Charli⬠K!rk deserved it, I don't care if I get fired.
My name is JJ McCullough and I work for the IDF.
Pallassssssssssds
π¨π¨π¨ And that's a wrap! Our final Toronto poll for this election
@oliviachow - 53%
@BradMBradford - 43%
#TOpoli
There is no fucking way π
oh my god bruh
So, who did I vote for in Torontoβs mayoral election? And why?
A few observations first.
Despite all the attention paid to the mayor, it is a relatively weak position. Even with βstrong mayorβ powers, council is independently elected, City Hall is a vast bureaucracy, and many of our problems are downstream of provincial failures.
The job is more constrained than the rhetoric suggests.
Both @oliviachow and @BradMBradford are decent people who care about Toronto. Chow also deserves credit for difficult decisions, including raising property taxes after years of avoidance.
But with those considerations in mind, I cast my vote for BRADFORDΒ²
Firstly, Iβve known him for years. His understanding of planning, municipal finance, bureaucracy and economics stands above most councillors. Heβs a planner by trade, and even where heβs moderated on housing, I think he gets its details better than nearly anyone whoβs run for mayor in decades.
Thereβs also plenty in his platform I agree with. The land transfer tax is a dumb tax, and I ran on abolishing it provincially. Brad wants to substantially reduce it.
His proposed municipally owned water corporation also makes sense. We should finance infrastructure over its useful life, and I proposed a provincial framework for similar municipal models.
Frankly, much of the hysterical response has been financially illiterate. There are fair questions about debt and governance, but treating public ownership as privatization is absurd.
I appreciate his commitments on what makes a city work. Dynamic traffic signals, transit priority, and a TTC focused on speed and reliability rather than simply keeping fares down.
And as I recently wrote for the Toronto Star, public order is fundamental to quality of life. I think Brad understands that in a way Chow and many of her allies donβt seem to.
But here is where Iβve felt most disappointed with Chowβs leadership.
If weβre going to elect a progressive mayor, I want them to actually fight for progressive things. On sixplexes and neighbourhood retail, weβve normalized the idea that individual councillors get to decide whether basic city-building reforms apply in their wards.
This is one of the worst governing precedents weβve set in years. Iβd have preferred much greater compromises, provided the rules applied citywide. Instead, I worry weβve set Toronto back decades, and invited the same ward-by-ward veto on future reforms.
Yes, Brad voted for the sixplex compromise, which I disagree with. But a mayor needs to organize the politics behind a citywide vision, the buck on this one stopped there.
Likewise on Ontario Place, Exhibition Place, bike lanes, and the airport. Even if the province has the stronger hand, why not offer an alternative vision worth rallying around rather than get steamrolled?
Then thereβs the vacant home tax. It was created before Chow, but the rollout was under her leadership. We now require every homeowner to prove, every year, that their home isnβt vacant. Why not declare once and update it when you move or sell? The tolerance for this sort of mindless bureaucracy drives me nuts.
I disagree with Brad on other issues, including bike lanes, or the focus on involuntary care over increased capacity in our drug treatment systems.
But I admire how he responded to his last loss, and the energy and tenacity he put in after.
And yes, being under 45 matters to me.
I value someone who understands the affordability pressures of building a life here personally, not just conceptually.
I would happily vote for a mayor considerably more progressive than Brad. That isnβt my objection to Chow. I just donβt see the vision. Often it seems like the goal is simply to have the βright peopleβ in charge. To do what? I couldnβt tell you.
Brad my friend, good luck on Monday. Should you win, do justice to why you wanted to be in politics, all those years ago. Good luck!
Vilhelms π¨π¦πͺπΊπ±π» retweeted
#IA03
WaPo: Woman in ad who said a Democrat endangers kids pleaded guilty to endangering kids
Shellie Flockhart, who called Iowa Democratic House candidate Sarah Trone Garriott βdangerousβ for kids, pleaded guilty after authorities said she drove drunk with her children in the car in 2017.
Link to article: washingtonpost.com/politics/β¦























