Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin) profile picture

“Everything popular is wrong." - Oscar Wilde

Brooklyn, NY
Joined June 2016
Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)Photo by Max Shifrin (@MaxShifrin)
Max Shifrin retweeted
100% of children want ice cream for dinner
66% want Medicare for All 61% want a billionaire wealth tax 57% want a $20/hour minimum wage 63% want a data center moratorium 58% want to end military aid to Israel 73% want to ban super PACs 79% want a 10% credit card interest rate cap No more excuses. Democrats must deliver.
471
2,020
62
42,389
624,729
Max Shifrin retweeted
It’s Orwellian being a secular Jew right now. You have a lot of liberal friends, but you no longer fit the camp. So you watch from afar as they celebrate the blue wave, convinced they just crushed tyranny and saved America. And you’re thinking, shit… what they’re actually cheering is the election of a Senator and several Congresspeople whose agenda is to sever American ties with the only Jewish state, and whose ideology is the same socialism our grandparents fled a century ago. All from a party now vowing to “stop AI,”handing China the lead in the technology that will decide the next century.
710
527
76
4,465
195,944
Max Shifrin retweeted
Guys. Why are we pretending that Rubio wasn't talking about this at the beginning of March??
Wow. Senator John Kennedy. How is this not everywhere. Seriously. This is insane. Listen to what he’s actually saying.
116
740
30
4,905
214,325
Why they NEED it to be a genocide. From a live event at Valley Beth Shalom Synagogue, Encino, California. With Rabbi Nolan Lebovitz and Reverend Drew Sams, Senior Pastor of Bel Air Church.
107
856
123
2,631
206,364
Max Shifrin retweeted
I spoke to @FoxNews about this Abdul El-Sayed exchange with Sarah Haines on The View. foxnews.com/media/view-cohos…
The View’s Sara Haines holds Abdul El-Sayed’s feet to the fire over his “hurt people, hurt people” comments after a Muslim terrorist attacked the Temple Israel synagogue in West Bloomfield last year. She challenged him TWICE after he tried to wriggle out of it. Good for Haines. No one else on that panel was willing to bring this up. HAINES: “Your response that ‘hurt people, hurt people’ after the Temple Israel attack in Michigan in March really stuck with a lot of people and you did apologize for that but it took you a while to…it took you about five months to seemingly understand why that landed wrong with voters and constituents…” EL-SAYED: “I was trying to argue about…or offer context around the fact that that individual had lost a child, niece and nephew in an air strike…” “I want us...to be have an adult conversation about the ways in which actions ricochet around the world and create worse for all of us.” That’s when Haines clapped back again. HAINES: “I just think that if that had been done anywhere near what I believed, I would be so furiously enraged that they would use the words that I have led my life with to hurt people that way and that was young kids, so I just was surprised it took a minute for you to understand that part.” So in other words, El-Sayed apologized because of the optics, but not because he disagrees with his original sentiment that people should empathize with radical Islamic terrorists.
12
24
2
196
28,299
Max Shifrin retweeted
Your guide to the next political cycle. DSA Left: "All our problems are caused by Israel and its Jewish supporters." Online Right: "No, no, no. All our problems are caused by Jews and the Israel they support."
210
311
36
1,757
95,173
Max Shifrin retweeted
Last night is exactly why no President has dealt with Iran before now We don't reward Presidents for acting in the best long-term interest of the country We reward them for avoiding difficult decisions if it means we don't have to make any sacrifices during any given 2yr period
1,476
5,389
475
35,595
1,173,485
Max Shifrin retweeted
Mr. Vice-President, Please allow me to present a different perspective. The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire. If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it – otherwise don’t start it. This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism. Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or won’t we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency. In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue. No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision. Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didn’t last, didn’t work and left us in no man’s land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed. Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon. No, Mr. Vice President. It’s not the war. It’s the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
8,978
14,525
2,224
67,033
6,211,519
Max Shifrin retweeted
What a weasel this guy is He has no problem throwing Trump under the bus, but won’t say a single bad thing about Tucker
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
164
333
13
3,506
32,545
Max Shifrin retweeted
1) The war in Iran was going great until you guys convinced the president to stop. 2) MAGA has nothing to stand on when it comes to affordability; you were pushing tariffs from the jump. 3) If voters wanted America First, why did they vote for Democrats over MAGA candidates?
The conservatives who said: 1) The war in Iran is catastrophically stupid 2) Affordability is a real problem 3) America First Were exactly right on every point.
50
156
6
1,154
25,743
A lot of people are totally oblivious to what this movement is ultimately about. Israel, and America’s alliance with it, is simply one of the most effective targets if your goal is to undermine the West and remake the geopolitical landscape. That alliance makes America enormously powerful, and America’s adversaries know it. They’ve poured enormous resources into undermining it, including by spreading propaganda designed to turn Americans, particularly young Americans, against Israel and the alliance itself. And they’ve had considerable success. This doesn’t end if we cut aid to Israel or diminish AIPAC. The hostility toward Israel is, in significant part, rooted in a much broader anti-American, anti-Western ideology. Israel is simply the most convenient target, not the ultimate objective.
Jewish Democrats are hopeful today that with U.S. funding to Israel ending and AIPAC politically diminished and no longer funding candidates, the hatred will stop. Here in Canada we have no AIPAC equivalent, and our funding to Israel is insignificant. The hatred is worse.
26
5
45
9,514
Max Shifrin retweeted
A fantastic analysis.
