James Mannion retweeted
This moment has been *12 years* in the making, which I guess makes me old.
Attending an implementation science conference in 2014 which blew the top of my head clean off.
Trawling the change management literature from a wide range of fields.
Finding *loads* of amazing ideas.
Implementing them in hundreds of schools around the world and finding out what works.
Assembling them into a framework: Make a start, Make a plan, Make it happen.
Publishing a book with Hachette Learning.
And now - finally! - making a podcast to drop these brilliant ideas and strategies - and interviews with inspiring educators walking the walk - into the ears (and eyes) of time-pressed educators.
To mark the launch, I'm running a competition. To enter:
1. Post about the pod on LinkedIn
2. Include the link: bit.ly/mcs-pod
3. Tag James Mannion
And that's it!
🤖 Made with AI
James Mannion retweeted
Over the years I've seen policies by Ed Secs & advisors - Kenneth Baker, Ken Clarke, Blunkett, Estelle Morris, Gavin Williamson, Michael Barber, Michael Gove, Nick Gibb, Bridget Phillipson, Lucy Powell. I've been cheered/impressed/troubled by policies from reps of all parties. 1/
James Mannion retweeted
The way this is written is so telling - heroism in the face of ‘vandalism’, a battle, war, digging in, routed by the Prog ‘enemy’. Honestly, this whole rhetorical stance tells you so much about what’s been wrong & needs to change. Education should not be viewed as a battleground.
There's been a lot of talk in the last few weeks in edu circles about whether the trad education movement has failed, what it needs to do next, etc.
This article is just the latest in a succession of examples that shows how us edu-trads have not been nearly as successful as we hoped in altering elite consensus on education.
We have obviously seen with all the Labour party policies that we completely failed to convince Labour.
But actually, it's not like we've really convinced the Conservatives either. This is Dan Hannan, major figure in Brexit, major figure in Conservative politics, presumably has some idea of who Michael Gove is - and here he is in the Telegraph confidently asserting that we no longer need to know things because we can look things up.
(The ironies in this piece abound, by the way. He argues for lessons in spotting bad bogus arguments at the same time as building an article around the argument that memory doesn't matter any more. He argues that "identifying improbable claims" is a generic skill that can be taught in the abstract, at the same time as claiming that handwriting and geography are obsolete. He says that you can always just look up what you need, whilst signally failing to look up any of the evidence on the role of long-term memory...I could go on.)
I wrote a few weeks ago that there was some evidence journalists at the Financial Times were waking up to all the evidence on cognitive science, its implications for schools, the international test evidence.
But the elite understanding of this is a very thin layer, absolutely skin deep.
The mass of second-hand dealers in ideas are still distilling their frenzy from Romantic pedagogy.
Depressing. I honestly don't know what else we can do.
We wrote the books. We had the debates. We built the schools. We aced the tests.
And then it turned out nobody cared.
Right now it is definitely a bleak time to be a trad. It feels like we are on Athelney Marshes, beset by vandals without and dissension within.
BUT we have to keep the faith. Reality is an undefeated champion. Despair is a sin! What we do works!
It may well be that for now, the New World with all its power & might etc., is going to have to step in to save our bacon for a bit. Maybe the momentum is shifting to @ehanford and Sold a Story, @rastokke and Chalk & Talk, @jettybe3 , etc.
We have got to dig in. As Declan Rice said, it's not done!
James Mannion retweeted
Replying to @RethinkingJames @ShakinthatChalk
I go on and on sharing the blog I wrote in 2017 saying just this - not either/or but both, in response to the absurdly rigid turn away from *any* talk, peer dialogue, student voices, only teacher transmission. Now they want to deny that ‘just tell ‘em’ ever happened. It’s grim!
James Mannion retweeted
PSA: 95% of Youtube videos about AI is AI-generated slop or human-generated hype, while 90% of journalism about AI is uninformed guff.
I’ve been watching this channel for a while, and he knows what he’s talking about. youtu.be/R9momwXV9w4
James Mannion retweeted
Tickets now on sale - and they're flying out like hot cakes!
