Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt) profile picture

Just some guy. Housing policy, bikes, mass transit, New York City, local politics, finance, software engineering, not necessarily in that order.

New York, NY
Joined June 2012
Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)Photo by Jake Schmidt (@TheJakeSchmidt)
Is New York full? No! Most of Manhattan is visibly underbuilt. Let's make it legal to build these missing homes! #YIMBY
13
17
6
95
Replying to @mnolangray
Congratulations! Being a dad is the best, you're going to love it and you're going to be great at it.
70
Wow, Is it really going to be that fast? 1/4 of the time spent on arguments and paperwork? I wonder if that has any corrosive systemic effects.
1
7
131
8 years I've been holding my breath! For this??
1
2
1,534
Replying to @reviewer3com
I have what I think must be the original, archived with Paperpile on July 5, 2020. DM me for a copy.
63
Does a pied-a-terre tax have enough juice to drive NYC property tax reform? I bet not, but we should try anyway.
Great article about the Pied-A-Terre a tax and how we'd be defining something like "$5M market value". The underlying, much bigger story: NYC property taxes and how they often just don't match true market values at all.
5
636
Replying to @sethmpk
Jason Wang was bullied by the marketplace into allowing people to order his food less-spicy, or getting the noodles to go and eating them 20 minutes later, but he just can't believe they're actually doing it. His life's work is to undo these mistakes.
1
105
10,502
Ctrl+A, delete, no nuance required, full repeal
Since 1966, historic districts have steadily expanded to cover much of Lower Manhattan. As more areas are covered, new housing is effectively banned there, driving displacement and higher rents.
17
1,293
I hope that's true, because Goodhart's Law is watching us like a hawk right now. A repetitive maintenance task that takes a small, discrete amount of time and is easily counted, but whose need can be reduced by other projects - dangerous territory!
1
9
945
Replying to @caesararum
They also passed a "zoning resolution" in 1961 that restricts homebuilding and never adjusted it for growth, so now $2.6M doesn't buy you a mansion either.
63
Jake Schmidt retweeted
Your local planning department doesn't need "capacity". They need Ctrl-F+Delete and a paper shredder. All the best neighborhoods were built before zoning--before the regulatory tools of postwar planning to microregulate the private realm & mandate car use were constitutional
3
23
1
262
5,315
The fact that she remarried relatively soon after JFK's assassination was widely commented on at the time, but not the sort of thing that remained in popular consciousness into the next generation. I only learned that in my 30s.
2
1,165
Replying to @CartoonsHateHer
It is sort of odd that her most-used nickname (Jackie O) is from her least famous marriage by a long shot.
2
80
18,200
(I'm sure someone's going to pop in and tell me that London only had a lot of empty houses in 1989 because of the worst-designed law I've ever heard of in my life)
86
The wonders of adequate housing stock: as the drummer for My Bloody Valentine, you can be homeless while recording Loveless and yet sleep in a house every night.
1
2
185
That isn't not an investment just because it was analyzed using Excel in an office on Park Avenue - it's no different than someone researching and deciding to buy GOOG in the evening after work, or a farmer buying up an adjacent empty field for cultivation, etc.
2
59
More seriously: Investment professionals are also paid salaries; those are taxed as ordinary income. Their carried interest is their share of the profits - some fraction of which is the profits from the partnership making a long-term investment and holding it until it paid off.
1
56
To put some capital substantially at risk!
1
1
46
I also don't want to let it go unsaid that those two are both good tax principles. And they interact in a way that makes sense, is easy to understand when you dive in, and produces a good result (investment, through broad and deep capital markets).
1
44
If a legislator wrote those two provisions and then was surprised that partners in investment firms were paying the capital gains tax rate on their capital gains, I would think that was a pretty bad legislator. Or, more likely, that they're engaging in some left-wing populism.
2
40
I think it was. We're talking about two things: 1. Long-term capital gains are taxed at a special rate. 2. Investment partnerships are taxed as partnerships, i.e. the partners pay taxes (on their share of the partnership's income), instead of the partnership itself.
2
54