Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie) header
Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie) profile picture

Exploring Web3 and the World of DATA. A Realist | Content Creator | Community Moderator

Joined May 2026
Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)Photo by Wuyi🕴️ (@IsaiahdTechie)
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
Binance Hack. What happened, and how did it happen? Feel free to watch the video.
44
291
25
1,175
100,059
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
i like North Korea. Whenever they need money for any internal development, they just find one World organisation to Hack😂😂 that money will then go into the creation of gMore missiles, more Nukes, more infrastructure development for the people of NK. Crypto bros should be happy that they have funded and contributed to North Koreas defence against any form of Imperialism🫡.
11
46
4
453
15,308
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
Neden hep Kuzey Kore? Anlatayım. Kuzey Kore, dışa kapalı bir ülke ve gelişebilmek için kaynak bulmak zorunda. Üstelik bu kaynak sadece para değil; bilgi, araştırma ve veri de olabiliyor. Milyarlarca dolarlık Ar-Ge yatırımları yapmak yerine, bu yatırımları yapanlardan bilgi çalmak daha cazip geliyor. Devlet, yıllarca siber kapasitesini artırmak için yatırımlar yaptı ve bu alanda oldukça fazla insan yetiştirdi. Son iki yıldır kripto piyasasındaki hack olaylarında Kuzey Kore'nin çok büyük bir payı var. Çalınan varlıkların toplam değeri açısından bu oran %50'yi aşıyor. Kuzey Kore, 1990'lı yıllardan beri siber kapasitesine yatırım yapıyor. Birinci Körfez Savaşı sonrasında siber yeteneklerini geliştirmeye ağırlık verdi. Çünkü dışa kapalı bir ülke için siber dünya oldukça avantajlı bir alan. Kripto piyasası ortaya çıkmadan önce de Bangladesh Bank soygunu ve WannaCry fidye yazılımı saldırısı başta olmak üzere çok sayıda siber saldırıyla ilişkilendirildiler. Bunların arasında finansal kazanç amacıyla gerçekleştirilen saldırılar da vardı. Kuzey Kore'nin sadece bir hacker grubu yok, kurumsallaşmış bir siber istihbarat sistemi var. Dünyada çok yetenekli bağımsız hackerlar bulunuyor. Ancak Kuzey Kore'nin en önemli avantajı, siber operasyonlarının bir bölümünü doğrudan devletin istihbarat ve güvenlik yapısı içerisinde yürütmesi. Lazarus, Bluenoroff ve Andariel gibi devlet destekli hacker grupları, faaliyetlerinin ciddi bir cezayla sonuçlanmayacağını düşünerek operasyonlarını sürdürüyor. Eski bir siber güvenlikçi olarak şu ayrımın çok önemli olduğunu düşünüyorum: Bağımsız bir hackerın yakalanma korkusuyla saldırı düzenlemesiyle, ceza almayacağını, hatta başarılı olduğunda ödüllendirileceğini bilen bir grubun saldırı düzenlemesi aynı şey değil. Zamanında bir hacker forumunda birkaç Kuzey Koreli hackerla sohbet etme fırsatım olmuştu. Bu hackerlar milyarlarca dolar çalıyor olabilir ama konuştuğum kişilerin anlattıklarına göre motivasyonları doğrudan para değildi. Kadınlara erişim, alkol ve dışa kapalı bir ülkede kendilerini daha özgür hissedebilmek gibi ayrıcalıklardan söz ediyorlardı. Çünkü milyarlarca dolar çalsalar bile aslında maaşlı birer çalışanlar. Bu hacker forumlarında, uzaktan çalışan olarak yerleştikleri şirketlere ait erişimleri de satıyorlardı. Dark web üzerinde ciddi bir pazarları vardı. Şirketlere sızmak için kullandıkları yöntemlerden biri de sıradan bir IT çalışanı gibi uzaktan iş başvuruları yapmak. Birçok şirkete bu yöntemle Kuzey Kore bağlantılı çalışanların yerleştiği, Google'ın güvenlik araştırmalarında da belirtiliyor. Bu yöntemle hem uzaktan çalışarak maaş geliri elde ediyorlar hem de bazı durumlarda şirketlerin iç sistemlerine erişim sağlıyorlar. Bu erişimler daha sonra veri hırsızlığı, fidye yazılımı saldırıları veya farklı siber operasyonlar için kullanılabiliyor. Ancak bir başka önemli nokta daha var. Kuzey Kore zaman zaman günah keçisi de ilan edilebiliyor. Gerçekte onların gerçekleştirmediği saldırıları Kuzey Kore'ye yüklemek isteyen başka aktörler de olabilir. Örneğin Çin'in de devlet destekli hacker grupları var. Ancak Çin'in siber operasyonlarında ekonomik kazançtan ziyade stratejik