Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit) header
Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit) profile picture

The Bisqwit.Free software author.YouTuber.Founder of @TASVideos.ROM hacker.C++, Hebraic Roots & #IsraeliFolkDance teacher. @Persut /FinnsParty member. 🇫🇮🇮🇱.

Finland
Joined July 2013
Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)Photo by Joel Yliluoma (@RealBisqwit)
I feel like setting the record straight concerning the Russian invasion of Ukraine and a few related topics, particularly Nazis. What follows is a long text. Because it is such a common misconception, I should remind that NATO “expanded” (Finland and Sweden joining NATO) as a response to Russia's attack on Ukraine on 24 February 2022, not the other way around. Until that day, majority of Finland opposed the idea of joining NATO (unofficial polls on the subject were conducted several times in year since 1998). But in 25 February 2022, when Russia's official message changed from “we appreciate Finland’s neutrality” to “Finland may not join NATO, or else”, that's when the President Niinistö felt that Finland's sovereignty is being threatened, and the balance in public opinion quickly changed, to that we need to join NATO immediately in case Russia wants to invade our country next (again). In Sweden, the public opinion had already begun to shift in NATO-favorable direction after Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014, but it took until 2022 for the balance to change permanently, and the political decisions in the matter were made following Finland’s lead. Even if the NATO claim was true, Russia has no business conducting invasions in not-Russia. That is nothing but pure imperialism and expansionism. Even if the claims about Nazis in Ukraine were true, it’s none of Russia’s business. Russia, not-Russia. Russia, not-Russia. Russia, not-Russia. Learn the difference. (And don’t deflect by talking about USA.) Yes, during WW2 Finland allied with Nazi Germany for a moment. There were not many good options; we most certainly did not agree with Nazi ideals. In August 1939, Nazi Germany and USSR made a temporary pact that secretly stipulated that Finland, Latvia, Estonia, and parts of Poland and Romania, are to be considered USSR’s sphere of influence and that USSR may invade these lands and build military bases in them without Germany retaliating, and in exchange USSR would not impede Germany’s efforts elsewhere. In October 1939, in line with this pact, USSR officials tried to negotiate with Finland about mutual exchange of several territories, but these negotiations were fruitless. As a consequence, in November 1939, USSR attacked Finland, without a declaration of war, in a false-flag operation following an intense wave of anti-Finland propaganda to make the Russian people complacent with the upcoming invasion of Finland. In 1940, during the Interim Peace, Germany sought alliance with Finland for an offensive against USSR. Finland accepted strategic/tactical cooperation in exchange for receiving weapons and other supplies such as food. This was partially because at the time, Germany had conquered Denmark and Norway, and we were trapped: nobody else could help us recover from the Winter War. However, Finland refused to allow German usage of our land for military operations unless it happens that USSR attacks Finland again. On 22 June 1941, Germany attacked USSR. On the same day, Hitler also announced in his speech Germany’s alliance with Finland. USSR promptly attacked Finland the same day. For three days, Finland did not respond, in an attempt to remain neutral in the war between Germany and USSR. On 25 June, USSR launched aerial strikes against several cities in Finland. In response, the prime minister of Finland declared that our country is again in war against USSR, and the rest of our alliance with Germany was materialized de facto. The war lasted for three years. Had Finland not allied with Germany, Finland likely would have been destroyed for at least 50 years, probably forever. And this is the outcome that dictator Putin is now seeking in Ukraine, too. I must also point out that had the whole Nazi Germany not happened, dictator Stalin would have likely invaded and destroyed most of the continental Europe, including all its civilization, freedom, democracy, value of life, right to own private property, way of life, and tens of millions of lives. Today, I feel NATO has a similar restraining role. I do not mean that Nazi Germany should have won or that they were good-intentioned or that they never invaded any country. Quite the contrary. They even attacked us in 1944 (Lapland war) in retaliation of being forced to withdraw from Finland and as an expression of their disappointment at our neutrality, and destroyed many of our northern cities and towns as they did. Just, that sometimes, it can be useful to have the enemy’s enemy on your side. Many medical treatments are toxic to you, but because they are even more toxic to the ailments afflicting your body, they are still useful. But unlike Germany whose last concentration camps were liberated in 1945 and is no longer doing those, Russia kept doing gulags until 1950s, and is once again doing them (“filtration camps”). If you need to find fascism/nazis somewhere, look no further: Russia’s where it is. And today, we see Russia using the exact same methods that they used in WW2 times. Attacking sovereign nations, negotiating spheres of influence agreements with other military powers, spreading propaganda to sell the idea that it’s a good idea to attack a country. The Soviet Union may have disbanded, but Russia does not change.
