Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo) header
Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo) profile picture

I am a poor, wayfaring stranger. my friends call me Chongo, pronounced with an Umpty. If loving Ukraine is wrong, I don’t want to be right.

Falls Church, VA
Joined May 2017
Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)Photo by Ulysses H. O'Chongo (@P12Chongo)
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
Elbridge Colby is also a little bitch-ass who is scared of NAFO. Pass it on.
Elbridge Colby is a problem
9
15
4
72
1,019
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
A couple days ago, I posted jobs numbers from the past 6 presidents, 3 Republican (Bush I, Bush II, and Trump) and 3 Democratic (Clinton, Obama, and Biden). Over 20 years, nearly 50 million jobs were added under the 3 Democratic presidents, whereas only 2 million have been added under the aforementioned Republicans, over the course of 17 years, 8 months. A good percentage of MAGA responders said something along the lines of, "The Democrat Party only added government jobs! Look at the private sector!" Very well. First, let's look at public sector or government jobs. George H.W. Bush (R, 4 years): +1.127M Bill Clinton (D, 8 years): +1.934M George W. Bush (R, 8 years): +1.744M Barack Obama (D, 8 years): -263k Donald Trump I (R, 4 years): -575k Joe Biden (D, 4 years): +1.816M Donald Trump II (R, 1 year, 8 months): -230k Democratic Presidents (20 years): +3.487M Republican Presidents (17 years, 8 months): +2.066M Difference: Democrats +1.421M/Republicans -1.421M Not much difference. Now let's move onto the private sector. George H.W. Bush (R, 4 years): +1.502M Bill Clinton (D, 8 years): +20.979M George W. Bush (R, 8 years): -368k Barack Obama (D, 8 years): +11.812M Donald Trump I (R, 4 years): -2.19M Joe Biden (D, 4 years): +13.589M Donald Trump II (R, 1 year, 8 months): +1.006M Democratic Presidents (20 years): +46.380M Republican Presidents (17 years, 8 months): -50k Difference: Democrats +46.430M/Republicans -46.430M That's right, over the past 37 years, 8 months, Republican presidents are actually underwater, as far as private-sector jobs go, whereas Democrats are 46 million+ above it. No matter what the GOP tries to sell you on the old, tired narrative that they're better for the economy, the numbers tell a completely different story. #VoteBlue2026 #VoteBlue26 data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutpu… fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U…
73
612
45
1,291
27,205
CONCLUSION 🧵(1/2): Putin would have the world, and especially the United States, believe that he is somehow holding back from crushing Ukraine, but that he could do so at any moment of his choosing. The opposite is the case. If Putin had had a way of ending the war quickly, he surely would have used it. The effort to field an army large enough to make virtually no gains is costing Putin a fortune, driving up inflation in Russia, and generating increasing social discontent. Fielding a larger army would cost more with no guarantee of materially changing the situation on the front. That is why Putin is holding back at least for now. ⬇️ Putin has likely recognized the folly of trying to drown Ukraine in Russian blood and has instead opted to try to hammer Ukraine into submission with a strategic bombing campaign. The Russians have secured a temporary advantage in the skies over Ukraine through their jet-powered drones and the shortage of Patriot missiles that can intercept their ballistic missiles. But Ukraine is fielding solutions to defend against the jet-powered drones, and it is hardening and decentralizing its infrastructure to survive the ballistic missile strikes (as well as developing its own ballistic missile interceptors, although that effort will take time). The Russian strikes are currently devastating Ukrainian energy and other infrastructure and imposing a brutal cost on Ukrainian civilians—as Putin intends. But there is no reason to think that this strategic bombing campaign will be any more successful than every other strategic bombing campaign in history—all of which have failed to compel a country holding its own on the battlefield to surrender.
It is unclear whether Putin is lying about Russian gains or being lied to by his own military—or both. Russian military correspondents constantly complain of what they call “beautiful reports” that Russian military units send to higher headquarters, claiming gains they have not made. Ukrainian forces say that they have been able to use the Russian military’s own internal culture of lying to their advantage, luring Russian troops into traps because the Russians think that they are moving through territory they control. Leaked Russian military maps show phantom gains, often matching Putin’s claims. The pervasive lying within the Russian military is a problem for Russian soldiers, but likely an advantage for Putin, as it supports his own efforts to present Russian forces as advancing and winning when, in fact, they are doing neither.
24
542
30
1,552
78,325
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
Indeed.
