American Photographer — publishing one million photographs.

San Francisco, CA
Joined December 2006
Ruby Rippey breaks cover after salacious essay exposed Gavin Newsom affair details trib.al/NvH5XbD
4
12
2
50
9,920
Thomas Hawk retweeted
The Governor’s Office has released its official 250th anniversary portrait.
Happy 250th, America. 🇺🇸 I love this country. Our freedoms, our values, and our core beliefs are always worth fighting for.
30
165
11
1,322
23,920
Thomas Hawk retweeted
🎥May 19 2026 7:01pm Location Safeway on Church Street San Francisco the land of lawlessness crime is Down, but you still have people going in stores and stealing whatever they can get and take it to 16th & Mission to sell. But statistics report say crime is down I guess they don’t categorize this as a crime because this is a 24 hour ordeal in San Francisco. Stay tuned for the interview from the two persons that was stealing and from the security guard.
23
54
3
265
39,892
Thomas Hawk retweeted
🎥April 06 2026 Location 400blk Leavenworth between Ellis & Eddy You have a parent out here that’s been here all night and morning smoking and selling Fentanyl with her young child with her.
44
103
28
291
20,690
Thomas Hawk retweeted
If you just got into an Ivy League college (or your kid did), you really ought to read this excellent post from @uaustinorg. There really are better ways to spend four formative years of your life.
To: Admitted Students on Ivy Decision Day From: UATX Congratulations. Getting in was hard and you should be proud. Now here’s some unsolicited advice so you don’t waste the next four years. Go to class. We know this sounds obvious. But as the New York Times reported recently, Harvard students routinely skip class, rarely speak up when they're there, and focus on their devices instead of the discussion. Faculty say few students do enough preparation to contribute meaningfully. The average college student spends about 20 hours a week on class and studying combined. At UATX, we aim for 50. That’s the difference between a part-time commitment and a full-time job. You (or your parents) are about to spend upwards of $90K a year. If you don't show up, you're paying roughly $250 per skipped lecture for the privilege of sleeping in. Read the books yourself. Your generation is the first to arrive at college post-literate — raised on short-form video, dependent on algorithms, and increasingly incapable of sitting with a difficult text long enough to let it change your mind. Ninety percent of college students use AI academically. This makes you more reliant on the authority of others. Most professors will also stand between you and the text. They’ll tell you what Marx “really meant,” what Aristotle “failed to see,” as though an academic in 2026 has outsmarted minds that shaped civilizations. The good professors do the opposite: they put you in front of the book and they work with you to find what a great mind has to teach us directly. Find those professors, and read everything yourself. Say what you actually think. Seventy-three percent of conservative students report withholding their political views in class out of fear their grades will suffer. Our advice isn't political; it's intellectual. If you spend four years learning to say what's expected instead of what's true, you’ll graduate roughly where you started — just older, more credentialed, and more practiced at self-censorship. One study finds that nearly half of students show no measurable gains in “critical thinking” after two years in college. Keep this in mind as you make decisions about which professors to take and how to do your assignments. Taking a small hit on your paper to gain integrity and wisdom is usually worth it. Ask for real grades. Sixty percent of Harvard undergraduate grades are now A’s. Twenty-five years ago, it was 20%. It got so bad that the legendary Harvard professor, Harvey Mansfield, started giving students two grades: the official one for their transcript, and a private one reflecting what they actually earned. He called the official grades “ironic.” So here's a suggestion: Take your A, but also ask your professors for a “Mansfield grade” so that you know where you stand. And don’t avoid difficult courses to keep your transcript clean for law school. Get work experience before you graduate. Forty-two percent of recent college graduates are working jobs that don't require a degree. Many employers are projecting the next few years to be the worst college grad job market in years. A degree alone — even from an Ivy — is not a job guarantee. Seek out apprenticeships, internships, and real work starting freshman year. The students at UATX are connected with entrepreneurs and business leaders from day one. Many will graduate with four years of work experience alongside their degree. You can build something similar at your school, but you'll have to do it yourself. Understand how debt shapes your life. If you're paying full freight or even half, do the math with your eyes open. Your decision to take on debt will quietly reshape the trajectory of your adult life through countless small surrenders: the job you take because it’s safe instead of starting the company. The city you choose to live in. The relationship you delay and the kids you don’t have. For women, a $1,000 increase in student loan debt lowers the odds of marriage by 2% per month in the first four years after graduation. None of that shows up in the college brochure. If you're going to take on debt, treat it like the constraint it is from day one: save aggressively and make sure every dollar is buying something that will actually compound in your favor. Find the people who take school seriously. The best thing about a great school isn't the lectures or the library. It's the handful of professors and students who are genuinely there to learn — who read ahead, argue in good faith, and push you to be sharper. Find them. UATX is a small community of those who seek a serious education. At a larger university, you have to build this community yourself. * The most dangerous thing about an elite university is that it is very easy to do nothing for four years and still come out looking successful. The transcript will say you excelled. The diploma with the fancy crest will open certain doors. Your parents will be proud. And yet you will have coasted — through inflated grades, unread books, and borrowed opinions. Getting in is an accomplishment. Making the next four years worth it will be harder, and the right decisions will change everything. We wish you luck.
