KNOW YOUR ENEMIES ….☠️
This Is The Fabian Society youtu.be/CzNsl4rF7JY?si=HDUx… via @YouTube
It's funny how countries such as UK,Canada, Australia,NZ etc,around the same time got hit with net zero,COVID,trans movement,mass immigration,
inflation, real estate becoming unaffordable.
It would make you think it was planned doesn't it?
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
One Nation will launch YourMoney so every Victorian can see exactly where their tax dollars go.
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
ALBO: WANT TO TURN DOWN THE TEMPERATURE ?
START WITH WHAT TAXPAYERS FUND
Following the horrific attack on Helen Haines, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for Australians to lower the temperature of political debate
He is right to call for civility
Political violence is unacceptable, whoever the victim
But why has @AlboMP & @AustralianLabor enabled it & funded it ?
Labor must explain the standards applied to public funding.
▪️ OnePath Network: A $308,000 Home Affairs grant, despite content describing Zionists as Islam’s “mortal enemies” & dismissing antisemitic attacks as fabricated. Why did the Australian government fund such a vile organisation ?
▪️ Michael West Media: was given a $128,700 grant. Michael West media continually publishes material attacking Australia’s Jewish community, including portraying Australia’s antisemitism envoy as a “Voice to Parliament for Israel”. How does this framing help lower the temperature?
▪️ Randa Abdel-Fattah: received a $870,000 grant. She said Zionists “have no claim or right to cultural safety”. What standards accompany public funding?
▪️ Matt Chun: Received a $42,452 grant. After the Bondi massacre, he published “We Don’t Mourn Fascists”, questioning public mourning for the victims. What accountability follows when such rhetoric subsequently emerges?
▪️ APAN: Victorian government accounts record $74,770 in grants. APAN opposed designating Hamas as a terrorist organisation. What scrutiny informed these payments?
▪️ MyCentre: Labor gave more than $600,000 to the organisation led by Samir Mohtadi linked the the FlyDubai Terrorists who has a history of vile antisemitic & misogynistic rhetoric
Regrettably Premier @BenCarrollMP has NOT ruled out further funding
These examples demand scrutiny of the standards governments apply when distributing public money.
Publish the funding checks. Review the agreements. Enforce the conditions.
Calls to lower the temperature must be matched by decisions about what taxpayers are asked to support
Sadly @AlboMP has repeatedly funded those who have spread hate & undermined Australia’s social cohesion
@australian @theage @theheraldsun @dailytelegraph @couriermail @FinancialReview @smh
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
“Tip of the iceberg”
Drew Pavlou says he and Pete Zogoulas have received more than 1,000 tip-offs in six months while investigating alleged NDIS fraud.
FULL INTERVIEW 👉 nine.social/1aJ6
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
No Australian 🇦🇺 Right or Left, should even bother commenting on politics until they have read this document in full.
💥 Do #Labor voters know that they have been voting for the #British #Fabian Society all this time?
They should, Bob Hawke told us in 1987.
This document describes treason, contempt for our constitution, and their deliberate intention to change our nation for the benefit of the #Fabian society.
archive.is/5NJDA
#auspol
Credit @Paramythia__
Gough Whitlam inspired and transformed the lives of so many Australians.
He seized the opportunities of the future and reimagined Australia’s place in the world.
Gough’s legacy endures in the communities and lives he helped shape.
And now it's there for all to read in Troy Bramston’s tribute to an achiever who transformed our nation.
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
I’ll be honest with you: until recently I didn’t know much about the Fabian Society. Maybe it’s because the English know how to be smooth – so correct me if I am getting something wrong.
The Fabian Society was founded in London in 1884. Named after Quintus Fabius Maximus – the Roman general famous for defeating Hannibal not through direct confrontation but through patience, attrition, and the slow wearing down of the enemy. The name was chosen deliberately. It was the strategy.
Their emblem was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They chose this themselves. It is worth sitting with that for a moment: an organization that selected, as its own symbol, the image of predatory intent disguised as harmless appearance – deception as the founding principle, the operational method, the thing they were most proud of. Not imposed by critics. Self-selected. They were proud of it.
The strategy was simple and devastating: do not storm the institutions. Infiltrate them. Permeate them — their word — gradually, patiently, over generations, placing Fabian-trained people in positions of influence in government, academia, media, and the civil service, until the institutions produce Fabian outcomes without anyone having to announce a revolution. The revolution would happen – but slowly, invisibly, bureaucratically, democratically. By the time anyone noticed, the institutions would already have changed.
They founded the London School of Economics in 1895 – the institution that trained generations of politicians, civil servants, economists, and journalists across the entire Commonwealth and beyond. They were instrumental in creating the Labour Party in 1900. They shaped the BBC. They designed the British welfare state. George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Keir Starmer – the list of Fabians who shaped British and global politics is not a footnote. It is the history of the twentieth century’s left, stated plainly. Starmer is not an accident or an evolution of Labour. He is the current expression of a project that has been running for a hundred and forty years – patient, institutional, and entirely consistent with the original strategy.
The Fabian Society is the Gramsci long march through the institutions – but English, so better dressed and better funded, and fifty years earlier. Gramsci theorized what the Fabians had already been doing. The Fabians were the practitioners. The Frankfurt School provided the philosophy. The Fabian Society provided the operational model. And the French Theory provided the cultural packaging. Three projects, different origins, identical destination: the dismantling of Western civilization’s foundations through the patient occupation of its institutions.
