Joined March 2024
General Stark retweeted
Replying to @CynicalPublius
The Left in this country today is an extended Manson Family of corrupt Robespierre wannabes without the intellect or charisma, and will keep trying to overturn the will of the voters by ANY means including targeted kinetic ones, while shouting about "Love" and yelling "Democracy"
128
2,032
81
9,642
199,393
General Stark retweeted
Why does xenophobia have such a negative connotation? It’s perfectly normal to not want the culture of Afghanistan or Somalia in my country. It’s logical, even.
98
682
4
8,324
54,731
October 7th is the day I stopped caring about the Palestinians. The earth could up and swallow them and I would completely indifferent. They are as close to being collectively evil as it’s possible for an entire people to be.
They just watched their daughter and sister be murdered.
21
276
14
2,309
32,007
On this we agree. Social Security, in its short lifespan, structured as a Ponzi scheme, is immoral. It confiscates the wealth of one generation to hand to the next, without the consent of those it was taken from, and with no account, no asset, and no contract behind the promise. Each retiree's check depends on the next worker being forced to pay in. Charles Ponzi went to prison for less. But Walsh stops at the wrong place. He objects that the recipients are richer than the payers. That's the Left's framing with the generations swapped. If retirees were poorer than the young, would the taking be fine? The moral problem is the taking. A man's earnings are his property, and seizing them by force to fund someone else's retirement is wrong no matter who ends up ahead. Who has the higher net worth belongs to the redistribution playbook, not to a defense of rights. That matters because the premise under Social Security is that your income belongs to society, to be distributed by need. Every conservative who accepts that premise and then complains about the arithmetic is arguing about the size of the theft. Trump promised never to touch entitlements. Reagan raised the payroll tax to save it. The Right has defended this system for ninety years because it shares the premise. The fix follows from the principle. Stop forcing new workers in, honor what's owed to people who were forced to pay as fully as the books allow, and let every individual own his own retirement as property no Congress can vote away. A man forced to pay into a system is entitled to collect from it. He isn't entitled to force the next man in behind him.
I understand that the social security conversation is political poison. But I’m not running for office so I don’t care about that. Taking huge chunks out of the paychecks of young working Americans in order to pay for the retirements of older Americans who have a net worth several times higher, all to prop up a system that everyone knows likely won’t be there when those younger people are retirement age themselves, is morally abhorrent and economically insane. Everyone knows it, too, but we’re held hostage by elderly politicians who refuse to surrender power, and older voters who, as a group (with exceptions, obviously), simply don’t care all that much about the financial and cultural future their grandchildren will inherit.
86
50
11
295
10,780
General Stark retweeted
The idea that Christ was brutally crucified, died in one of the most humiliating ways imaginable, and simply stayed dead, yet His disciples somehow became galvanized, fearless, and willing to risk everything to preach His message across the known world… that is an absolutely wild take.
56
72
5
998
21,580
General Stark retweeted
Since USAID was dismantled, the left has not won a single election in Latin America, by the way.
526
3,738
753
22,241
2,955,213
General Stark retweeted
Here is a man who won one of the first great American victories of the Revolution without fighting a battle. He was not a soldier. He was a fat, cheerful Boston bookseller with no military training, and what he pulled off in the winter of 1775 into 1776 is one of the most staggering feats of sheer willpower and logistics in American history. His name was Henry Knox. Knox learned war the way he learned everything: from books. He ran a fashionable bookshop in Boston, and he devoured the military engineering and artillery treatises on his own shelves. When the Revolution broke out, that self-taught knowledge suddenly mattered, because the American army besieging British-held Boston had a fatal problem. They had the enemy penned in the city, but they had almost no heavy cannon to force them out. It was a stalemate, and stalemates favored the British. Knox had an audacious idea. Nearly 300 miles away, at Fort Ticonderoga in upstate New York, sat a treasure of captured British artillery, dozens of heavy cannon and mortars taken earlier in the war. What if someone went and got them? Brought the guns to Boston? Everyone could see the problem: it was winter, the route ran through frozen lakes, rivers, forests, and the snowbound Berkshire mountains, and the guns weighed a combined 60 tons. Sixty tons. It sounded impossible. Washington gave the 25-year-old bookseller the job anyway. And Knox did it. He got to Ticonderoga and set to work dismantling and hauling out around 59 pieces of artillery, some of them massive. He had 40 