Much easier for the media to lock in on faux Cheesecake Factory outrage than a House Dem report indicating Todd Blanche basically told Ghislaine Maxwell "stop talking" when she was about to discuss a girl that could more closely tie Trump to Epstein
53
2,526
25
8,732
200,636
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
“On Feb. 5, 2025, her first day in office, Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force, dismantled the department’s unit pursuing Russian oligarchs’ assets, and narrowed enforcement of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. CISA paused its election security work, abandoned the information sharing center that connected it to state and local election officials, and by mid-2025 had lost more than a third of its workforce. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard gutted the Foreign Malign Influence Center, the State Department closed its office for countering foreign disinformation, and National Security Council working groups on Russian sabotage and disinformation stopped meeting. The next target was the people. In August 2025, Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former officials, among them a senior Russia analyst who helped produce the 2017 assessment, citing the “politicization or weaponization of intelligence.” Comey was indicted on Sept. 25, 2025, over his 2020 Senate testimony, five days after Trump publicly demanded his prosecution. A judge dismissed the case, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is currently hearing the department’s appeal. CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred former Director Brennan for prosecution for alleged perjury in his congressional testimony, and Brennan has been subpoenaed to appear at a Florida grand jury examining whether officials who investigated Trump conspired against him. The purge also reached below the senior level, and analysts who worked on the 2017 assessment also had their clearances stripped. The FBI forced out a veteran counterintelligence agent over his ties to an official in the original Russia investigation, and dozens of FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors were fired or demoted for work investigating Trump or Russia.”
69
1,396
97
2,487
65,686
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
Musk pokračuje v informační ofenzívě proti Ukrajině tvrzením, že Ukrajinci využívají Starlink k úderům útočným dronovým operacím. Musk přitom znovu lže, protože zkrátka víme, že terminály Starlinku se používají stacionárně a na mobilních cílech je limit stanoven na něco mezi 70 - 90 km/h, což je pro ukrajinské middle-strike drony prakticky nevyužitelné. Pojem middle-strike je přitom důležity, protože se vztahuje na údery do hloubky maximálně 160 km. Jak víme, nad Ruskem Starlink/Starshield nefunguje, byť o to Ukrajinci evidentně žádali. To v praxi znamená, že Ukrajinci útočí na ruské jednotky na okupovaných územích, což je naprosto exemplární příklad využití práva na sebeobranu (ostatně i útoky na vojenské cíle na ruském území jsou příklad sebeobrany). Nicméně, vzhledem k tomu, že víme, že Starlink je pro middle-strike údery nepoužitelný, bavíme se samozřejmě o omezení terminálů, které používají přístup skrze Starshield. Musk samozřejmě o tom rozdílu musí moc dobře vědět, přesto se drží vylhané linie o nějakém ukrajinské porušení podmínek. Ukrajina je čistě fyzicky porušit nemůže. Další a další rány nejen do důvěry mezi USA a Ukrajinou, ale také mezi USA a Evropou a nejhorší na tom je, že to za sebe americká vláda nechává dělat nikým nevoleného bilionáře, který ani nedisponuje mandátem, kterým by vztahy mohl ovlivňovat. Americká administrativa musí zakročit a hodně rychle, každý další den bude zhoršovat vztahy mezi blízkými spojenci.
57
222
7
1,091
23,397
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
Buď teda Ukrajinci dokázali nějak hacknout systémy SpaceX a používat civilní antény Starlink za pohybu, nebo je Musk lže. Takže: 1. Rusové od loňského roku načerno nakupovali Starlinky všude možně po světě, ty pak nasazovali na Ukrajině. 2. Problém začal řešit tehdejší ministr obrany Fedorov a jeho tým. Řešením byly bílé seznamy (whitelists), kdy pouze oficiálně registrované terminály mohly být zprovozněny nad území Ukrajiny (kontrolované Ukrajinu nebo okupované Ruskem). 3. Povolené civilní terminály fungují pouze ve stacionárním režimu nebo za velmi nízké rychlosti pohybu (do 90 km/h). 4. Registrovat terminály museli jak vojáci (přes Delta nebo Armija+), firmy a státní zaměstnanci přes portál Dia, civilisté a podnikatelé přes CNAP. Registrovalo se KIT číslo, UTID a číslo účtu. 5. Registrace byla spuštěna 5. února 2026. A teď to podstatné (a zopakuji to znovu) Ukrajinští vojáci pro terminály, které se využívají na mobilní cíle ve vysoké rychlosti (typické middle strike drony při zrychlení z rampy nebo třeba drony interceptory), používají službu Starshield. To je služba, o které Musk říká, že ji kontroluje americká vláda (a všimněte si, že už nepíše, že ji vlastní). Jde o využití stejné konstelace satelitů Starlink, ale s lepším šifrováním, přístupy a tak dále. Zde je důležité, že za tuto službu neplatí americká vláda, ale vláda německá skrze FMS (Foreign Military Sales, což je proces, přes který Amerika prodává své zbraně, například Patrioty). Ta platí tuto službu do půlky května příštího roku. Co se omezila, je služba Starshield, tj. terminální na mobilních cílech. Nejde tu teď momentálně o stacionární Starlink, který funguje právě na principech těch bílých seznamů. Proto se Němci ozvali. Proto se Ukrajinci ozvali. Proto si Musk, Rubio, Trump a další přehazují zodpovědnost a matou společnost. Důvodem není jen to, že v rámci americké společnosti nechtějí ztratit zbytky kreditu, ale taky to, že se vysílá vzkaz