Pinned Tweet
Histrionic Election Analysts Soon to Face Wednesday Morning: My Final Election Prediction for 2026.
In 2022, Republicans started with 213 seats and gained 9 seats.
We called it a red trickle.
What makes 2026 different? Why would a 15 seat net gain be a blue wave?
Because of redistricting? Because there was redistricting efforts between 2021 and the 2022 election.
Replying to @DavidD_Chapman
Disagree on your view of history in the House as you can't compare elections where the minority already has 215 seats with historic gains imo. If Dems hit 230+ it is equivalent to 2018 with redistricting imo. Highly doubt they can hit 230+ though. Subject to change picks below.
This is only a net gain of 14 seats for Democrats.
This is not a wave. You can cry about redistricting but redistricting has existed longer then rock music.
A real wave overcomes partisan gerrymandering. The gerrymandering in 2008 & 2010 saved no one.
In the last 2 weeks polling in the Senate Races have shifted drastically towards Republicans.
On RCP, Texas, Maine, Alaska, and Michigan the democrat candidate's lead has fallen under 2pts.
And in Iowa, Ashley Hinson has taken the lead.
We've now reached the point where if the normal polling error happens, the Republicans will win every senate race expect North Carolina, Georgia, and New Hampshire. Also, Minnesota is questionable in this scenario.
But, the normal polling error could give Republicans 53 senators.
David D. Chapman retweeted
This is just another data point that suggests that if Trump and the Republicans can turn out these uncertain voters then there’s a huge trough of them available that could literally swing the election
My Maine Senate Prediction has always been Collins by 5pts
Maine Senate:
🔴 Collins 47%
🔵 Jackson 47%
@trafalgar_group, 1,077 LV, 10/21-23
thetrafalgargroup.org/news/m…
David D. Chapman retweeted
🚨 POLITICO: Internal polling shows Republicans narrowing the gap in the Midwest, while Democrats privately warn their gains could fall short of the party’s 2018 wave.
David D. Chapman retweeted
Texas Senate Primary RCP aggregate overestimated Talarico's lead by 3.8pts and underestimated Paxton's lead by 20.7pts.
Democrat Primary
RCP Aggregate
🟦 Talarico 52.3 (+10)
🔵 Crockett 42.3
Final result
🟦 Talarico 52.4 (+6.2)
🔵 Crockett 46.2
Miss: Talarico overestimated by 3.8pts
GOP Primary Runoff
RCP Aggregate
🟥 Paxton 49.2 (+7)
🔴 Cornyn 42.2
Final Result
🟥 Paxton 63.8 (+27.6)
🔴 Cornyn 36.2
Miss: Paxton underestimated by 20.6pts
David D. Chapman retweeted
Histrionic Election Analysts Soon to Face Wednesday Morning: My Final Election Prediction for 2026.
An under the radar Anthropic AI story.
The Elvis Presley Estate is suing Anthropic for copyright infringement.
Apparently, the AI company has been using Elvis Presley's music as part of their AI training.
rollingstone.com/music/music…
Texas Senate Primary RCP aggregate overestimated Talarico's lead by 3.8pts and underestimated Paxton's lead by 20.7pts.
Democrat Primary
RCP Aggregate
🟦 Talarico 52.3 (+10)
🔵 Crockett 42.3
Final result
🟦 Talarico 52.4 (+6.2)
🔵 Crockett 46.2
Miss: Talarico overestimated by 3.8pts
GOP Primary Runoff
RCP Aggregate
🟥 Paxton 49.2 (+7)
🔴 Cornyn 42.2
Final Result
🟥 Paxton 63.8 (+27.6)
🔴 Cornyn 36.2
Miss: Paxton underestimated by 20.6pts
I will be releasing an X article today breaking down both my Senate and House final predictions.
Stay tuned.
David D. Chapman retweeted
Low propensity, democrat voters need animating events like George Floyd, or hands up don’t shoot in order to feel motivated to vote.
The reason I’m leaning more toward the 2002 end of my spectrum:
1. The Dems had been crushing the mail vote in the elections that put them in the ballgame. The mail vote is disappointing.
2. The 4/4 hardcores came out early, and Reps have been catching up ever since, even in states that once looked iffy (NC, GA).
3. I see no evidence that post-USAID cuts, in the first environment where Dems are out-funded & outspent in over a decade, that we’re suddenly looking at a D+7-8 night. To secure that Democrats would need to turn out on Election Day, indies would need to break hard for them, young voters would have to be turning out, seniors would have to be closer to 2020 margins over 2024.
4. What I do see is a historically unpopular and broke Dem party, with an insurgent movement in the DSA and extreme, anti-American candidates hurting them and hurting their unity. This election is not a referendum on the party in the White House, it’s a series of 50 state elections at the same time. Indies are not uniformly breaking to create a wave, it’s going to depend, young voters will go Dem but we’re talking about the smallest generation in American history, not 15% of the electorate (as polling samples have used), and I have noticed that every move of the last two years has been geared toward two constituencies, seniors and parents. Seniors are ALWAYS VOTERS. And parents are the next closest thing, most just don’t have the time to be activists outside of school boards.
Add it up and I think 2026 is going to be a shocking result for a lot of people. Even those that get their desired overall result.

