1
1
25
3,580
Shahriq Khan kirjoittaa: "Kun olin muslimi, en koskaan huomannut, mitä Koraanista puuttuu. Nimittäin Koraanista puuttuvat tarkat päivämäärät, tarkat paikat ja tarkat virkanimitykset ja nimet, joita voisi tarkistaa. Kun luet Koraanin tarinoita, niissä ei ole lainkaan kronologiaa, tuskin ollenkaan maantietoa, kuninkaita kutsutaan vain ”faraoiksi” ja tapahtumat leijuvat ilman tarkkaa vuosilukua. Kaikki on uskomattoman epämääräistä. Et saa vastauksia kysymyksiin kuten: Missä tarina tapahtui? Milloin? Kenen hallinnon aikana? Teksti ei kerro sitä. Et voi tarkistaa sitä, mikä tarkoittaa kätevästi, että et voi tarkistaa sitä. Vertaa nyt sitä Raamattuun, lue Luukkaan evankeliumin 3. luvun alku: ”Keisari Tiberiuksen viidentenätoista hallitusvuotena, siihen aikaan kun Pontius Pilatus oli Juudean maaherrana, kun neljännesruhtinaina hallitsivat Galileassa Herodes, Itureassa ja Trakoniitiksen maassa hänen veljensä Filippos ja Abilenessa Lysanias ja kun ylipappeina olivat Hannas ja Kaifas ...” SEITSEMÄN historiallista kiintopistettä yhdessä lauseessa. Keisari, maaherra, kolme hallitsijaa tarkkoine alueineen, kaksi ylipappia. Ja ihmiset OVAT tarkistaneet nämä tosiasiat – vuosisatojen ajan, usein yrittäen kumota ne. Skeptikot pilkkasivat Luukkaan mainitsemaa ”Abileneen Lysaniasta” virheenä… KUNNES löytyi kirjoitus, jossa Lysanias mainittiin Abileneen tetrarkkina. Jotkut pitivät Pilatusta legendana… kunnes Pilatuksen kivi kaivettiin esiin Kesareassa vuonna 1961, ja siihen oli kaiverrettu hänen nimensä ja arvonimensä. Luuk. 1:3–4 kertoo syyn: ”Olen ottanut alusta asti kaikesta tarkan selon… jotta tietäisit, kuinka luotettavaa sinulle annettu opetus on.” Luotettavuus. Sitä Raamattu tarjoaa. Koraani leijuu historian yläpuolella, missä sen historiallista luotettavuutta ei voi todentaa. Raamattu pystytti lippunsa todennettavalle maaperälle ja sanoi: kaiva ja tutki. Minä kaivoin. Raamattu on osoittautunut luotettavaksi. Ylistäkää Herraa ja Hänen mahtavaa, Jumalan henkeyttämää pyhää kirjoitustaan."