spojencům, kterým říkají, že pokud na postu amerického prezidenta bude člověk, který chce lízat ruskou/čínskou/severokorejskou či jakoukoli jinou podrážku, může mechanismus FMS s odůvodněním "národního zájmu" podělat. A tenhle signál je mnohem horší, protože se Evropané (a vlastně kdokoli, kdo se u Američanů rozhodne nakupovat přes FMS, nebo jiný mechanismus, přes který není možné domáhat se právní ochrany u soudu/arbitráže) budou naprosto legitimně ptát, co všechno v sobě obsahuje kill switch a jak moc jsme schopní nahrazovat americké know how tím svým? Proto Musk bulí, když Evropané mluví o předělovaní frekvencí pouze pro evropské společnosti. Proto američtí technologičtí giganti jsou nervózní. A proto budou mít problém i americké zbrojovky, které mají díky válce v Evropě žně (nákupy z Evropy jsou největší za desítky let a po 20 letech jsme největšími odběrateli amerických zbraní). Trump si neuvědomuje, jak velký geopolitický průšvih za sebou zanechá, pro nějakou zdánlivou výhodu, kterou mu momentálně Putin nabízí. Ať už to 300 000 tun nafty, stavba infrastruktury ruskými společnosti pro Aljašku, nebo nějaké shady kontakty, který má Witkoff a Kushner s Dmitrijevem.
157
1,390
102
6,083
424,327
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
If Zelensky is so corrupt, why did we buy Donald and not him?
True, insightful, and brilliant—Elon exposes the self-perpetuating evil cycle of war profiteering.
21
668
7
5,287
49,502
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
There is something deeply wrong with a political system that allows one trillionaire to buy his own personal U.S. Senator.
There is something deeply wrong with Talarico
10,074
26,170
985
223,038
5,814,184
No, @elonmusk, the U.S. stopped funding Ukraine last year. In fact, U.S. companies make money on American weapons for which we Europeans pay. The more you meddle in our politics and the more you play politics with your products, the more you damage your brand.
Replying to @elonmusk
And some of that US taxpayer money comes back through multiple laundry machines to fund political campaigns in America, which is why you see some politicians caring more about Ukraine than America!
1,320
9,607
352
50,479
1,000,245
Once again, I am personally convinced that the only right way to deal with this administration is a firm, confident, calm, and utterly non-negotiable “no.” And to calmly, methodically call things by their names in public. We call betrayal betrayal, lies lies, and truth truth. Let him rage and spew whatever vile, lying curses and threats he wants, foaming at the mouth if he likes. If he thinks it will be easier to bully Ukraine into committing suicide for the sake of his own absurd whims of the moment and his itchy little hands, he is deeply mistaken. All that sickening groveling, crawling on our knees, and kissing his ass only makes him climb onto our heads, try to solve his problems at our expense, and go on pleasing his idol in the Kremlin. Ukraine has the extraordinary heroism of its soldiers, Europe, basic common sense, and American public opinion on its side. And has no cards in his deranged attempt to collude with the Kremlin.
90
812
27
4,918
89,672
There were reports on efforts to deal with the aftermath of Russian attacks on our cities and communities. Overnight, Russia used, among other weapons, three ballistic missiles with cluster warheads against Kyiv. These missiles are designed to detonate in the air as they approach their targets, spreading damage across an area 400 meters in diameter. One of them struck Pechersk, Kyiv's historic center, hitting the area between the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra and the Holy Presentation Monastery. Monastery buildings, homes, shops, cafés, and other civilian infrastructure were damaged. This is another extraordinarily revealing strike – revealing because it was no accident. The choice of weapon was deliberate, the choice of target area was deliberate, and so was the intent to inflict as much loss and damage on civilians as possible. There was no military target nearby, not even in theory, and the weapon was designed to cause widespread destruction. Russia has not changed the way it wages this war, and it is taking no steps that would signal a genuine desire to end it. Throughout the day, air raid alerts have continued in Kyiv and many other cities. So have the strikes. In Kharkiv, a regular commuter train was hit. Dnipro, Marhanets, Mykolaiv, and Kherson, as well as cities and villages in the Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Donetsk, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, and Rivne regions, came under attack. Russia keeps targeting our energy infrastructure. Since October 11, there have been more than 170 strikes on critical energy facilities, even though we are shooting down a significant number of “shaheds” and some of the missiles. I thank all our friends around the world who are helping us restore our energy system. Our intelligence services report that Russia has set priorities for further terror against Ukrainians in the coming weeks. Russia is clearly taking advantage of the slowdown in air defense supplies from our partners. It is equally clear that when some partners ease the pressure on Russia, it only reinforces Putin's belief that his goals are within reach. We need different signals and different steps – stronger ones. I have instructed the Ministry of Defense, together with the military command and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to brief our partners on every aspect of the real situation and the threats we face, based on intelligence data. It is important to speed up deliveries of defense packages that have already been approved. I thank all the leaders and countries that are helping!
