Sahih Muslim explicitly states the understanding that was held for centuries that the Ahlul Bayt intended in 33:33 did not include the wives.
Since when did Sunnis start to take a speakers corner charlatan over their Sahaba 🤭
The wives of Rasool Allah ﷺ are part of Ahlul Bayt.
Anyone that speaks negatively of them is an enemy of the Prophets ﷺ family.
Brother @MrAdnanRashid responded to a Shia who asked about this.
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
So your latest game, after disowning Nawawi is disowning abu Hanifa is because another hanafi came after him 😂🤣..
Okay, Here's al sarkhasi, an imam of the Hanafi school:
VERDICT: ACCEPTED
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
Yes I know Ibn hajrs verdict: he does waqf on the report itself then says it becomes Hassan with corroborating evidence.
Also here’s Abu hanifa.
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
HAHA openly state 'Nawawi is wrong and I choose to not side with him because (I cherry pick)'... So now you take the opinion of those who come later? Yala
OKAY! Here's ibn Hajr stating a mastur's hadith is acceptable because no jarh was recalled.. LMAO
and I dare you to go down the rabbit hole further. It'll all go back to what i first stated which your insecure childish self couldnt comprehend and tried to make a 'point' into a debate and ridiculed himself.
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
Now youre cherry picking
Here’s nawawi in sharh sahih Muslim
الآخران فاحتج بهما كثيرون من المحققين.
Do you want an example of nawawi verifying a mastur narration or because it doesn’t suit you that Mohammad Ibn Abi Bakr unalived Uthman you’ll jump away from your beloved nawawi
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
lol you continuously show you don’t know what you’re talking about.
It’s totally acceptable
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
Stop spamming things you don’t understand. Ibn hajar isn’t saying anything new. The discussion is whether ‘Ibn Hibban considered those in his thiqaat book as thiqa’
He literally considered those in his book thiqa and Albani is a (chronic) LIAR
islamweb.net/ar/library/cont…
Replying to @selfsubsisting @grok
Are you stupid? You liar, you tried to play a game and got caught out with your stupidity giving Ibn ma’een a new name. You brought out that chain from Tabari to try prove it’s him 😂😂😂.
Now who is it? It’s the same person whose name you tried to attribute to another person 😂😂 you tried to erase someone’s identity now you’re scrambling for ‘HUR DURR WHO IS IT’