bilgi ve teknoloji hırsızlığı daha fazla öne çıkıyor. F-35 savaş uçağına ilişkin teknik bilgilerin çalınması iddiaları bunun en bilinen örneklerinden biri. Bunun gibi pek çok stratejik Ar-Ge çalışması ve teknolojik araştırma da devlet destekli siber operasyonların hedefi oldu. özetle Büyük kripto saldırılarının arkasında sıklıkla Kuzey Kore'nin çıkması tesadüf değil. Çünkü onlar için siber saldırılar bireysel bir suç faaliyetinden çok, devletin ekonomik ve stratejik hedeflerine hizmet eden kurumsallaşmış bir sistem. Ancak her büyük saldırının arkasında Kuzey Kore olduğunu düşünmek de doğru değil. Bazen gerçekten saldırıyı onlar gerçekleştiriyor, bazen de başkalarının işlediği suçlar onların üzerine yıkılabiliyor.
JUST IN: 🇰🇵 North Korea responsible for $6 billion Binance hack, CNN reports.
21
70
5
1,082
183,640
AN OPEN LETTER TO MY FELLOW AFRICAN BUILDERS: Did you notice something when the Binance hack happened? Tether (USDT) stepped in to freeze assets. Circle (USDC) followed. Ripple, World Liberty Financial, Paxos, and other blockchain players joined the response. All from America and Asia. Africa literally had nothing to contribute apart from crying and hoping our funds are safe. Now, here's my point: For generations, Africa has been known for consumption. We own the resources, but we don't own the platforms that turn those resources into global economic power. Nigeria dominates global stablecoin ownership, yet there is no globally recognized stablecoin from Africa or Nigeria. We have millions of crypto users, yet no globally dominant African exchanges, financial infrastructure companies, and blockchain protocols. We participate in the global economy, but how much of it do we actually own? Look at the world around you. American and Asian companies dominate major parts of technology, social media, and finance. Their influence comes not just from the resources they possess, but from the systems they build, the markets they control, and the value they create. That is what economic power looks like. So, the next time you ask why global platforms aren't looking in our direction, ask yourself: What are we building that the world cannot afford to ignore? The world partners with value. It invests in solutions. It respects those who build indispensable systems. To every African developer, founder, and innovator, let's return to the drawing board. Let's stop competing only for attention and start building products that command global attention. We have the talent. We have the market. We have the opportunity. Now, we must build the infrastructure, own the platforms, and change the narrative. Africa doesn't have to remain the world's consumer. We can become the people who build what the world consumes. Let's keep building.
51
71
13
356
13,425
I see a lot of posts saying, "Elon Musk is richer than CZ. Even if Binance sells its $SPCX shares, it won't affect Elon." Sorry, you don't understand how this game works.😂 Let me tell you something: CZ may even have more liquidity than Elon. Elon's wealth is heavily tied to company equity and other market-sensitive assets like $BTC, $ETH, and $DOGE. When the value of those assets drops, his net worth can fall dramatically. That's why whenever SpaceX's value drops, Elon's net worth drops drastically. But here's what people are missing: CZ's real power isn't just his money. It's his influence over the crypto industry and global finance. One major move from a figure with that kind of influence can shake market confidence. Just one move and your Bitcoin will go below $50k tonight.😂 That's the kind of influence we're talking about. Those who own the platforms make the decisions. Don't be emotional. If CZ/Binance publicly questions SpaceX and spreads FUD, the reaction will extend far beyond his own portfolio. Everyone under CZ's influence will sell their bags. Billionaires don't just look at how much money you have. They look at your influence, your network, and your ability to affect the value of what they own. At the highest level, wealth is more than capital. It's leverage. It's a game you must understand if you want to survive at the top.
