GenZod (@GenSkinJob) header
GenZod (@GenSkinJob) profile picture

Website owner interested in the World Wide InterWeb

New York, USA
Joined November 2023
Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)Photo by GenZod (@GenSkinJob)
Nailed it
Google obliterated their search function for this
1
6
63
5,264
Must-read if you work in SEO. New Google leak based on 14K attributes (features). Interesting stuff related to Chrome, homepage trust, page title & more. -> Secrets from the Algorithm: Google Search’s Internal Engineering Documentation Leak by @iPullRank ipullrank.com/google-algo-le…
16
108
13
419
57,322
Google seems utterly lost Search has gone from brilliant and invaluable to nearly unusable in <6 months.
31
18
237
27,515
They steal our content. They wipe out our traffic. They penalize us for having affiliate links or ads to make up for that loss of income. They tell us to ditch thin content, then later admit that GSC was underreporting clicks. They tell us expertise and experience are important signals, then bury first-hand content under crap written by freelance generalists using AI. They tell people hit by HCU that recovery is possible in a couple weeks…months…maybe next update? They impose site-wide penalties on small sites which tend to be solo sites, but page-based penalties on big publishers who’ve got the staff to fix things. They elevate big brands that have scraped content from smaller ones without adding anything new, then punish small sites with original content for optimizing so they’re found in search. And literally overnight they rip established sites with good DA and excellent traffic out of the top 3 on a wide vertical and sink that site’s traffic and income. Avoiding Creator burnout? You caused it, Google. How stupid do you think we are that you’re still trying to pretend you’re helpful to creators in any way? You’re the single biggest threat to original, heartfelt and helpful content out there.
🏗️ Starting a live show 😮‍💨 Avoiding creator burnout These are just some of the topics @SEOJoBlogs and @MichaelChidzey discuss with @okaylizzi and @JohnMu in the latest #SOTRpodcast.
47
136
28
651
96,965
Google is an absolute shitshow. Query: “How Google is killing independent sites like ours” That’s the exact title of an article that HouseFresh published 3 months ago. The very first thing Google surfaces? An “AI Overview” of a *Reddit post* discussing the article. The actual HouseFresh piece? Buried at the bottom of Page 2. Google Search is fundamentally broken.
48
76
11
429
54,406
John, any chance you can comment on the fact that many HCU-affected websites - which have been making all kinds of improvements over the last 7 months - have only seen further declines with the March Core Update? I have seen some sites lose 90% or more of their SEO visibility since the HCU, with the last few weeks being the nail in the coffin, despite making significant improvements. And in my professional opinion, many of these sites did not deserve anywhere near that level of impact, especially the further declines over the past month. – at Queens, NY
This quoted post is unavailable.
23
19
4
267
86,635
This is my main issue. Even without full recoveries - which I know first hand take a very long time - my main question is why exactly ZERO sites showed positive movement after 7 months? Not even 10%, 20%? I have the data right in front of me. Most sites fell by over 90%. – at Queens, NY
Replying to @lilyraynyc
And also would love to hear their theories that websites can recover at any time (or might take months per John), but there are no instances. Those seem like impossible odds in light of what we are being told.
