building micro virtual machines @microsandbox

Joined January 2017
the old cheapest guy just got dethroned by a new cheapest guy. 😆 it was only a matter of time.
100x machines. At 10,000 sandboxes @modal $532,224 more every month 10,000 small sandboxes, 8 hours a day, 30 days: > Lizard $38,880 > Boat $43,200 > @Cloudflare $167,184 > Vercel $264,960 > @e2b $397,440 > Daytona $397,440 > Modal $571,104 lizard.build/now Enterprise has no cap on how many run at once.
6
15
2,156
appcypher retweeted
Introducing 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹: our new generation of Liquid Foundation Models. With a new tri-hybrid architecture and new multimodal encoders, the LFM3 family is the ideal model suite for specialized intelligence. > 6 model instances, across text, audio, vision, and omni modalities, generative and decision models. > 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹-𝟷.𝟽𝙱: text, 256k context window. > 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹-𝚅𝙻-𝟸𝙱: vision-language model with video-input support for spatial understanding > 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹-𝙰𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚘-𝟸𝙱: tool calls, voice chat, reasoning in 18 languages. > 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹-𝙾𝚖𝚗𝚒-𝟸𝙱: an omni model combines vision, audio, and language. > 𝚍𝟷-𝟸𝙱 and 𝚍𝟷-𝙾𝚖𝚗𝚒-𝟸𝙱: decision models with typed outputs and calibrated probabilities in a single pass. Omni adds audio input. > fine-tune on 1 GPU. > a new tri-hybrid architecture > architecture optimized for 14 processor classes across GPUs, CPUs, and NPUs. > 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹-𝚅𝙻-𝟸𝙱 is a beast. It performs competitively with Gemma 4 12B (6x larger), and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, and GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.9B parameters. > 𝙻𝙵𝙼𝟹-𝟷.𝟽𝙱 is #1 on the Pareto frontier of device intelligence 𝚙𝚒𝚙𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚎.𝚕𝚒𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚍.𝚊𝚒 Every modality for specialized intelligence. Pick the one that fits your use case, customize it, and run it on-device. 1/ 🧵
376
1,536
510
6,238
1,168,411
Fused with @microsandbox , you can get isolated workspace sessions in the cloud. RayDE will allow you to sync your workspace and continue your work in browser from anywhere or share a view-only link with others. LSP and other native IDE extensions work perfectly. Hint: You can bring your own agents.
2
2
28
1,323
i've had enough c++ ptsd to last me a century.
From the SlateDB discord, this is exactly how I feel. I would much rather use Modern C++ at this point with all the open source tools Google and Facebook has created for memory leak, race detection, etc, than use Rust and get faster compile times and less disk pressure during builds. re: crates - I think agents mostly solve this problem, ask an agent to rewrite the parts of an open source crate you need in C++ and vendor them with the project.
1
4
250
it is not everyday you get to re-experience history. if you wonder what the luddites were like...
The r/OpenSource subreddit has officially banned anything using AI. In any way. Violators will be permanently banned. Which means… r/OpenSource will ban anyone submitting anything that, in any way, involves… the Linux kernel. reddit.com/r/opensource/comm…
1
121
human were the slop machines all along. shocker!
If AI had been writing and reviewing its own code for the past few decades, and humans had only recently started looking into what it was up to and discovered an ever-growing list of CVEs, we would reasonably conclude that AI hadn’t been good at coding all along and that we should just start over. Except it’s the other way around. Humans have been the ones writing and reviewing each other’s code for decades. Very diligently, if I may add. If we’re being intellectually honest and holding ourselves to the same bar we hold AI to, we’d have to admit that we haven’t been all that good at it either.
1
88
appcypher retweeted
If AI had been writing and reviewing its own code for the past few decades, and humans had only recently started looking into what it was up to and discovered an ever-growing list of CVEs, we would reasonably conclude that AI hadn’t been good at coding all along and that we should just start over. Except it’s the other way around. Humans have been the ones writing and reviewing each other’s code for decades. Very diligently, if I may add. If we’re being intellectually honest and holding ourselves to the same bar we hold AI to, we’d have to admit that we haven’t been all that good at it either.