heavy sledges specially built. He rounded up teams of oxen, dozens and dozens of them, and boats to move the guns across the water before the freeze. And then, through the brutal heart of a New England winter, he dragged 120,000 pounds of iron and brass across a frozen wilderness. Picture it. Cannon lashed to sleds, oxen straining in the snow, men breaking through ice, hauling the guns up and then carefully down the icy slopes of the Berkshires, where a runaway sled could be a disaster. Guns broke through frozen rivers and had to be fished out. It was backbreaking, dangerous, freezing work, mile after mile, week after week. And this untested bookseller held it all together by force of personality and organization. In under two months, he brought the entire "noble train of artillery" 300 miles through the dead of winter, and in late January 1776 he reported to Washington that the guns had arrived. Then came the payoff. On a single night in early March, Washington's men quietly hauled Knox's cannon up onto Dorchester Heights, the high ground overlooking Boston and its harbor. When the British woke up, they found the American army suddenly looking down their throats with heavy artillery that could smash their ships and their positions. Their commander realized the city was untenable. And so, rather than fight, the British evacuated Boston entirely on March 17, 1776, and sailed away. The Americans had liberated a major city without a battle, because a bookseller had done the impossible with oxen and sleds and nerve. Knox never looked back. He became Washington's chief of artillery for the rest of the war, the man whose guns crossed the Delaware to Trenton and pounded the British into surrender at Yorktown, and after the war he became the young nation's first Secretary of War. Fort Knox is named for him. But his greatest monument is that winter journey. Remember Henry Knox, the bookseller who read about artillery in his shop, then went out and dragged 60 tons of it across a frozen wilderness to hand George Washington the guns that freed Boston.
85
871
62
3,885
93,831
Aura. Christ is King.
61
670
33
14,650
402,050
General Stark retweeted
You are in the middle of an intensive, carefully orchestrated information warfare campaign designed to make you believe that the midterms are already lost and that there is no hope. This only works if you choose to let it work. Don't let it work. Fight the power.
1,227
8,870
478
28,559
328,266
Whether you're Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox, I consider you my Brother In Christ. We are more alike than we are different. All of us need to stand united against the godless communist scum.
55
112
7
897
27,636
General Stark retweeted
They don't say stuff like this because they believe it. They say it because they hate Christ and wear Christianity as a skin suit.
Episcopal priestess says Mary assigned Jesus male at birth, but he was trans. And when he was resurrected, he came back as His true, transgender self.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Before his birth, during his life, & after Jesus rose, he was always referred to as a male. Gabriel tells Mary she will bear a son & to name him Jesus (Luke 1:31–32). Woman, behold your son (John 19:26) He said to them… as he was teaching… (John 20). catholic.com/magazine/onlin…
81
573
7
9,260
103,932
Man gas is really expensive, I better vote for the party that flooded our country with tens of millions of illegals, funded the creation of COVID-19 that killed tens of millions, turned the intel agencies on private citizens, mutilated & indoctrinated our children at scale, stole an election, illegally spied on the opposition party/candidate, sabotaged an administration, framed a duly elected president, ignited a color revolution, bankrolled Hamas protests on college campuses and universities, censored Americans, jailed supporters, staged a fedsurrection, locked hands with islamists, and installed a non compos mentis dementia patient as leader of the free world.
1,331
6,574
510
21,514
470,657
General Stark retweeted
“Being an American is something much deeper, much more deeply ingrained in us as people. And probably the fact that we can’t really define it is because it’s so deeply ingrained. It’s like asking a fish to explain what water is. It’s everything around us.” - John Doyle
7
182
4
1,915
94,642
General Stark retweeted
I feel that the 25th anniversary of 9/11 has caused a critical mass of Americans to reach an inflection point on their understanding of that event. We are starting to realize that we lost the Global War on Terror. We did not lose it on military grounds. We lost it on spiritual grounds. Domestically we are succumbing to the goals of Sharia and jihad, which was EXACTLY what the 9/11 terrorists sought to bring about with their heinous actions. Now that more and more people are seeing this, we can combat it--not with tanks and bombs and rifles alone, but with our words, voices and votes. We must actively combat the Islamification of America. Sharia and jihad are wholly incompatible with the Constitution. Islam is a political movement hiding beneath the cover of freedom of religion. When a "religion" itself is not free, it is no longer a religion and no longer enjoys the protections the Constitution affords. Spread the word.