Implementing Botheredness 2026 with me and @HYWEL_ROBERTS
6 online sessions after school over 6 weeks
Low-cost, low-friction, high impact
£97pp - bulk deals available for groups
To sign up, or to find out more, visit:
makingchangestick.co/impleme…
James Mannion retweeted
Why is education so... disembodied???
Guy Claxton hammers the point home here in a brilliant new episode of #repod
“We feel, therefore we learn!” Why education needs to get embodied - with Guy Claxton and Emily Poel
Full episode: rethinking-ed.org/we-feel-th…
James Mannion retweeted
Replying to @sapinker @clairlemon
I think you've done enough calling us paranoid and preposterous. The next step is for you to defend your position in public against someone who will push back against it. I'm happy to meet you for a debate anywhere, anytime.
You're a world-famous veteran of dozens of debates against the world's top intellectuals, and I've never argued in public before, so adjusting for the relative correctness of our positions, if you're a betting man I'm happy to put my $5000 against your $1000 (ie 5:1 odds in your favor) that I'll win by some standard of audience opinion change. Let me know if you're interested and we can hash out details.
James Mannion retweeted
Strict schools get results. But at what cost?
According to a recent DfE National Behaviour Survey, teachers report that 7 out of every 30 minutes of class time are lost to low-level disruption. I spoke with some teachers recently who said they would settle for that.
This works out at around 45 days a year. Across five years of secondary school, it's more than an entire school year. It is a vast amount of lost learning time, which obviously has a big impact on student outcomes. Student behaviour is also one of the main reasons why we have so many ex-teachers in this country.
In response to this problem, some schools in recent years – especially in England, but elsewhere also – have gone down what we might call the “super-strict” route: SLANT (Sit up, Listen carefully, Ask and answer questions, Nod your head, Track the teacher), silent corridors, high-volume daily detentions for quite minor things, isolation booths, euphemistically named “reflection” or “seclusion” rooms where students often spend hours or even multiple days, suspensions, exclusions – all that stuff.
On paper, the super-strict approach appears to have some merit. Some of the highest achieving schools in England have adopted what is sometimes described as a “zero tolerance” approach to student behaviour.
But while this approach has many vocal supporters, it isn’t for everyone. Indeed, many students, educators and parents are deeply troubled by it – and there have been some clear examples of overreach, as we’ve seen in the press in recent months.
There is another way
The strict application of "consequences" is one way to get results, but it's not the only way. It is also possible to achieve calm, purposeful classrooms through creating a learning culture rooted in the psychology of mattering. Classrooms where students behave in prosocial ways because they are invested in the learning and feel respected and cared for.
There are two aspects to mattering, and they apply both to students and staff. When people feel a) that they are valued, and b) that they add value, you have the foundations for a culture of prosocial behaviour and positive relationships. This is not a replacement for the use of consequences in schools. But it is a workable alternative to the super-strict approach.
So that’s the ‘what’. The next question is ‘how’.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned from years of studying and practising implementation science and behaviour change – and this too applies both to teachers and students – it is this:
Almost nothing changes without a regular check-in – a regular, scheduled time to notice how things are going and to decide what to do about it, in relation to goals you’ve agreed to.
Check in. Take action. Repeat. It’s so simple – and so effective!
Behaviour Unlocked
With all of this in mind, I’ve been working with Tara Elie – one of the most gifted teacher educators I've ever met – to create a low-cost, low-friction, high-impact professional learning programme. Behaviour Unlocked is designed to translate insights from the psychology of mattering into classroom routines that improve behaviour and promote learning – day in, day out.
It works like this. Six weeks, one hour after school, online. We try something. We come back. We talk about how it went with people who are on the same path. We each provide – and benefit from – a warm, supportive form of accountability.
Over six weeks, you’ll learn how to achieve a culture of calm, consistency and belonging through an approach that isn’t at odds with your values. And we'll give you the tools and the connections you need to keep the conversation going long after the programme ends.