11
67
3
571
435,520
Replying to @sfchronicle
I'm a paying Chronicle subscriber. your "senior political writer" Joe Garofoli @joegarofoli deliberately omitted Marie Hurabiell from his story. when I (and many others) pointed it out, he blocked me. pretending a candidate doesn't exist is a form of election manipulation.
11
39
5
179
3,859
Thomas Hawk retweeted
Didn't drive her car at an ICE agent. Didn't try to obstruct an ICE operation. Was just walking down the street when an illegal alien killed her in cold blood. And Democrats do not care.
1,686
23,421
593
119,815
1,906,473
My issue with politicians like @DanielLurie and @Scott_Wiener is that they don’t make a distinction between illegal immigrants who are breaking the law being here but not breaking other laws and the drug dealers pedaling fentanyl killing two people a day on city streets.
Replying to @DanielLurie
I wish you were this upset over illegal immigrants selling death on San Francisco streets.
10
14
120
3,369
There are now extensive back & forth with Newsom and others in the media regarding the exposure of massive fraud here in California. Anytime someone posts on social media about the massive fraud happening here, Newsom immediately shouts back on social that “we” are arresting people and punishing fraud. Just so we are all clear, most of us here in CA have known about the fraud crisis for a long time. And, anytime I see Newsom say anything about public safety - really all you have to say is “Gascón.” Newsom brought Gascón to SF. He appointed him SF police chief. He appointed him SFDA. He supported and endorsed him when he ran for SFDA. And he supported and endorsed him when he ran for LADA - twice. When Gascón took office in LA, almost all fraud type charges were considered $0 bail. Yes. The fraudsters were all just released. This was a written policy. Any enhancements for insurance fraud, check fraud, ID theft, credit card fraud, real estate fraud, medical services fraud, etc were removed completely. Gone. Even if we could prove them. Again, a written policy. So if there were elderly or vulnerable victims, a very high monetary loss and/or multiple victims - we were NOT allowed to charge enhancements. Ever. I never saw or heard Newsom make one peep about victims of fraud or what Gascón did to LA. Not one. Gascón and Newsom also supported Prop 47. That made most check fraud a misdemeanor. Gascón and Newsom also didn’t support Prop 36. Newsom is now all over our fraud crisis in CA, almost 7 years after he has been governor, because … the media is now involved. But a leader prioritizes public safety even when the media isn’t reporting on it. Our governor is supposed to care about how crime affects working families, the elderly, vulnerable victims, children and all of us … not just how he or she looks in the public eye.
61
480
33
1,615
65,566
San Francisco's Mayor Daniel Lurie and his upside-down priorities, ladies and gentlemen.
14
34
3
272
3,857
Democrat Senator John Fetterman SLAMS Gavin Newsom over mocking Nick Shirley for exposing fraud “Why can't you celebrate any journalist or any activist doing that? — Governor Newsom put out a disgusting video implying that he's a pedophile” Disgusting
57
566
19
3,477
41,803
Thomas Hawk retweeted
Fentanyl deaths went up 808% while he was governor. He held press conferences. He launched websites. He made announcements. People kept dying.
