Tim Travis retweeted
Bill Ackman explains where Berkshire Hathaway’s compounding really came from and why so few have copied it
“There’s a book, I think it’s called The Financial History of Berkshire Hathaway, and that’s for geeks. Basically this guy went back and read every 10-Q, whatever, he actually went through the filings, looked at every deal that Buffett ever did, and you follow him over a 60-year period of time. And the vast majority of the value he created at Berkshire was through it actually the ownership of insurance operation.”
“And what’s interesting about insurance is that, running an insurance company, you have two jobs. One is you write business, right? You take risk. You collect premiums in exchange for the obligation to pay future claims. And then you get that, you get money up front, and your responsibility is to invest that money.”
“The vast majority of insurance companies focus only on the liability side of the balance sheet. Buffett was really the first to do focus on actually more on the asset side of the balance sheet than on the liability side. And over time on the liability side, if you manage the assets of an insurance company well and the liabilities well, you can build this enormously profitable compounding tax-efficient machine over time. And the question is, why haven’t other people done this?”
“And the answer is, if you’re really good at investing, you go work for a hedge fund, you go work for Fidelity, you go work for Wellington, but you don’t go work for an insurance company. So the insurance company’s ability to recruit investment talent is very limited. Buffett owned half the company. He was really good at investing, which is why it worked.”
Warren Buffett says the best time to buy is when nobody on Wall Street will answer the phone, and a collapsing market is like going through a slaughterhouse
“Well, the most likely time to buy things is when nobody else will answer their phones. You know, everybody else talks about their wonderful trading departments and everything. Just try them out sometime when markets are collapsing, they don’t answer the phones.”
“And if they do, the bids are subject and the offers are subject and the spread is wide, and then they’ll use the information they get from you about what you want to do to go out and kill you some other way. I mean, it’s really like going through a slaughterhouse.”
Bullish $GOOG
Tim Travis retweeted
I’m enjoying these podcasts with @Greenbackd and @TimTravisValue. In this one Tim mentions that he thinks $FFH.TO got a good deal with the $KW acquisition which I tend to agree with but most investors don’t.
podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcas…
Tim Travis retweeted
Google's investment portfolio is INSANE!
Its SpaceX stake alone is valued at $83B, accounting for roughly 94% of its portfolio.
Here's $GOOGL latest portfolio:
Tim Travis retweeted
The Hyperscaler takeover of Neoclouds begins
*GOOGLE BUYS CRUSOE’S WYOMING DATA CENTER SITE
$OBDC
Got it. And then the commentary on OBDC II is very helpful, especially with some price discovery out there. I guess the question is, how can you guys, kind of, close that gap between the underlying valuations and the public stock price? Is it really just putting that data out there so investors can understand it? Or is there anything else you guys can do from your side?
Craig Packer
CEO & Director
So, it's a great question, and it's one we spend a lot of time thinking about and maybe beyond the investing, it's certainly right up there in terms of our focus. It's our hope by sharing detailed updates on how OBDC II is performing that, that will get at the core of what we hear concerns from investors on, which is the quality of the NAV and the quality of the marks. And I don't think that's specific to OBDC. I think that's been a general concern around private credit over the last year or so. I think our valuation process is very good. I won't repeat how we do it. We use a third party. But we think here we have at OBDC II, a fund that was $1.6 billion less than a year ago. We've now exited or gotten repaid on $1 billion of the $1.6 billion and every position has come out at our marks. And we think by highlighting that to investors on this call and in individual conversations, given all those names are in OBDC that, that should give investors significantly improved confidence in the quality of the marks.
Tim Travis retweeted
Some of the most durable non-cyclical businesses, which are going to end up being of the biggest AI winners in the long run because of their distribution and scale advantages, are trading at:
$META - 11.65x (LTM) Operating Cash Flow
$AMZN - 16.66 (LTM) Operating Cash Flow
$GOOGL - 19.44 (LTM) Operating Cash Flow
$MSFT - 20.32 (LTM) Operating Cash Flow
When there is an indiscriminate sell-off of quality and non-quality companies (search for liquidity), oftentimes, as a long-term investor in quality names, you just have to be thankful for the opportunity.
Tim Travis retweeted
$MELI Advertising revenue growth YoY:
Q3 2026 → 51% (58% FX-neutral)
Q2 2026 → 73% (62% FX-neutral)
Q1 2026 → 73% (63% FX-neutral)
Q4 2025 → 70% (67% FX-neutral)
Q3 2025 → 56% (63% FX-neutral)
Q2 2025 → 38% (59% FX-neutral)
Q1 2025 → 26% (50% FX-neutral)
Tim Travis retweeted
Thoughts on $MELI
I think investors spend far too much time worrying about what $MELI will earn next quarter or next year and far too little time thinking about what this business could become over the next decade.
Rising delinquencies, slower growth in Mexico, and margin pressure from free shipping are all worth watching. But I’ve owned $MELI long enough to remember dozens of concerns that seemed incredibly important at the time and are almost meaningless today.
