Not only is $XRP a gas token, but also the preferred source of liquidity for the native DEX's pathfinding algorithm. This makes it an ideal bridge asset for the long tail of currency pairs. #XRPL #internetofvalue
Replying to @Ivory_Python @TheEconomist
The same kind of poorly informed people that say "bye" and then block you. Incapable of having a conversation and somehow believes they're informed. 🙄
Replying to @TheEconomist
Sad to see. I guess they found enough poorly informed Americans to pull it off. Or they stuffed the ballot boxes. 🤷♂️
Replying to @ElectionCenter_
Sad day for Mass. Deaton would have done them right.
Replying to @ElectionTime_
Sad day for Mass. Deaton would have done them right.
Replying to @Politics_Polls @DecisionDeskHQ
Sad day for Mass. Deaton would have done them right.
Replying to @cryptodotnews
Let me guess, Bill Hinman gets a job too? 🤮
Replying to @Toyota
When a person pays $60,000 for a car, the last thing they want to see is a paid subscription just to use the features they already paid for. What a slap in the face! 🖕
Replying to @MarioNawfal
How long before they start using this on their own citizens? Government could do anything they wanted to me, knowing if I dare open my mouth, all they have to do is deploy a drone.
IvoryPython retweeted
The more I hear this bullshit the more angry I become. They act like not passing Clarity somehow stopped Trump from making money. Trump made money in Crypto because there was no Clarity.
I hope I make it to the Senate just so I can look each one of these 🤡 🤡 in the face and call them the liars that they are - and yes this includes Republicans in the Senate as well.
Replying to @RealLindellTV @SenThomTillis
Farmers don't need banks if they too "chase better yields."
Replying to @cowboycrypto313
These are the people making decisions for the nation? 🤮
Replying to @RibbekasRambo @BankXRP
More likely the house and senate will play ping pong with it for another year before it sees the president's desk.
Replying to @AbsGEC @CarlHigbie
If the Senate passes it, it still has to go back to the house who is probably going to make changes, which means it will then have to go back to the Senate who is probably going to make changes... again, which means it will go back to the house... again. Maybe next year? 🤷♂️
Replying to @Ivory_Python @DigPerspectives
House still has to approve the senates changes. If house makes a change, it has to go back to senate.
Replying to @DigPerspectives
Just the senate, or senate, house and signed into law?