When I was Muslim, I never noticed what the Quran DOESN'T have. Namely, exact dates, exact places or exact titles or names you can check. Bro, when you read the Quran’s stories there is literally zero chronology, almost no geography, kings called only “Pharaoh,” events floating in no particular year. It is incredibly vague. You cannot get answers to questions like: Where did the story happen? When? Under whom? The text doesn’t say. You can’t check it, which conveniently means you can’t check it. Now, contrast that to the Bible, read the opening of Luke 3: “In the FIFTEENTH YEAR of the reign of TIBERIUS CAESAR — PONTIUS PILATE being governor of JUDEA, HEROD being tetrarch of GALILEE, his brother PHILIP tetrarch of ITUREA and TRACHONITIS, and LYSANIAS tetrarch of ABILENE, during the high priesthood of ANNAS and CAIAPHAS…” SEVEN historical anchors in one sentence. An emperor, a governor, three rulers with their exact territories, two high priests. And people HAVE checked — for centuries, often trying to break it. Skeptics mocked Luke’s “Lysanias of Abilene” as an error… UNTIL an inscription naming Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene turned up. Pilate was called legend by some… until the Pilate Stone was dug up at Caesarea in 1961 with his name and title carved in it. Luke 1:3-4 tells you why: “Having followed all things closely… that you may have CERTAINTY.” Certainty. That’s the offer of the Bible. The Quran floats above history where nothing can touch it. The Bible planted its flag in checkable ground and said: dig. I dug. It’s still standing. Praise the Lord and His mighty God-Breathed scripture.
13
68
5
422
9,347
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Tämänpäiväiseen @Sukkola kolumniin viitaten (linkki kommenteissa): Uskonnonvapaus suojaa yksilön yksityistä uskoa ja palvontaa. Se ei ole tarkoitettu antamaan poliittisille ideologioille tai yhteiskuntajärjestelmille erityissuojaa kritiikiltä tai demokraattisilta laeilta. Jos näin tehdään, ollaan vaarallisilla vesillä. Islam ei ole pelkkä henkilökohtainen hengellisyys. Sen omissa lähteissä ja perinteessä se on kokonaisvaltainen elämäntapa, joka sisältää lain (sharia), sosiaalisen järjestyksen ja näkemyksen yhteisön hallinnasta. Muhammad toimi sekä uskonnollisena että poliittisena johtajana, ja kalifaatit toteuttivat islamilaista lakia valtiona. Moni muslimiajattelija ja -liike korostaa yhä, että islam on sekä uskonto että valtio. Tämä tekee eron “uskontoon” ja “poliittiseen ideologiaan” vaikeammaksi kuin monilla muilla uskonnoilla. Kun poliittiset vaatimukset (sharia-säännökset, sukupuolierottelu, jumalanpilkkakielto, rinnakkaisjärjestelmät) vedetään uskonnonvapauden suojan taakse, seurauksia voi olla: - Tarpeellisen kritiikin hiljentäminen (“islamofobia”). - Rinnakkaisyhteiskunnat, joissa maallinen laki ei päde samalla tavalla. Tätä tapahtuu koko ajan länsimaissa (kannattaa katsoa @Kuuntelija-podcastista eilen julkaistu jakso @HanneleA_H kanssa) - Tasa-arvon ja yksilönvapauksien heikentyminen. Kaikki muslimit eivät aja tätä, ja kannatus vaihtelee. Silti tutkimukset (mm. Pew) osoittavat monissa maissa vahvaa tukea sharian asemalle, eikä länsimainen sekularisaatio ole edennyt samalla tavalla kuin kristinuskossa. Siksi poliittisia vaatimuksia pitää arvioida samoin kuin muitakin ideologioita, ei pyhänä ja kritiikin tai arvioinnin yläpuolella olevana "uskonnonvapautena".
