Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
Bad policy, bad character make bad politics: erratic tariffs, impulsive Iran war, blanket pardons, apparent corruption, weaponized justice, ICE brutality, mountainous deficits, hiding Epstein, abandoning allies and coddling enemies. Hoping for a course correction, for the country and for my party.
š
A reminder to @oren_cass that America hates your tariff agenda. And this one is from the NBC exit polls:
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
Dummy-manders, no focus on top issues, insane messaging, open corruption and God awful MAGA candidates. All while sitting on untold millions in campaign funds.
Trump has essentially been quoting Otter from Animal House to the GOP for 10 years: āYou f**ked up, you trusted us!ā
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
Republicans - after 10 years, if ever there were a time to be honest with yourselves (after Jan 6, of course), this is it.
Donald's entire career has been for he/him. He's not for you.
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
This is an interesting and actually pretty bold move by Vance. Donāt know any VP (since Henry Wallace?) has tried to do something like this. Weāre in uncharted waters in so many ways over the next two yearsā¦
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"āwhether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnāt sharp enough down the stretch. Iām sure thatās true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollsterāone of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weād lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheās also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementāby focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, āI told you soā: youāre right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letās take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
The post-Trump era in American politics begins today. The Trump GOP coalition is obliterated. He's a loser of historic proportions. And the Dem tsunami brings a slew of moderates to their big tent. Advantage Dems if they can hold the middle.
New @CookPolitical post-election analysis: Total annihilation of the Trump coalition, w/ Dems in striking distance of 56 Senate seats and 260 House seats, depending on uncalled races. cookpolitical.com/analysis/nā¦
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
With Darline Graham in trouble in South Carolina, remembering this famous tweet from her brother.
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
Tonight is rapidly turning into a preview of what a JD Vance 2028 electoral map would look like.
For those of you scoring at home (btw, official scorer is ruling E-47) -> A Guide to What Weāll Know on Election Night, Hour by Hour nytimes.com/2026/11/03/upshoā¦
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
Expert analysis on some of the congressional races in California with @aacosta30 and @RobStutzman.
- Kevin Kiley vs Richard Pan
- David Valadao vs Randy Villegas
- Incumbent Dems vs new/progressive challengers
California adopted a new water plan. It's unlikely to end the state's water wars calmatters.org/commentary/20⦠via @DanCALmatters
šāNoonan pleaded for a thorough and clean stomping to help begin the GOPās reformation. It was the latest, and most public, example of what has been a recurring theme among Republican professionals: a quiet prayer for a good ass-kicking.āš
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
Analysis of the LA Mayorās Race: will support from Rick Caruso help Mayor Bass win over voters?
@RobStutzman and @aacosta30 weigh in.
The Don wants his taste.
NEWS: Trump erupted after he learned Alina Habba signed a $50 million deal. He told allies she should donate a portion of that money to his future presidential library or another Trump entity. He also suggested the family should not pay out her contract.
nytimes.com/2026/10/29/us/poā¦
Rob Stutzmanš½ retweeted
āItās a new Republican Party! We want the Bushes and the Cornyns to GET
THE HELL OUTā hey where are you going?!ā
New polls show veteran Bay Area Democrat Mike Thompson losing sfgate.com/politics/article/⦠via @SFGate






