837
7,030
333
23,891
286,557
General Stark retweeted
Thomas Aquinas on the nature of Islam from the beginning: “The point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms [weapons]—which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning. Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms. Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly.” —Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles I.6
Islam did this. Never forget.
150
2,472
142
10,091
430,580
General Stark retweeted
George W. Bush is one of the worst Presidents in American history. It's time to stop pretending that he "met the moment" after 9/11. Yes, he gave a moving speech at Ground Zero and threw a great first pitch at Yankee Stadium. But instead of going after the people responsible for the attacks, he decided to use the political capital he gained to launch failed nation building projects in the Middle East, massively expand the power of the surveillance state, and throw open our borders to the very ideology that attacked our nation.
619
1,687
152
10,128
434,811
General Stark retweeted
Islam did this. Not radical Islam. There’s no such thing. There is only one Islam and this is it. People who tell you Islam is peace are either misinformed or lying. The 1400 year history of Islam proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that Islam is rape, pedophilia, torture, enslavement, murder, genocide and colonization. Muslims aren’t oppressed, they’re the most vicious oppressors in world history.
994
3,805
238
10,837
408,873
General Stark retweeted
There is no political Islam; no moderate Islam; no Islamism; no extremist militant Islamism; no Jihadism; no Wahhabism; no self-radicalized Islamism; no radical Islam; no radical Islamism. There is only Islam. Countless Islamic leaders and scholars have said so. Only Westerners come up with euphemisms to protect Islam as though the latter fictitious terms are something distinct from Islam.
431
4,893
249
17,682
331,377
General Stark retweeted
⚡️This is the bill arriving for the AI revolution. If that ~$100B Louisiana figure is even broadly right, the important signal is the order of magnitude: single AI infrastructure complexes are entering the same capital class as civilization-scale megaprojects. That changes the frame completely. A $100B build means AI demand is no longer asking for more servers. It is pulling forward power generation, transmission, substations, cooling, networking, industrial equipment, construction capacity, land, gas supply, and probably eventually nuclear around one computational node. That is what a new general-purpose technology looks like when it starts acquiring a body. The chart itself is a little promotional because it mixes different things. The Interstate Highway System was a national program over decades, while this appears to be an announced private investment over roughly ten years. Announced cost also does not equal completed cost. But forget the ranking. The scale is the signal. Private capital is now contemplating individual AI installations whose budgets belong in conversations with dams, tunnels, airports and national infrastructure systems. That means the economic bet behind AI has become extraordinary. Nobody rationally commits tens of billions to power-hungry infrastructure because they expect today’s chatbot economics to remain the endpoint. The capital is underwriting a future where machine intelligence becomes embedded across huge portions of economic activity and therefore consumes staggering quantities of computation. And this is where the earlier 15 GW power-shortfall post connects directly. The industry is effectively saying: We can finance the intelligence. We can manufacture the chips. Now rebuild the physical world quickly enough to feed them. That is the emerging constraint. The deeper market signal is that AI capex is becoming infrastructure capex, and infrastructure capex spreads much farther through an economy than software spending ever did. You start with accelerators. Then electricity. Then turbines. Then copper. Then transformers. Then cooling. Then gas. Then nuclear. Then factories producing all of those things. Eventually entire regions get reorganized around compute availability. That is why Louisiana matters. Cheap energy, industrial land, existing gas infrastructure, permitting, transmission potential, and huge physical footprints suddenly become strategic AI assets. The places capable of delivering gigawatts become the new digital geography. And here is the part worth burning into the model: The AI boom is starting to look less like the internet buildout and more like electrification. Electrification did not merely create electric companies. It reorganized factories, cities, transportation, household life, manufacturing and productivity around a new universal input. AI can do something similar with cognition. But cognition at this scale requires an enormous physical machine underneath it. That machine is now being built. The first phase made Nvidia enormous. The next phase makes the world underneath Nvidia enormous.
It’s going to be big
15
13
2
123
24,872
General Stark retweeted
A society that justifies a woman murdering her child in the womb for any reason will inevitably justify murdering her child outside of the womb for any reason
This isn’t a slippery slope. It’s an absolute moral free fall.
82
792
10
5,815
64,663