14
29
2
282
12,916
I have supported Israel for a long time. After thinking about my position for a while, I have come to a clear conclusion: I still support Israel and probably always will. My reasons are many, including: 1. I have been to Israel twice and have met numerous Israelis. The people of Israel are the most wonderful, kindest, most joyful people I have encountered. 2. I have extensively talked to both Israelis and Palestinians. Israelis want nothing more than peace. The other side not so much. 3. Israel is the safest and best place for Christians in the Middle East. Christians are thriving and the majority of them are happy with life. Being against the one nation were Christians are safe would be very stupid. Israel treats minorities exceptionally well. 4. Israel was brutally attacked by terrorists many times, despite their repeated (and in my opinion excessive) attempts to make peace by giving hostile countries and populations land to live on and many more compromises. The final attack on October 7 crossed all lines and taught Israel the lesson that you can never placate Islamic terrorists. I have seen more footage from October 7 than most Israelis have and I will never forget the gruesome acts of vile barbarism inflicted on innocent people, with the approval and celebration of most of the Palestinian population. I would support any nation fighting back until the end after such atrocities that are incomprehensible to sensible human beings. 5. Israel is fighting my enemy and your enemy if you are not an Islamist. Israel is fighting Islamists whose goal it is to dominate the Middle East and restart the caliphate. Islamists want to subjugate most of us and outright kill many of us including me. Israel is therefore a natural ally and I am happy to support them against the great evil in this world. 6. I have actually deeply studied the history of Israel, especially the 19th and 20th centuries. Only one side has consistently tried to build a peaceful future for all and that is Israel. "Palestine" is a late invention to fight and eradicate Israel. It should never be allowed. Had the Palestinian Arabs agreed to peace in the 1920s, 1940s, 1960s, 1980s, 1990s, or even possibly in the 2000s, we wouldn't be in this situation. 7. While I strongly disagree with Judaism and Jews may strongly disagree with my beliefs, I also value Judaism and Jewish beliefs and values which are mostly in line with Christian beliefs and values. The Apostle Paul had a very special love for his fellow Jewish people, even if they rejected his belief in Christ. He also told us that God loves them for their patriarchs and never revokes his gifts and callling. (Romans 11:28-32) 8. Israel built a beautiful nation that is unlike any other in the region. 9. The struggle and resilience of the Jewish people and their regathering and revival of their culture is unlike anything seen in human history, and I appreciate and love it. 10. I just want to. I don't care how many people jumped on the anti-Israel trend.
164
472
22
3,139
44,245
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
The Israel Palestine conflict in one picture
305
2,811
71
22,328
863,123
Replying to @YossiBenYakar
Palestine was Jewish. People don’t understand that before 1948, many Arab Muslims disliked the name Palestine. They wanted to be part of Greater Syria. That idea belonged to Dar al-Islam, which is still a common framework in parts of the Muslim world.
2
2
13
587
1. Israel gibt Gaza Wasser 2. Die EU & UNO zahlen die Wasserleitungen 3. Die Hamas gräbt die Wasserleitungen aus, macht daraus Raketen um Israel anzugreifen 4. Hamas attackiert Israel und tötet über 1000, hauptsächlich Frauen & Kinder 5. Gaza hat kein Wasser mehr, die UNO Beauftragte gibt Israel die Schuld
Access to water under Israeli apartheid. Imagine making fun of it.
176
2,058
36
11,327
235,710
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
What would you do? If you were defending your country, saw a kid with an RPG about to blow you and your platoon of fellow soldiers to pieces.. Just let him blow you up and kill you all? Gazans are the only group on the planet that will put an RPG in the hands of a child and send that child soldier to the frontline and then complain about “child killers” and whine when that child soldier gets killed. Palestinian terrorists released this video themselves. Proudly showing their disgusting tactics. They are sickening. When Golda Meir said this: “We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us” This is what she was talking about. They use their kids in such disgusting ways. Not to mention the indoctrination and brainswashing to make them believe they must martyr themselves for the “cause” [see thread]
161
627
61
1,823
43,010
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Explaining why he left Islam is now "Hateful Conduct" on X.
X is censoring my account because I said this which is true 😳 @elonmusk where is free speech for ExMuslims? 👀
16
81
3
536
12,631
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Remember, all of these countries had their own distinct cultures and traditions before Islam.