536
2,592
125
9,898
282,264
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
🇵🇱 Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk is not holding back: “The time has come to say it out loud. Donald Trump is responsible for fuel prices”.
❗️“The time has come to say it out loud. Donald is responsible for fuel prices,” – Polish Prime Minister Tusk openly accused Trump in the Sejm of the global fuel crisis.
115
3,148
34
12,112
76,204
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
A couple points here: (1) Ukrainians were killed because of this illegal action, and Musk should be sued personally in U.S. federal court; (2) this was illegal, as stated, in violation of existing agreements to provide such services; (3) nationalize SpaceX/Starlink NOW; (4) Musk has the blood of children on his filthy hands, there must be severe accountability.
41
366
13
1,166
12,299
Another Russian ballistic missile attack came in several waves overnight, and once again, there was no early warning from our partners. They again targeted energy facilities and infrastructure, but a medical clinic, a school, a metro station, and ordinary residential buildings were also damaged. In total, the Russians launched 16 ballistic missiles in a deliberate attack on Kyiv and the Kyiv region. The Russians also launched more than 200 drones of various types, including jet-powered “shaheds,” with attacks spanning from the Kharkiv and Dnipro regions to the Volyn, Rivne, and Odesa regions. Sadly, there are casualties. My condolences to their families and loved ones. Those who were injured are receiving assistance. Overnight and this morning, Russia attacked energy facilities in the Vinnytsia, Volyn, Kirovohrad, Kyiv, Mykolaiv, Zhytomyr, Khmelnytskyi, Kharkiv, Ternopil, Odesa, and Rivne regions. In this one night alone, more than 10 energy infrastructure facilities were damaged, and the lights went out for at least 550,000 families. Repair crews are working at the sites. Ukraine never wanted this war, and we have welcomed literally EVERY attempt by our partners to bring this war to a dignified end. We have responded positively to EVERY ceasefire proposal. Russia's response, time and again, has been ballistic missiles, “shaheds,” and killings. Putin not only doesn't want to end this war – he doesn't even want to take any steps toward de-escalation. EVERY ONE of our partners has experienced this firsthand when they heard Russia's refusals. And it is crucial to call things what they are. To call the aggressor an aggressor and help Ukraine defend lives. When deliveries of missiles for Ukraine's air defense are blocked while Russia is granted relief or delays in sanctions, this is, unfortunately, a denial of reality on the part of our partners. The reality is that the war continues, and it continues solely because of Russian strikes and Russia's desire to drag this war out. I thank everyone who recognizes this reality and helps Ukraine!
1,848
6,862
424
22,844
865,560
Translation: The President shows he’s being duped by Putin and doesn’t know who is at fault in this war. He denies what other members of his own Administration are saying about Russian aid to Iran. This will go down as a very embarrassing chapter in U.S. history. truthsocial.com/@realDonaldT…
805
1,526
109
9,223
286,238
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski: "Since January of last year, the U.S. has not contributed a single cent to the defense of Ukraine. We are doing it, Europe."
214
2,434
118
7,975
412,716
Ulysses H. O'Chongo retweeted
Factcheck of Trump’s (Putin’s???) lies about Ukraine.
125
1,790
105
4,178
136,559
We don’t use Starlink for our responses inside Russia. We use Starlink to intercept jet-powered “shaheds” that attack our civilians and kill families. Starlink wasn’t turned off – its speed was reduced. And when the speed was reduced, we were unable to intercept a certain number of jet-powered “shaheds.” We couldn’t use a tool that helps protect people. That’s very painful and frustrating. We also use Starlink for mid-range strikes against enemy military targets in our temporarily occupied territories. We couldn’t do that when the restrictions were in place. And third, what matters most is people. Our warriors, who spend weeks and months on the front line, receive food and water delivered by drones using Starlink. Has the speed been fully restored to what it was before? No. Is it being restored now? Yes. From a conversation with media representatives in Brussels. (2/3)
3,327
17,379
814
95,478
3,666,253