19
17
2
143
25,875
Here is recap of what Google is doing to end my website. I have worked really hard for the last 20 years at this to see an algorithm update essentially end business as I know it. It's a long read with lots of charts and examples mtnweekly.com/health/google-…
65
116
36
395
103,647
If there are any independent journalists in the media left, now’s a great time to write some stories about Google and its onslaught against bloggers and small websites. For years, Google has been shifting away from its role as a search engine into a promotional platform for Google products and ads. They’ve gradually replaced bloggers and niche site owners in the search results with their own indexed content, widgets, and now Generative AI— all of which were taken from website owners without their consent. Slowly but surely, Google has encroached on the “middle man,” those of us who create valuable, long-form content in return for a small share of ad revenue. That is, until recently, when Google decided to go full speed ahead and put the final nail in the coffin for small businesses… In the recent Google algorithm updates, they’ve decided to further tilt the scale in favor of a handful of major publications, under the pretense of promoting “helpful content.” If Google were actually trying to serve users helpful content, they wouldn’t be placing four sponsored ads at the top of the search results, nor would they be giving preferential treatment to big sites with lean content and general, rehashed advice rather than firsthand experience. Not to mention the crazy amounts of spam all of us have been seeing in the SERPs. There’s a big difference between what Google says it wants versus what we are seeing in real time. And sadly, this is becoming devastating for small businesses... What is happening right now is basically the equivalent of Amazon decimating brick & mortar businesses. But unlike that issue, which has had lots of airtime, there haven’t been any legacy media companies covering this story. There ought to be at least some media coverage here, as it is negatively impacting millions of people. Right now, the majority of news about Google is overwhelmingly positive. Most of what I’m seeing is favorable articles about new Google features and products. How about an article where we call a spade a spade: Google is too large and powerful, and it needs to be reigned in. A monopoly like Google, left unchecked, will dominate the online ecosystem to the maximum extent possible. It will do so at the expense of any and all other stakeholders that stand in the way of Google maximizing its profits. This includes legacy media and major corporations; they won’t be in Google’s good graces forever… This is a much bigger issue than just the livelihood of small businesses: Google is attempting to dominate the conversation and shut out any and all voices who aren’t “paying to play” in the Google ecosystem. They are stifling fair and equal competition, which hurts EVERYONE in the long run, including the reader/consumer- who will only be served the most mainstream, general & unhelpful content. In a time when mistrust of the corporate media is at an all-time high, we need journalists to step forward and assert their independence from the big corporate megaliths. We don’t want a biased hit piece against Google (or its people) either; we simply want someone to come in and cover the facts of what’s actually happening. That way, we can spread awareness to save small businesses. And so I ask journalists: are you going to speak out and show your independence from big corporate powers like Google? Or will you ignore what’s happening and reinforce the idea that media companies are owned and controlled by big business (after all- who owns the Washington Post?) Whatever happened to holding truth to power? If that is still a core value of media publications, now is a good time to do some investigative journalism. We need you and the world needs you.
24
28
6
125
14,518
Another topic I've seen thrown around post HCU is that publishers should not create content "for Google." That we should not be trying to "speak to Google." That we should "ignore Google." I want to forget about Google. Except, I can't. I wanted to run my business as a faceless brand, prioritizing the message of "Homemade Hooplah" being the go-to place for fun party foods over building a Martha Stewart-type personal brand. Except, I can't, because Google has made up a metric that says unless I plaster my face and real name all over my site and make extensive use of "I" and "my" then my site is clearly not trustworthy. (Quick side note - it's pretty wild that in 2024 I have to pick between my online privacy and my site's success.) I wanted my content catalouge to cover unique items as well as staples people already know. I wanted my site to be browsable for hours, letting users discover new ideas along with tried-and-true favorites. Except, I can't, because Google no longer wants to rank me for common recipes (or they'll just generate the whole ingredients+instructions with SGE), and having an abundance of low-ranking content can hurt my site overall. Which is really unfortunate, because no one is searching for my unique content - because, you know, it's unique, most readers haven't heard of it yet - and I needed to get people in the door with more commonly known content to have any hope of them seeing the unique stuff. I wanted my unique content to have a better chance of being found in search, so I tried to optimize it for more obscure (but still totally relevant) terms or ideas that people might actually be looking for. Except, I can't, because optimizing for keywords and user intent in any way is just plain bad now, I guess? I wanted to keep my good (yet common) content online so that maybe other search engines will show it to their users. I also wanted to share this content with my 3+ million social media followers who have grown to trust me over the past 10 years. Except, I can't, because I'm now supposed to deindex or even DELETE content that Google has deemed unworthy to rank or risk my whole site being dragged down. So now, if someone lost my post on social and tried to search for it by the name or image, it can no longer be found. This list could go on and on and on. Online publishers WANT to forget about Google. But it's hard to do that when a company has reached gatekeeper status and can negatively impact the livelihoods of millions of people based on decisions they made between games of Foosball. I'm unable to forget about Google until they stop overcomplicating the means in which I keep the lights on in my house. @searchliaison @JohnMu
14
8
4
111
8,106
Reddit outranking the @ThisHouseFresh article for “How Google is killing independent sites like ours” is probably the most “so sad it’s funny” example of how bad they are that I’ve seen yet.
25
58
14
388
49,115
Google: We found Unhelpful Content on your website, so we're demoting your entire domain in search results Me: Wait, what?! Google: Don't worry, if you simply remove the unhelpful pages, you can recover Me: Great! So you'll tell me what pages I need to remove? Google: LOL, no
37
47
15
444
47,696