of harassment, abuse and violence for far too long.
With violence against women and girls declared a āNational Emergencyā, we need our male allies to stand up and call out troubling behaviour when they see it.
#JustDont ā at Yorkshire and The Humber, England
Ian retweeted
My article has been published! š¤©
If anyone reads it, please let me know what you think!
@theASE School Science Review In Practise issue 391 July 2024
Ian retweeted
MY NEW BOOK!
Iām having some pretty big feelings about this book.
Itās out next month. I hope it helps people. I had 100 neurodivergent co-authors and between us I think weāve crafted something pretty special.
Please consider pre-ordering: amzn.to/4fhKTwA
Ian retweeted
This is just ignorant character assassination.
Becky has been working perfectly amicably with the Tory government for years as head of the Education Endowment Foundation.
Having written academic papers on gender doesn't stop you caring about knowledge and skills.
I am seriously concerned about the appointment of someone to rewrite our school curriculum whose work has been so focussed on identity politics. Children need knowledge, skills & virtues - not a destructive focus on false concepts of gender, race & power. telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07ā¦


































