α

INEOS so far: • Spent 2 years chasing Dan Ashworth, only to eventually sack him. • At the end of the season, they conducted an assessment and decided sacking Ten Hag was the best decision for the club. • Ten Hag wins the FA Cup, and suddenly they change their minds and keep him, only to sack him halfway through the following season anyway. • They then claimed they had conducted another thorough assessment and concluded Ruben Amorim was the best man for the job. • Amorim had made it clear from day one that he would play a back three and wouldn't change his system. INEOS agreed and backed the appointment. • Dan Ashworth reportedly disagreed with the Amorim decision and was subsequently sacked. • A few months later, INEOS sack Amorim, essentially because he wouldn't abandon the system they knew he was going to play when they hired him. • They then told fans they would use the remaining six months of the season to find the right, competent manager. • Six months passed. They did nothing and eventually appointed the interim manager they had already chosen, claiming he was the suitable candidate. • Now it's August, and that "suitable candidate" has a net spend of around £40m. They aren't even properly backing the manager they supposedly concluded was the best man for the job. Make of this what you will. #mufc