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more. Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go. Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all. So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man. Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure. On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular! What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it. Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population. The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world. Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline. Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side. That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
30
36
1
610
139,669
Congratulations to the Democratic Party on successfully consolidating the Piker-Fuentes voting block.
Get out and vote Democrat today 🌊🗳️
27
1
16
6,773
There's something about the anti-Zionist movement that's uniquely hostile to not just its opponents, but to discourse itself. No meaningful engagement with the substance of arguments. Just vitriol, ad hominems, and emotional manipulation. That's not how you persuade people. That's how you bully people into submission. This wolf comes as a wolf.
23
2
1
11
6,273
Max Shifrin retweeted
@grok factcheck this
1
1
2,059
.@DavidAFrench has some tough love to share on @MSNOWNews re: #MISEN👇 "This is someone who is not a tent-expanding choice by the Democrats; I'm sorry, he just wasn't." "When you go with someone who is not the American mainstream, ideologically, as much as other people, you are risking the size of your tent. I'm sorry, but that's just what is happening." "Democratic Primary voters did something different in Michigan than they did in most other states, and that's why some of these traditional red states are in play." "That did not happen in Michigan. They went with the most left-wing candidates in the Democratic Party." "Hurt people hurt people, which is a remarkable thing to say about someone who was trying to massacre children."
11
46
5
247
35,515
A lot of people are pretending there’s nothing unusual, controversial, or downright concerning about Abdul el-Sayed’s positions. Not his mother’s affiliations or some college op-ed, but his own words, on the campaign trail, that a lifelong Democrat could reasonably consider disqualifying, even in a race against a Republican.
151
12
20
154
169,897
I’m not American, I don’t live in Michigan, and I have no stake in the midterm elections. I’m not rooting for anyone. But as someone who knows the geopolitics of the Middle East and has been writing about peace for the past 20 years, I have to point out the manipulation here. What Abdul El-Sayed is doing here in this clip is creating a framework in which any territorial compromise becomes impossible. There is no way to achieve a lasting political solution between two peoples, both indigenous to the land, without substantial and painful compromises on both sides, including territorial partition. This kind of rhetoric only lays the groundwork for more bloodshed and endless war. I understand that it has become politically fashionable, a way to win votes in American elections. But it is bad news for Palestinians and Israelis alike.
318
354
50
2,385
386,889
Max Shifrin retweeted
If Israel was “bombing Gaza indiscriminately”, why did those indiscriminate bombs kill under 2% of women, 6% of men, but “discriminate” against 100% of these generals? Could it be the IDF was, in fact, as discriminating as it’s possible to be in an urban warzone? Generalocide.
These are Sinwar’s generals—Mohammed Deif, Marwan Issa, Ahmed al-Ghandour, Ghazi Abu Tama’a, Mohammed Odeh, Izz al-Din al-Haddad, Ayman Nofal, Rafa Salama, Raed Saad, Mohammed Shabaneh, Hakem al-Issa, Bassem Issa, Raed Thabet and Mohammed Sinwar—laughing as they planned their war to destroy Israel. Israel killed them all, and all their allies, up to Nasrallah and Khamenei. They failed totally.
105
691
23
3,531
79,560
Max Shifrin retweeted
Wild that during an indiscriminate bombing campaign, the IDF accidentally managed to take out all of Hamas’s leadership. Are these the unluckiest dudes ever or what?
By the way, each and every one on this picture is dead and confirmed dead by IDF and Hamas Named as they sit from lower left side through the center and then down to the lower right side: 1. Ayman Nofal – 17 October 2023 (airstrike in Bureij refugee camp; confirmed by Hamas and IDF) 2. Izz al-Din al-Haddad – 15 May 2026 (airstrike in Gaza City; confirmed by IDF and Hamas sources) 3. Mohammed Odeh – 26 May 2026 (airstrike in Gaza City: confirmed by IDF and Hamas sources) 4. Ghazi Abu Tama’a – 10 March 2024 (airstrike in Nuseirat with Marwan Issa; confirmed by IDF; Hamas confirmed later) 5. Ahmed Ghandour – 26 November 2023 (announced by Hamas during early fighting; IDF confirmed) 6. Marwan Issa – 10 March 2024 (airstrike in Nuseirat; confirmed by IDF on 26 March 2024 and later by Hamas) 7. Mohammed Deif – 13 July 2024 (airstrike in al-Mawasi, Khan Yunis; IDF confirmed 1 August 2024; Hamas confirmed 30 January 2025) 8. Raad Saad – 13 December 2025 (airstrike in Gaza City; confirmed by IDF and later by Hamas) 9. Mohammed Shabana – 13 May 2025 (airstrike under Gaza European Hospital in Khan Yunis with Mohammed Sinwar; confirmed by IDF/Shin Bet and later by Hamas) 10. Hakam al-Issa (Hakham Muhammad Issa al-Issa) – 28 June 2025 (airstrike in Sabra, Gaza City; confirmed by IDF/Shin Bet) 11. Bassem Issa – 12 May 2021 (killed during Operation Guardian of the Walls / Sword of Jerusalem) 12. Raed Thabet – 28 March 2024 (killed by IDF forces during Shifa Hospital operation; Hamas confirmed 30 January 2025; some sources cite ~18 March) 13. Mohammed Sinwar – 13 May 2025 (airstrike under Gaza European Hospital in Khan Yunis; confirmed by IDF and later by Hamas) 14. Rafa Salama (front/center, facing Deif) – 13 July 2024 (same al-Mawasi airstrike as Deif; confirmed by IDF the next day and later by Hamas)
39
293
6
2,620
40,240