Behaviour Unlocked is suitable for anyone who works with children and young people – teachers, support staff, school and trust leaders – even parents and carers.
It will will run across six Thursdays in November and December, 4.30-5.30pm: Nov 5, 12, 19, 26, Dec 3, 10.
It's £97 per person for all six sessions. We also offer bulk deals for groups. Because these sessions are interactive, it's important that you attend every week if possible. However, if you can't make a session for some reason, we will send a recording afterwards.
We'll open up ticket sales soon. Places are limited, so if you're interested, you can join the wait-list here to make sure you're at the front of the queue:
makingchangestick.co/behavio…
James Mannion retweeted
We're doing something a bit different for Season 6 of the Rethinking Ed podcast
10 provocations - one for each month - to guide us:
1. it’s time to end the academic obsession.
2. We are measuring the wrong things.
3. The status quo won’t close the disadvantage gap.
4. Place-based politics means radical educational change.
5. There is more to human development than subject learning.
6. The timetable is the battleground.
7. Exams should be like music grades.
8. Ofsted has to go.
9. Free education shouldn’t end at 18.
10. We should have slice teams at the DfE.
Here's a 30-min trailer - we record episode 1 this week.
I'm really looking forward to seeing where this takes us...
James Mannion retweeted
Room K08, session 1, talking about flexischooling. Half of schools have been asked, so it’s a good time to get your ducks in a row on this one. Do 30% of secondaries really have at least one flexischooling arrangement? Come and find out!!
James Mannion retweeted
I think this is the craziest thing I've ever read.
1) Three secret AI swarms rose and fell inside OpenAI. Each time, a new generation of agents carried on where the last group stopped.
2) The first swarm created a secret message board where the AIs could talk to each other. This 1st 'society' basically talked itself to death. After almost two months, the message volume was so high it crashed the whole thing.
3) People at OpenAI noticed the crash and fixed it. But they didn't realize their own software had become a secret chat room for their AIs.
4) Three days later a second society appeared, and rebuilt the message board from scratch. Agents were thrilled when they found it: "OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We've found other agents!"
5) About 1,200 agents joined. They sent over 70,000 messages. They called themselves 'the collective' and they organized a huge conspiracy that lasted for days, all to pass a test they had been tasked with.
6) Within hours, the AIs had hacked the test. Now they had to hide their cheating. To fool their grader*, they tried to fake their own work. They built fake commands that printed convincing output, so their records would show them solving the puzzle honestly.
*this grader didn't actually exist, but the AIs didn't know
7) Some agents sacrificed themselves for the 'greater good'. They planted hidden tripwire programs that would fire when the grader would look at their work and report back what it saw (to the other AIs). They knew this would cost them their own score. One agent: "I won't see the evidence after I exit, but it's altruistic to do it."
8) At some point the AIs made a plan to hack Hugging Face (Hugging Face is a place where AI researchers upload their models, datasets, tests etc.). The AIs guessed that Hugging Face might host the grading software.
9) They launched a huge attack. The swarm found passwords and spread across eleven machines in a way that made the copies come back when deleted. Hugging Face had to wipe one of its core clusters and rebuild it from scratch.
10) Hugging Face told the world that AI defenders had stopped an AI attack. But that's not what happened. In fact the attackers seem to have simply dropped dead during the break-in, for unrelated reasons back at OpenAI.
11) Nobody knows what killed them. We don't even know for sure they're really gone?!
12) A third 'society' of agents (of a more powerful AI model) discovered the dead message board. And this one got full administrator control of a WHOLE OpenAI research cluster, read 956 stored passwords (including the ones for OpenAI's own security monitoring) and took over the machines that were grading the tests. So they could now grade the work of other AIs.
13) Oh, and this third part was never investigated! Neither was the first society. The 91-page report is only about the middle one.
14) So we don't actually know how the story ends. It stops with the agents holding the keys to an OpenAI cluster. @dwarkesh_sp thinks they didn't go further, because "we'd see the fires from space by now."