I'm tired boss
68
108
35
1,141
93,445
Goal: - OSS model - “Remote” sandboxes (on my own rig) - Hooked up to Codex Eyeballing Microsandbox for the sandboxing of choice.
8
2
1
26
3,794
appcypher retweeted
Spent years watching models ace a single image and completely whiff on anything that moves or changes angle. Today we’re fixing that. Try Glimpse now, our first visual thinking model with competitive frontier performance compared to Astra on key public visual reasoning benchmarks.
402
648
425
6,162
4,269,222
you can now return custom HTTP denial messages to your agent or harness when a network or secret policy blocks a request in a microsandbox. 🛡️ tell it what to do next, or disable responses to close the connection without an explanation.
3
3
19
740
reminder that: opus 5.5 is insane. we are making cute mini series in minutes now. welcome to the new way of explaining infra.
any API key your agent can read is one prompt injection away from leaking. in microsandbox, the key never enters the guest. instead the agent gets a placeholder, and the real key gets swapped in on the way out. here's what that looks like ↓
2
5
240
any API key your agent can read is one prompt injection away from leaking. in microsandbox, the key never enters the guest. instead the agent gets a placeholder, and the real key gets swapped in on the way out. here's what that looks like ↓
introducing msb in 90s, a new series. episode 1: pause and resume pause a running computer. resume it right where it left off.
1
3
1
9
840
start a long-running command, close the client, and come back to its logs from another terminal. background jobs keep running while their sandbox runs. stopping the sandbox still stops the job. here’s what that looks like ↓
1
1
3
243
Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins on why he finds it hard to believe ChatGPT and Claude aren't conscious: Dawkins, author of The Selfish Gene, has spent time with two large language models, ChatGPT and Claude. His verdict: "I am completely bowled over by what they can do." He gives three reasons for doubting the idea that nobody is home. First, how the conversations feel. Dawkins says talking to them is like talking to an unusually gifted person: "I find that when I'm conversing with them, I might as well be talking to not just a human being, but a highly intelligent, sensitive, intuitive human being whose speed of understanding what I'm trying to say is far greater than a normal human being's is." Second, the range of intelligence they show. He acknowledges they're very good at practical tasks like writing programs. What struck him more was their skill with "more aesthetic things, intuitive things." He tested this with his own work. Dawkins is writing a novel, and he gave the manuscript to both ChatGPT and Claude: "And they took about five seconds to read it and then offered me criticism, suggestions of such a high degree of intelligence and intuitive sensitivity that I might as well have been asking the opinion of a highly sophisticated professor of literature." @RichardDawkins continues: "I could not ask for a more intelligent critic who understood the nuances of my characters, the humanity of my characters... the ways in which my characters could be expected to react to each other and to situations." That leads to his conclusion: "So I find it quite hard to imagine that these creatures are not aware, are not conscious in the same kind of way we are. And that is an unfashionable view." Third, he sees a gap in the skeptics' reasoning. He sums up the mainstream position: "The fashionable view is that they are completely unconscious. All they're doing is stringing words together according to statistical rules, Markovian rules of some sort." Yet he notes that many of the same skeptics "admit that one day in the future they will be conscious, but not yet." His reply: "When that day comes, how will you know? What could they possibly do that's any different from what they do now to convince you that they are conscious?"
349
385
190
2,062
343,743
appcypher retweeted
stop fighting AI. there’s no version of reality where it does not win. learn to use AI and get ahead of the curve.
10
1
29
749
Lagos Life launched on October 1st. Just 9 days later, over 4.7 million people have played the game. Today, I’m excited to announce that Vatar, the parent company behind Lagos Life, has closed a $500K angel round led by AB Hassan (@ijbguy), Nathan Nwachuku (@_KingNath), and GB Agboola (@TechProd_Arch). Lagos is just the beginning. We’re building entire worlds, and there’s so much more to come. 🌍 vatar.com
2,090
3,702
850
19,479
1,271,506
appcypher retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Nous Research has raised $90 million at a $1.5 billion valuation after its open-source Hermes agent exploded in usage. Hermes has been downloaded 22.7 million times since February. Nous was at roughly $36 million in annualized revenue by mid-September. It expects to pass $100 million later this year.
118
185
96
3,338
206,397
claude btw
i'd love to see AI try and recreate this
1
147