3
16
5
65
4,717
Hello Mr. Evans, Today, War on the Rocks published a "rebuttal" which disclosed the real-life identity of @CynicalPublius . What the article did not mention: you had already posted his name on Bluesky before the WOTR piece published. The WOTR article cited his being “already known” as justification for printing his name. The person who made him “already known” was you. You manufactured the predicate for your own publication’s decision. You then blocked me. And then called me out. Repeatedly. You engaged me, mentioned me, tagged me — even said publicly that you were looking forward to what I had written about War on the Rocks. Blocking someone on a platform and then continuing to publicly engage them is not what a person who wants to be left alone does. It is what a person who wants the attention without the accountability does. You're framing your own just desserts as a “mass witch hunt” initiated by a Hello post I addressed to Brad Duplessis, your contributor, who named Cynical Publius in his debut WOTR piece without disclosing that Anderson’s recommendations for War College reform included eliminating the kind of permanent civilian faculty position Duplessis holds. You are being dunked on because of what you did to Cynical Publius, not because of anything I wrote. Blaming the letter for the blowback is like blaming the smoke alarm for the fire. Cynical Publius wrote that military institutions had drifted from their original professional mission toward ideological conformity and required reform. You responded by publishing his name. The question your letter to me does not answer — and the question a lot of people are now asking — is why an outlet that once existed to challenge that kind of institutional behavior became the one enforcing it. You yourself provide answers to that question. You launched War on the Rocks because you understood something true: the United States had spent two decades losing wars it shouldn't have lost. Twelve years later, when a pseudonymous retired Army officer argues that the War Colleges have drifted from warfighting competence toward ideological conformity, the platform you built publishes his name in the opening sentence. That is not an accident of character. It is how institutions stop being able to learn. Armies that cannot receive criticism cannot conduct honest after-action review. Institutions that cannot correct what they're getting wrong keep losing — and keep being surprised that they're losing, because the people tasked with explaining the failures are the same people defending the institutions that produced them. In short: Mr. Evans, you have been captured by the foreign policy expert class has presided over Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. And you don't even realize it. Wake up. And be on the lookout for a Substack article where I explain your history more thoroughly.
561
4,972
247
18,049
573,936
Thomas Hawk retweeted
Forget about earthquakes; tolerance is the biggest threat to the city of San Francisco, which is a shadow of what it used to be. Allowing miscreants to run wild has just about ruined a once-great American metropolis. It’s infuriating. billoreilly.com/b/San-Franci…
133
159
16
1,045
42,536
“San Francisco is no longer a safe haven for those who want to sell drugs, do drugs and live on our streets,” @DanielLurie State of the City 1/15/2026 Also: bus shelter on 2/4/2026 Larkin/O’Farrell - Little Saigon #SanFrancisco
5
7
4
60
6,710
Thomas Hawk retweeted
San Francisco’s Revolt of the Center By Leighton Woodhouse "The Mission has become a magnet for drug dealers and drug addicts for the same reason the Tenderloin did: because of the high concentration of social services for homeless people there." americanaffairsjournal.org/2…
4
1
2
18
1,252
Thomas Hawk retweeted
The people. Steven. Rest in Paradise good buddy. June 25, 1989 - November 15, 2025
81
39
5
717
49,787
Gavin Newsom: You know damn well these protesters are funded. I’m willing to bet my tax dollars are part of what is helping them to keep this 💩 going. The lawlessness you and California dems embraced over the years is coming back to bite you. You got my fellow officers once again in a shit storm of your creation.
81
213
4
1,358
14,722
🚨 TIME IS RUNNING OUT—4 DAYS LEFT! Over $1M+ is being spent on this special election, but only 25% are projected to vote. Your voice matters—don’t let special interests decide Oakland’s future! Vote Loren Taylor & Kanitha Matoury #1 by April 15 to SAVE Oakland! 🗳️ Find your nearest voting location at KanithaForOakland.com/vote
2
6
18
1,515
Please—Tariff symmetry! A key to reducing the nearly $1 trillion trade imbalance and encouraging foreign investment is the idea that trade reciprocity and parity — roughly zero tariffs or identical /reciprocal tariffs between the U.S. and its trading partners—are our primary goals. That is a concept that the American people support wholeheartedly and even in extremis will continue to do so. But talk of either reparatory tariffs—additional fines on partners for their past asymmetrical tariffs—or higher tariffs on countries that either now run deficits with America or have little or no tariffs with the U.S.—will lose public support and only energize opposition to what otherwise is a rational and sympathetic American position on rectifying a half- century of chronic and mounting trade deficits. True, many countries level tariffs under insidiously Machiavellian conditions such as falsely constructed health and safety barriers, excise and VAT taxes, and currency manipulation. But those complexities should be left for round two of negotiations since for now the public is most concerned with “do onto to others as they would do onto to you” reciprocity. Getting to zero or identical tariffs with a host of current  mercantile trading nations would be an astounding accomplishment and one that the public needs to digest, appreciate, and savor — before in one fell swoop jeopardizing such historic corrections by trying to solve the entire half-century trade quagmire all at once — a task that will lose public support if countries are still tariffed after agreeing to zero or reciprocal tariffs with the U.S.
535
1,642
143
7,207
925,761