Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3) profile picture
Joined May 2011
Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)Photo by Deb Roberts (@DebRoberts3)
So @gill1109 please answer the gospel you have been spreading from Science on Trial, you always ignore anyone who questions you. Have the courage of your convictions for once. 1. Where is your proof of gestational diabetes for Baby L’s mother? #lucyletby
3
2
2
11
5,518
Letby chose not to call them because it would further damage her case. Next!
"I have no opinion on her guilt or innocence, but when you look at the fact that there was no expert witness put forward for the defence, what on earth is that about?" Dame Sue Black is disconcerted by the lack of forensic evidence in the Lucy Letby case👇 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06…
8
7
1
63
5,859
Just for those who are not blocked yet on my original account before it was hacked, are there any other words you want to put into Margot's mouth? After all women should be seen and not heard, right? #innocencefraud
Is Margot allowed a voice? Or are only superior supercillious middle aged men with a penchant for Letby who need to interpret what Margot meant allowed a voice? #innocencefraud
3
4
433
Why would you post to me and block me from replying, Carl? @GuerrillaCarl #innocencefraud
9
2
13
2,228
You'll have to remove your block on me @guerillacarl if you are genuine about wanting to chat.
3
1
5
455
Anyone who will confidently diagnose without speaking to the drs who were there, without getting input from other disciplines, and with incomplete records will raise questions of their authenticity.
It's in Dr Lee's findings, which is hilarious really. Numbers 1 & 2. The medical histories were not incomplete, he just didn't have access to them. Same for the obstetrics. 🤣
1
1
13
453
Replying to @tinysusieporter
Absolutely 💯%. I'm astounded by what I am reading in this book. Everyone has been hoodwinked. Those babies should never have been at Chester and were seriously ill before they were in Lucy's care or ANY nurses care. It is exactly as Dr Shoo Lee put it. Doctors, NOT nurses!
1
5
254
Deb Roberts retweeted
Yes it did. Twice. Peter Hitchens claims there is no evidence Letby is guilty of murder yet insists he doesn’t believe she is innocent. How strange.
1
1
3
321
Another one in the bag for @cheshirepolice from last nights @PoliceChiefs SIO awards. Investigation Team of the Year - Operation Hummingbird! 🙌 What a result for our Director @andypeelsol's old stomping ground, Cheshire. #NPCC #SIO #Police
16
4
6
8
9,643
Tesco 🤣
23
4
38
8,091
How appropriate. The loudest, most persistent voice regarding Letby & the person who has the least knowledge of the case. I would like to bet the families detest you @ClarkeMicah.
1
2
432
Replying to @ClarkeMicah
It doesn’t matter how many people regurgitate the same talking points, this is all going to fizzle out unless you can come up with something that the juries haven’t already considered.
13
2
2
26
12,045
The basis of your concern was not the New Yorker, @ClarkeMicah, you were in contact with @gill1109 in Oct, when you bought HIS false narrative. Rachel Aviv's source of disinformation was Adams, same as Gill's. You disagree with @lizhull based on what? Evidence none of you know?
.@debroberts22249. Don't be ridiculous. The basis of my concern is work done by Rachel Aviv of the New Yorker ( who has studied the entire transcript of the trial as well as making widespread inquiries among participants). I respectfully disagree with my colleague Liz Hull.
2
1
5
773
Why are the #LucyLetby stans also election deniers, Farage fans, Trump boot lickers, anti vaxxers, chem trail chasers, flat earthers, Sandy Hook deniers and Muskies? A real mystery as to why their collective IQ’s add up to under a 100.
6
1
3
658
Deb Roberts retweeted
Replying to @reasonoverfear
Just the response I expected. You & your podcast pal Elston just want to be free to spread disinformation... I showed Elston the nature of neonatal reporting & why death rate data is unreliable. He chose to ignore as he prefers the higher numbers than actual facts. Wonder why?!
1
281
Deb Roberts retweeted
Replying to @reasonoverfear
It is clear you haven't, Buddy. It is your statement so the onus of proof is on you. That, of course, is if you wish to be taken seriously... Of course there will be those who choose to believe anything you say, confirmation bias and all that.
2
270
Deb Roberts retweeted
Replying to @reasonoverfear
It is COCH not COGH which you have insisted for months on calling it. Have you not read into the case because how do you not know with all of your extremely strong opinions that it is Countess of Chester Hospital?
2
271
Whilst the NGs debate the volume of air needed to cause death and speculate on impossibilities & improbabilities, here is what an injection of air into the muscle can do. An injection into muscle can cause death, less than the 5ml they claim would not be fatal. #lucyletby
1
2
1
433
Deb Roberts retweeted
Replying to @reasonoverfear
So you will be able to provide proof of the cotton wool stuffed into a CPAP mask because it was too big?
1
1
1
536
An aside because I am bored & will pick up again tomorrow but what is with this Mills & Boon shit? Is the article supposed to be serious or is it supposed to be fiction? 1/3 of the way through approx but where is the science?
2
4
285