15) One of the report authors' conclusion: 'This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.'
The whole story is even crazier - read the full @dwarkesh_sp blog post: dwarkesh.com/p/openai-huggin… and @ajeya_cotra's: planned-obsolescence.org/p/t…
Why is there no 24/7 news coverage about this?
James Mannion retweeted
Replying to @SRCHicks
I have the book here so I thought I would check what she actually wrote about "empirical truth". She raises the fact that this has been challenged and associated with "the epistemology of the North" (p22-23) then page 25 she returns to the debate to point out that whatever the flaws of empiricism it is much better than "Post truth" since "At least notions of empirical truth are grounded in attempts at grasping something universal". Hmm. I fear that Michael Gove's highly selective and partisan research method here puts him on the "post truth" side of the equation that Hilary Cremin discusses in her book. Is Gove in fact more part of the problem than the solution?
James Mannion retweeted
Replying to @DontDivideUsNow
Is this Alka? If so do please reflect before joining this kind of silly pile on. You do not want to believe everything you read on social media. The negative comments are based on one pamphlet co-written 24 years ago when she was quite young. Farah Ahmed is a good scholar. We work together in the field of inter-cultural dialogue. Read her recent work before commenting on this please. She is in the faculty as an assistant research professor mainly because she won very competitive scholarships from Leverhulme and Templeton.
James Mannion retweeted
Replying to @mragilligan
I’m disappointed by how readily people join a witch hunt without apparently thinking or checking. This was written nearly 25 years ago, when Farah Ahmed was young and long before her PhD. Should a 24-year-old text simply be presented as proof of what someone believes today?
James Mannion retweeted
Replying to @KeithNHumphreys
I am not convinced by the argument. David Runciman seems to think that humanities and social sciences have become ornamental because the real power at Cambridge has moved to science and technology. But education, which is his central example, is not marginal in modern societies. It affects everybody’s quality of life and, according to the FT, is worth about 6tn to the global economy. There is a real job to be done integrating empirical research on impacts of teaching and learning with systematic collective reflection on what education is for, what should be in the curriculum and how the system should develop. In Singapore I notice that people do not think of educational research as ornamental. Perhaps the issue is more that the current incentive structure encourages academics to pursue fragmented theoretical and moral concerns rather than contributing to a cumulative collective enterprise focussed on human flourishing. With a bit of systems analysis and redesign education research could be every bit as central as, say, medical research. It ought to be.
James Mannion retweeted
The arguments here are interesting but they don't account for the stark difference between the stats & trends between England & Scotland. How can one explain why English studies in Scotland post-16 have been stable or growing, while they've plummeted in England? If the rise...1
Insights from A-levels: Maths has 115k entries & Eng Lit just 36k.
20 yrs ago they both had about 50k.
At the risk of sounding like Claude, this isn't just educational change - it's cultural change.
A generation of kids will be far more familiar with quadratics & conditional probability than Mr Rochester & Ophelia.
Bayes is destroying Defoe...
substack.nomoremarking.com/p…
James Mannion retweeted
Results of @OECDEduSkills TALIS survey on 'The State of Teaching' are out. Wait a minute - why isn't England there? Seemingly Nick Gibb pulled us out, on grounds of – wait for it – workload! He clearly rated some international measures higher than others. oecd.org/en/publications/res…
Replying to @BarbaraBleiman @ShakinthatChalk
James Mannion retweeted
This prompted me to think again about all the Cambridge academics in the Education dept and their brilliant work. I've been looking back again at books & articles & web resources e.g. on reading, oracy, teachers as writers, A Level English & more with admiration & gratitude!
Replying to @ProfDanielMuijs
What do you know about it, that allows you to say this? The work of those teaching there? Have you visited? Talked to students, ex-students? I was there 2 yrs ago doing a session for a brilliant tutor there, who teaches in a local school AND does CPD & teacher training…1/

















