Hi Helen, I am going to answer this comprehensively because it is important that the public - who you currently don't represent because you actually represent the views of GVDN and GAVI - are made aware of the tricks that "vaccine safety" organisations pull to hide vaccine adverse events, particularly in black box vaccines like the current genetic therapies that you seem to know very little about. I hope you take the time to read to the end. 1⃣ the chart that you disingenuously show "doesn't show an increase in cancers" is clearly labelled as projections, which means that no new data was added since the vaccine rollout. I have highlighted it in the attached graphic. 2⃣ the link I attached from the @ABSStats clearly showed an increase in cancer mortality from 2021 onwards, which has not been explained and by definition is not from "COVID" (which is the standard scapegoat for the vaccine manufacturers via govt quangos such as yours). To clarify this further I have attached a graph of cancer deaths from the ABS source for the last 6 years including a trendline based on 2015-2020 showing the significant jump in cancer death certifications since 2021. This increase amounts to 2300 excess cancer deaths alone in 3 years. For the reader, that is 2300 people who should not have died, even accounting for the increasing trend (which is a whole other story). 3⃣ You are not an oncologist (which is a recognised specialty and takes years of training) but a vaccinologist (not a recognised specialty other than by the vaccine industry with a diploma from a 2 week course at a pharma institute). You therefore have not experienced the individual cases of rapidly progressing cancer that those on the ground have, and have talked about. The most (in)famous of these being the case of Michel Goldman who published his own case of turbo cancer (graphic attached). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3490… These may be small numbers but they are devastating to those affected, who include young men and women in their 30s. Saying these people don't exist is disgraceful. 4⃣ You and your networks have denied the mechanisms by which these products can induce cancer which are multiple. They include p53 suppression, insertional mutagenesis, SV40 enhancer (plasmid) transfection, oncomir activity, cGAS-STING and a whole host of other mechanisms. These are published mechanisms for oncogenesis about which you know nothing and choose to know nothing. Instead of looking to see whether they have affected the reported cancers you just say there is no mechanism for them to cause them. That is an abrogation of duty to the public and is an out and out lie. You have stated that falsely in your document archived here archive.md/TJEfu. 5⃣ You claim to represent a group that monitors vaccine safety but at every step you ensure that nobody can look at vaccine safety issues. The end result of that is not only an increasing distrust in the vaccine industry but there is already a spillover into all medicine. People are now avoiding allopathic medicine in unprecedented numbers and it is because of your Pharma-invested groups lying to the public. This is what the public are telling those of us who actually bother to listen. 6⃣ We are not allowed to look at whether an unusual or hyperprogressive cancer is vaccine-related because the medical regulators and the governments who issue lab certifications have instilled fear into anyone who wants to, that they will lose their registration. You will not lobby to change this because it is not in your interest to do so. The end result is that there is not one lab in Australia or New Zealand which is allowed to test tumours for spike protein, SV40 enhancer or plasmid integration. If you think I am wrong on this, provide the list of labs. You, the government, or any of the conflicted media organisations cannot say that turbo cancers do not exist without these tests and are therefore making false statements to the public. And finally this: You are the director of the GVDN which self declares: "Collaborating on vaccine safety and effectiveness studies using health data from around the world" Yet you appear to have no interest in actual vaccine safety, but only in providing the perception of vaccine safety. I think you will declare whether this is true or not in the way you respond to this essay... ▶️If your response is to say that you will take this information on board and now lobby for labs to test for these inclusions, I - and others - will support you in that endeavour. If you are confident in your vaccine safety stance you would be happy to do this. However, your first step would be to retract your document on turbo cancer until you have done this work. ▶️If instead your response is derogatory or disparaging then we know exactly where "vaccine safety data networks" stand. The ball is in your court. On behalf of the people of Australia, New Zealand and the other countries affected by your network I hope you make the right choice. It is your opportunity to make the first step to restoring the public's confidence. @BroadbentMP @DrJulieSladden @drmelissamccann @AaronSiriSG @DrJBhattacharya @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @TonyNikolic10