348
8,722
309
18,442
213,769
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
One of the things that helped me build cosmopolitan libc was not having a cell phone until 2023. I didn’t even have a drivers license or a passport when I was working with Mozilla and Google. I spent all my time in GNU Emacs and GNU Screen and PuTTY.
11
13
3
481
31,037
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Orwells Dystopie 1984 wird in der EU Realität! Erst die Chatkontrolle, DSA und jetzt: Von der Leyen bestätigt, dass jeder in der EU eine App der EU für die Identitätsverifizierung nutzen muss, bevor er auf soziale Medien zugreifen & dort posten kann.
1,080
3,453
281
13,239
519,767
Muistatteko vielä. Saksan pääministeri katkaisi lomansa Uniper kriisin takia ja meidän pääministeri Sanna Marin lähti festareille! Saksaan lähetettiin Tytti Tuppurainen ja hinta 5,8 miljardia euroa tappioita. #vasemmistohallitus hs.fi/talous/art-20000099870…
75
220
11
2,196
37,531
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Let me be honest. I wanted to stay Muslim so badly. Not even because of God at first, but because of the life attached to it. My dad’s businesses were waiting for me. Signed and ready. My mom’s community. Doctors, lawyers, politicians. Connections everywhere. Success was laid out in front of me. There was even an arranged marriage lined up. A doctor. Beautiful future. House. Wedding. Stability. All I had to do was say one sentence: “Yeah, I still believe.” That was it. Keep the money. Keep the family approval. Keep the life. But here’s what ruined it for me: I could not unsee Jesus. Once I really read the Quran and compared it to the Gospel, I couldn’t force myself back into pretending. And honestly, knowledge becomes heavy at that point. Because I didn’t leave Islam to rebel. I left because I could not betray what I believed was true. No business opportunity, no relationship, no comfortable future was worth denying the King who gave His life for me. So yeah, my life would have been easier if I stayed. But when Jesus says, “I am the way,” you don’t answer with, “But the other path feels safer.” You pick up your cross and walk.
175
652
26
3,536
40,637
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
You know what wrecked me when I was converting to Christianity? Jihad is literally the gospel in reverse. Once I saw it, I couldn't unsee it. The gospel says Christ shed His blood for YOU. Jihad says you shed your blood for ALLAH. Jesus lays down His life to save His enemies. Jihad calls you to take the lives of enemies in pursuit of God's favor. Christianity says the Shepherd dies so the sheep can live. Jihad says the sheep die hoping the Shepherd accepts them. They are mirrors. One is grace, the other is striving. One says, "It is finished." The other says, "Do more." Jesus never asked me to earn God's love with my blood, he proved God's love by shedding His own. That's why the cross changed everything for me. Jesus didn't come to tell us how to die for God. He came to die for us so we could truly live. PRAISE GOD! I AM FREE! Now, we need to make all the Muslims Christian.
644
6,677
309
29,549
530,107
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Melko dystooppista. Puheenaiheen ”Isoveli valvoo sinua” -jakso, joka käsittelee Chat Controlia, estetty Youtubessa koko EUn alueella.
Replying to @klaus_koo
100% EU:n junailema sensurointi
35
250
11
1,500
42,563
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Replying to @ArttuRintanen
”Ratkaisu väärille mielipiteille on, että valtio päättää kuka saa julkaista sisältöä.” Tuo ajatus on historian saatossa testattu moneen kertaan. Tulokset eivät olleet kovin demokraattisia.
17
106
1
2,810
28,547
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Remember, each of these countries once had their own cultures and traditions before Islam.
166
2,940
128
7,660
95,702
Joel Yliluoma retweeted
Can anyone help me understand this? Because I genuinely don’t get it. LGBT people are imprisoned, tortured, and killed in ‘Palestine.’ So how come they are the biggest supporters of Palestine?
5,460
3,803
493
17,881
1,859,317