
|| Crypto Brand Strategist || Venture Capitalist || $MERRYCAT || $TENDER BNB
Universe
Joined July 2024
- Tweets37.2K
- Following4.8K
- Followers4.8K
- Likes57.9K
Pinned Tweet
Sometimes, you'll wonder why you're into crypto ππππππ
This industry no funny at all ππ
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
Replying to @very_common_guy
The only way out now is if real Christians start calling them out for the frauds they are. And if possible, involve legal charges against them.
You no go see Muslims dey do the kind shit wey Christians dey do for crypto space all in the name of religion.
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
Replying to @very_common_guy
Captain, that's the issue , everyone want to be a Dev ..Most of them are either yahoo boys , jobless guys or undergraduate boys.
I joined one project space on X , and I was totally disappointed cos the Dev and his team are bunch of young lads . From the way they are talking and all.. Captain!. these guys will rug people.
My life right now πππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
Keep holding πππ
My life don spoil completely πππ
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
Africa crypto devs after selling false hope to their community ππ
@very_common_guy
My eyes have seen my anus πππ
African crypto Devs, why?????
@ihechukwu22
Replying to @very_common_guy
African thieves not devs.
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
Devs and Kols in African crypto space, including projects associated with #SMC DAO.
Imagine a space where people claim to be Christians, prophets, and believers, yet some have turned the name of God and the language of prophecy into marketing tools for cryptocurrency projects.
Almost every project is tagged as prophetic. Someone claims to have received a vision from God, another says the Lord gave them a token, and before you know it, people are putting their money into these projects because they believe they are participating in something spiritually inspired.
But what happens afterwards?
Where are the tangible results?
I have seen more than five projects carrying the prophetic label, presented as visions from God, yet none has demonstrated the kind of tangible impact that was promised.
Some struggled to reach even $1 million in market capitalisation before their value collapsed, leaving people who believed in these projects with losses.
And this is where I have a serious problem.
Why have we decided to put our faith and integrity on the line for financial gain? Why are we allowing greed to take the place of our Christian values?
Do you think I don't believe in prophecy? I believe in prophecy. I value it. I operate in the prophetic, and my faith in God's ability to speak and give direction is not in question.
But believing in prophecy does not mean we should attach God's name to every token, cryptocurrency project, or financial opportunity and expect people to invest without questioning anything.
We have to separate our faith from financial manipulation.
If a #token is a cryptocurrency project, let people evaluate it as a cryptocurrency project. Let them examine its utility, team, tokenomics, transparency, roadmap, and actual progress.
Stop using the word #PROPHETIC to give people a false sense of security about an investment.
What makes this even more disappointing is that some of the people involved in this culture identify themselves as Christians. We are supposed to represent integrity, honesty, accountability, and truth. Yet we are creating an environment where people can allegedly use spiritual claims to attract investors, promote questionable projects, and potentially walk away while ordinary people bear the losses.
We cannot keep doing this to ourselves.
We talk about wanting bigger investors, institutional participation, and wider adoption in the African crypto space.
But how do we expect outsiders to take us seriously when we are struggling with transparency, accountability, and trust within our own communities?
Before we start looking for external problems, we need to address what is happening among us.
There needs to be sanity in this space.
There needs to be accountability.
There needs to be a clear separation between genuine faith and financial interests.
And above all, Christians in the crypto space need to understand that the name of GOD IS NOT A MARKETING STRATEGY.
You cannot use people's faith to sell financial promises you cannot substantiate.
We need to do better. Our faith should not become a tool for exploiting the very people who trust us.
You people should leave my prophet alone πππππ
He's a man of God πππ
πππππππππππ
Most African crypto Devs are not really serious π₯Ίπ₯Ί No structure, no direction, no funding, no influence, no connections. They can't even buy majority of their own supply π₯Ί
Omor. I quit π―π―
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
RISING GENDER WARS AND GLOBAL FERTILITY RATES
Are we creating a social environment in which men and women increasingly struggle to see each other as potential partners and collaborators in building families?
Across social media and public conversations, the tension between men and women seems increasingly difficult to ignore.
Discussions about relationships, marriage, finances, gender roles and parenting often become battles over who has it harder, who owes whom more, and which gender is to blame.
But could this growing antagonism have implications beyond dating and relationships?
Think about what it takes to build a family. Two people must meet, develop trust, establish a meaningful relationship, make commitments and, where they desire children, agree on the kind of family they want to build.
What happens when the social environment increasingly encourages men and women to view each other with suspicion rather than understanding?
Could it make people less willing to commit? Could competing expectations around finances, domestic responsibilities, parenting and gender roles make lasting partnerships more difficult to establish?
Could people who genuinely desire marriage and children find themselves struggling to meet partners with compatible values?
These are important questions in a world experiencing declining fertility rates. Gender antagonism has not been established as a major cause of global fertility decline. However, its potential influence on relationships, partnership formation and decisions about parenthood deserves closer examination.
Perhaps we should ask ourselves:
Are we creating a society where men and women are increasingly learning how to argue against each other, but finding it harder to build a life with each other?
A healthy society does not require men and women to agree on everything. But it does require an environment where mutual respect, trust, cooperation and shared responsibility can flourish.
Because building the next generation is not a competition between men and women.
It is a shared human responsibility π§‘
- Reproductive Health Observatory
Neonatal DAO
They will learn the hard way.
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
The world is having fewer children than it did a generation ago.
In the 1960s, the global Total Fertility Rate (TFR) was approximately 5 births per woman. By 2024, it had fallen to approximately 2.2 births per woman.
That's a decline of more than half within just a few decades.
But what does this actually mean?
Total Fertility Rate estimates the average number of children a woman would have over her reproductive lifetime if the age-specific birth rates of a particular year remained unchanged.
A rate of approximately 2.1 is often used as the replacement-level benchmark in populations with low mortality. Below this level, populations may eventually experience decline if low fertility persists and migration does not offset the decline.
The implications extend beyond population numbers. They include ageing populations, changing workforce structures, pressure on pension systems and questions about how societies sustain future generations.
THE BIG QUESTIONS:
π What is driving this global decline?
π Are economic pressures and evolving relationships reshaping people's decisions about marriage and parenthood?
π What role do reproductive health challenges, modern lifestyles, nutrition and delayed childbearing play?
π And what happens when generations consistently have fewer children than those before them?
The future of human generations is being shaped by decisions, circumstances and societal changes happening today.
We need to understand what is changing, why it is changing, and what it means for generations yet to come.
- Reproductive Health Observatory
Neonatal DAO
The Common Person (CP) retweeted
Replying to @very_common_guy
πΉπΉπΉπΉπΉ
Let it not be that you are using style to run away from crypto, then go and be shading us with memes.
Come back here oπΉπ
One jobless African crypto Dev cooling off after a hard day of PATIENTLY rugging community bulls πππ
















