Block Reporter

I really didn’t want to make this public. But when a competing platform presents the tech as its own while its own frontend literally says “ZecBit” all over the code, I think people deserve an explanation. These screenshots are from their own website. Look closely. Their own product references: ZMD-1 zecbit-wallet-v3.js noir-zecbit-link.js window.noirZecBit zecbit:* zecbit-genesis Their own protocol page literally has a section called “ZMD-1 Resolution”. For context: ZMD-1 was created by @zec_bit We designed it, built it and published it openly because we WANT other teams to use it. But if you’re presenting yourself as a new infrastructure layer while your product is running on our standard, our naming and ZecBit-specific components, there’s a very simple question: what exactly did you build yourselves? Open source means use it. Fork it. Improve it. Build on top of it. It does not mean erase the origin and repackage the work like it appeared out of nowhere. And if their implementation contains our MIT-licensed code, the required copyright/license notice needs to stay with it. So before sending ZEC or minting through any new platform, do your own due diligence and look under the UI. A new website doesn’t automatically mean new technology. We built ZMD-1. We built the infrastructure around it. And now the receipts are sitting inside their own code. We’re not asking them to disappear. We’re asking them to explain it. Credit the work. Show the provenance. Tell users what is actually yours. Until then, the code speaks for itself. 🛡️