What makes the Fabian model more dangerous than revolutionary socialism is precisely its smoothness. Revolution is visible. You can point at the barricades. The Fabian approach produces no barricades – only gradually changing curricula, subtly shifting editorial lines, incrementally revised civil service guidelines, and a succession of reasonable-sounding reforms that individually seem modest and collectively amount to the transformation of everything. The wolf in sheep’s clothing is not just a predator in disguise – it is a predator that has learned to speak the sheep’s language, adopt the sheep’s manners, express concern for the sheep’s welfare, and gradually rewrite the rules of the flock from the inside. By the time you notice, the wolf has been in the room for decades. It was wearing the sheep’s clothing so long that some people forgot it wasn’t a sheep. The deception was not incidental. It was the method.
The wolf in sheep’s clothing is obłuda (👇🏻) with a long-term strategy. Zakłamanie with a hundred-year plan. The Systemic Lie with a think tank and an endowment.
They were patient. They were deliberate. They were effective.
And the civilization that produced Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, and Churchill barely noticed until it was very late.
The Most Destructive Intellectual Project of the Twentieth Century.
The Frankfurt School. You should know what it was, what it built, and why you are still living inside it.
1. The Institute for Social Research was founded in Frankfurt in 1923 and relocated to Columbia University in 1934 when Hitler came to power. The civilization they had decided to dismantle gave them refuge when another tried to kill them. They spent the next five decades producing the theoretical infrastructure for that dismantling. Western civilization itself was the problem: reason, the Enlightenment, the family, tradition, authority. Not reformed. Dismantled.
2. They called it Critical Theory – and the name is the program. Everything is to be criticized; nothing is to be built. In The Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), Adorno and Horkheimer argued that Western reason — the reason that produced Newton and the rule of law — contained the seeds of Auschwitz. Not that reason had been misused, but that reason itself, taken to its conclusion, produces the death camp. This was not a critique of institutions. It was an indictment of the civilization itself.
3. Adorno gave them the psychological weapon. The Authoritarian Personality (1950) classified conservatism, religious faith, patriotism, and the traditional family not as political positions but as symptoms of a proto-fascist personality. If you believe in the nation or the father’s authority, you are pre-fascist. The opponent was no longer wrong – he was sick. You don’t argue with a pathology. You treat it.
This made dialogue impossible. You don’t persuade someone who is wrong; you diagnose someone who is sick. Politics becomes therapy, and disagreement becomes pathology.
4. Marcuse gave them the political weapon. Repressive Tolerance (1965) argued that tolerating wrong ideas is itself oppression. True tolerance therefore requires suppressing intolerant ideas. The left decides which ideas are intolerant. Everyone else is silenced – not despite tolerance, but "in its name." Censorship dressed in the vocabulary of liberation.
5. The generation that read Marcuse at Columbia, Berkeley, and Yale went on to run universities, media, foundations, NGOs, content moderation departments, and the EU regulatory apparatus. They implemented the argument sincerely because they had been taught it as philosophy. This was the Frankfurt School’s greatest achievement: it produced true believers.
6. French Theory picked up the tools and made them aesthetic. Foucault made the critique of power literary. Derrida made the critique of meaning philosophical. Deleuze made the critique of identity elegant. A political program became a cultural sensibility. You can argue with a program. A sensibility is in the air you breathe. By the time these ideas reached the American campus through the French conduit, they were no longer ideology. They were the water. The fish did not know they were wet.
7. A civilization stands on three pillars: truth exists and is accessible to reason; good is distinguishable from evil; and there is an inheritance worth transmitting. The Frankfurt School attacked all three – systematically and with considerable intellectual sophistication. It produced a generation that knows how to deconstruct and has forgotten how to build. That sees power everywhere and beauty nowhere.
The ultimate achievement was to make destruction feel like progress. Every inherited institution became suspect; every constraint became oppression; every act of preservation became reactionary. Deconstruction became the default, while construction became something that needed to justify itself.
The answer is not another theory.
It is the thing the Frankfurt School most feared: the builder who simply builds, the scientist who follows the evidence, the father who transmits what was transmitted to him.
The deconstruction machine runs on the assumption that nothing is worth building.
Prove it wrong.
Tell the truth, have courage, and build.
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
The AFP identifies social media monitization of independent journalism as funding terrorism. The government funds mainstream media and wants to control independent media too. We have no free speech and no freedom of the press either.
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
🚨🇪🇺 The EU PASSES another ABSURD law while the US invents flying cars.
Brussels has banned "smoky bacon" and "beef and onion" names for meat-free crisps.
Micromanagement at its finest.
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
JUST IN: 🇧🇷 Flávio Bolsonaro officially rejects results of presidential election against Lula da Silva.
"It is impossible to recognize the election results… we will use our legal team, we will request the annulment of these elections."
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
🇧🇷 Things are NOT OKAY in Brazil!
Or the rest of the world, for that matter. But don’t expect Bolsonaro’s supporters to go down without a fight.
This is DEFINITELY not over! 😤
Writer: Jamie
Simone🇦🇺🇮🇪🏴🏴🇺🇸🇩🇰 retweeted
Oi @Keir_Starmer all the way from Canada, my good friend @ezralevant
WEATHERSPOONS POPPY REFUSAL - BE READY FOR WAR 999 DAYS - NATIONAL RESIL... youtube.com/live/1iLbmk0KvUA… via @YouTube



