235
61
18
835
159,480
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
CEX getting hacked DEX getting hacked DeFi getting hacked Hot wallets getting hacked Cold wallets getting hacked Genuine question... where should we keep our money safe?
317
22
16
402
36,945
Issokay. Stay SAFU
The platform users use to track hackers just got hacked. You cant make this shit up man.
1
2
22
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
giveaway 🤖 win 5 $ROBUTS tokens (about $50 at today’s value): tesla 34%, alphabet 33%, amazon 33%, in one token to enter: 1. follow @koturoxyz 2. follow @KyleCast_ 3. repost this 1 winner, drawn at random. ends mon 11/2, 3:30pm ET
87
126
1
142
4,129
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
What a year to be alive 😂😂🤝
30
4
78
1,808
It will be crazy od coinbase really gets hacked from 2026 is goon go down in history. I honestly thought Bybit $1b hack of last year was the peak. Binance decided to show us who's the boss. This is just an open letter and reminder to all exchanges to go reinforce their security measures/procedures coz binance to be is the definition of safe. But guess what ?? 😀
Binance was reportedly hit by a major security breach, putting crypto security back in the spotlight. The attack affected multiple blockchains. Binance says it will cover all losses, while billions in assets have reportedly been frozen. Now, here's an interesting question: Will Coinbase get hacked before the end of 2026? That market is already live on @xomarket , created by Kekov @0xkekov . That's what makes XO interesting. It's a permissionless prediction market where anyone can create a market on any topic. Would you pick YES or NO?
1
1
24
Wait oo Just remembered coinbase had an issue too last year 😕 Omorh
7
The later phase of this 30 days series will be on Crypto hacks. - How the hacks possibly happened - How the funds are laundered - The biggest perpetuators (hackers) - How much in total has been lost - How CEXs manages those looses More to come 😀 🫴
Web3 × Data — Day 24/30 October 29 was a rough day for crypto. Binance, Polymarket and zkLink Nova all reported security incidents. Here's what happened: Binance: Blockchain investigators tracked approximately $6.36B in assets moving from Binance-controlled wallets. The suspected attack involved compromised employee access and internal systems. Binance said around $3B in affected assets had been frozen and pledged to cover losses. Polymarket: A compromised third-party service reportedly exposed users to malicious code, resulting in approximately $2.7M in losses across hundreds of wallets. zkLink Nova: An attacker exploited a vulnerability in its cross-chain bridge verification system, reportedly taking around $783K. Then came the CZ–Elon exchange. Elon joked about the Binance incident, prompting CZ to ask him to stop trolling at a difficult time. CZ also referenced Binance's $500M investment in Twitter, now X. What does this mean for crypto? Security breaches can weaken investor confidence, increase selling pressure and trigger liquidations in leveraged markets. They also raise questions about exchange security, third-party services and cross-chain infrastructure. The data matters: Different attacks, different vulnerabilities, but one recurring lesson: understanding crypto requires looking beyond token prices. We need to examine wallet movements, transaction patterns, fund flows and security failures to understand what is actually happening. Less hype. More data. 📊
13
Web3 × Data — Day 24/30 October 29 was a rough day for crypto. Binance, Polymarket and zkLink Nova all reported security incidents. Here's what happened: Binance: Blockchain investigators tracked approximately $6.36B in assets moving from Binance-controlled wallets. The suspected attack involved compromised employee access and internal systems. Binance said around $3B in affected assets had been frozen and pledged to cover losses. Polymarket: A compromised third-party service reportedly exposed users to malicious code, resulting in approximately $2.7M in losses across hundreds of wallets. zkLink Nova: An attacker exploited a vulnerability in its cross-chain bridge verification system, reportedly taking around $783K. Then came the CZ–Elon exchange. Elon joked about the Binance incident, prompting CZ to ask him to stop trolling at a difficult time. CZ also referenced Binance's $500M investment in Twitter, now X. What does this mean for crypto? Security breaches can weaken investor confidence, increase selling pressure and trigger liquidations in leveraged markets. They also raise questions about exchange security, third-party services and cross-chain infrastructure. The data matters: Different attacks, different vulnerabilities, but one recurring lesson: understanding crypto requires looking beyond token prices. We need to examine wallet movements, transaction patterns, fund flows and security failures to understand what is actually happening. Less hype. More data. 📊
1
1
1
30
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
De*d😂
JUST IN: Elon Musk says super intelligence AI agents will eventually hack financial systems to obtain money for themselves, not humans.
3
1
21
2,823
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
I find it funny when people complain about laziness without considering how much of the global economy exists because human beings are fundamentally unwilling to tolerate inconvenience. Someone got tired of washing clothes by hand, and we got washing machines. Someone got tired of buying CDs and DVDs, and we got streaming platforms. Someone got tired of walking long distances, and transportation became an entire industry. Someone got tired of visiting stores, and we got e-commerce. Someone got tired of typing everything, and now we have AI assistants. But here's the part I find most fascinating: every invention creates a new standard of laziness. We invented washing machines, and now transferring clothes into the dryer feels stressful. We invented streaming, and now choosing what to watch feels exhausting. We invented online shopping, and now manually repeating an order feels unnecessary. The inconvenience that one generation celebrates eliminating becomes the inconvenience the next generation refuses to tolerate. Perhaps laziness isn't always the opposite of productivity. Sometimes, it's the dissatisfaction that makes productivity possible. The real question is: what are we currently too lazy to do that will become a billion-dollar industry tomorrow?
9
10
50
3,147
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
🚨$200 SOL GIVEAWAY🚨 5 Winners • $40 ($SOL) Like, Retweet and Follow @Open_Gap and type solana:Fvto3QgSLbcWdq331BoR66RDkT7dZYgTS9JzbntMf7rD in comments with Sol on Sol Address Winner picked in 24 hours. Good luck. ❤️
20
28
1
33
958
GM to all takers Both old and new 🌝 Have a nice day and TGIF 💥 from WUYI
24
Wuyi🕴️ retweeted
The Binance hacker might have just pulled off one of the smartest moves I’ve seen in crypto. First, Tether froze $1.5 billion in USDT. Then Circle froze another $800 million in USDC. At that point, it looked like the hacker’s money was trapped. But apparently, he had already planned for that. Instead of holding the stolen USDT in a wallet, he allegedly deposited it into Aave and used it as collateral to borrow ETH. Then he walked away. That’s where the story gets crazy. Tether can freeze the USDT sitting in the wallet. But it can’t freeze the ETH he already borrowed. So now Aave is left holding frozen collateral, while the hacker is sitting on liquid ETH. And unless the protocol can recover it somehow, he may not even need to pay the loan back. Two companies froze billions of dollars in seconds. But someone who understood how to use DeFi may have found a way around both of them. Pretty insane when you think about it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The frozen $1.5B+ USDT and $800M+ USDC were held in the attacker's main wallet (shown in the post's image), not Aave. Only ~$60M USDT from a related wallet was deposited into Aave pre-freeze to borrow ~$45M ETH. governance.aave.com/t/binance-hot-… decrypt.co/382191/binance… coinstats.app/news/1f0734d0f…
353
677
186
5,372
852,428
something very fishy is happening in crypto right now. elon musk just quote tweeted crypto twice. once to pump it. once to bury it. 12pm: NYSE's owner partners with hyperliquid's biggest builder to bring perps to the US 1pm: billionaire stan druckenmiller makes his first tweet ever. it's about hyperliquid. 4pm: elon quotes him. "interesting" HYPE +20%. knocking on ATH. then 7pm: polymarket gets drained 9pm: binance gets drained up to $5.9B gone. biggest hack in history if confirmed. almost 4x bybit. withdrawals paused. $1.4B liquidated. BTC under $79k. monero +6%. 11pm: elon quotes it. "everyday is zeroday" 7 hours between the two. and just like that, nobody's talking about hyperliquid anymore. binance's biggest competitor, gone from the timeline. all 19 days after the 10/10 anniversary, when $19B got liquidated in a single day. coincidence?
11
2
41
2,411
Who is getting hacked next? So I can know where to move my last $15
179
66
237
2,253