Here’s something I’ve learned over the years. The problems facing a growing business will constantly change. Some will disappear, others will emerge, and a few will become serious. Your job as an investor isn’t to predict every problem. It’s to understand whether the business is becoming stronger or weaker as it works through them.
And that’s what matters to me with $MELI. Is its competitive position strengthening? Are more people becoming dependent on its ecosystem? Is it building advantages that competitors will find increasingly difficult to overcome? And most importantly, can it continue reinvesting capital today to create substantially more earning power in the future?
Of course, that doesn’t mean giving management a free pass. Credit deserves close attention because there’s an enormous difference between temporarily sacrificing profits to strengthen a business and permanently sacrificing profitability because the underlying economics are deteriorating.
But here’s the bigger point. A company can report wonderful margins today while losing its competitive advantage. Another can report disappointing margins while building a business that will be worth several times more a decade from now. If you only look at the numbers, you might completely misunderstand what’s happening.
Ultimately, I care much more about what $MELI’s competitive position, earning power, and cash generation will look like ten years from now than what its margins look like this quarter or next year. Naturally, the price we pay for that future matters enormously.
🌹
Tim Travis retweeted
Well, it did finally get cheap in 2026.
$BMBL With Bumble's takeover set to close in the coming months, here's a look at how they fared as a public company since IPO since its first day of trading.
Tim Travis retweeted
Michael Burry on $MELI
“I am confident they are building their businesses with moats that will be protective for a long time ... Every time I dig into this company, I wonder what every other analyst is seeing. Just about everything MercadoLibre has been doing makes sense to me, and does not concern me.”
Tim Travis retweeted
Since some ppl are blatantly lying about this fact: 74% said the Iran war was either “crucial” or “a major factor” in their vote. 3/4ths of the electorate. Don’t be gaslit by humiliated warmongers.
Tim Travis retweeted
Dot-Com Crash 2.0 - Intel $INTC
2026: -58% / 24 days
vs
1999: -53% / 27 days
*Trading days.
Tim Travis retweeted
Tech Stocks in Bear Market Territory:
1. SanDisk, $SNDK: -66%
2. Arm Holdings, $ARM: -64%
3. Coinbase, $COIN: -63%
4. Nebius, $NBIS: -62%
5. Seagate, $STX: -60%
6. Marvell Technology, $MRVL: -59%
7. ServiceNow, $NOW: -57%
8. Oracle, $ORCL: -56%
9. AppLovin, $APP: -54%
10. Circle, $CRCL: -54%
11. Super Micro Computer, $SMCI: -51%
12. Micron, $MU: -48%
13. Dell, $DELL: -47%
14. SpaceX, $SPCX: -47%
15. Qualcomm, $QCOM: -43%
16. Broadcom, $AVGO: -41%
17. AMD, $AMD: -39%
18. Robinhood, $HOOD: -38%
19. Alphabet, $GOOGL: -32%
20. Tesla, $TSLA: -32%
21. Palantir, $PLTR: -28%
22. TSMC, $TSM: -28%
23. Meta, $META: -26%
24. CrowdStrike, $CRWD: -26%
25. Nvidia, $NVDA: -25%
The S&P 500 has now erased -$4 trillion in market cap since October 6th.
Tim Travis retweeted
I think we've reached the anxiety stage of the bear market.
The psychology of a bear market:
Every bear market is experienced as a sequence of emotions, and the sequence is remarkably consistent from one cycle to the next. Financial advisers have long used a version of the diagram below to describe it.
The cruelty of the cycle is in its alignment. Confidence peaks when prices, and therefore risk, are highest. Fear peaks when prices, and therefore expected future returns, are most attractive.
An investor who acts on feelings will reliably buy near the top and sell near the bottom.
And electrical equipment, cooling, networking and batteries
Elon Musk says the AI boom will hit a WALL by the end of 2026.
He says the whole industry is about to learn a hard lesson in hardware.
Chip output is exploding, but electricity is nearly flat everywhere outside China.
So the two lines cross this year.
He says by the end of the year, we will be making more AI chips than we can actually turn on.
Millions of them pile up with nowhere to plug in.
In his words, the bottleneck for the next year is not chips, it is raw power.
Whoever can turn on the most chips fastest wins the race.
In the end, the AI race comes down to one thing:
Raw electricity.
— Elon Musk (.@elonmusk) on Dwarkesh Patel's (.@dwarkesh_sp) podcast
Elon Musk says the AI boom will hit a WALL by the end of 2026.
He says the whole industry is about to learn a hard lesson in hardware.
Chip output is exploding, but electricity is nearly flat everywhere outside China.
So the two lines cross this year.
He says by the end of the year, we will be making more AI chips than we can actually turn on.
Millions of them pile up with nowhere to plug in.
In his words, the bottleneck for the next year is not chips, it is raw power.
Whoever can turn on the most chips fastest wins the race.
In the end, the AI race comes down to one thing:
Raw electricity.
— Elon Musk (.@elonmusk) on Dwarkesh Patel's (.@dwarkesh_sp) podcast
Elon Musk says billion dollar AI companies with money to spend can't build power plants fast enough to meet AI's electricity demand.
Every major power project requires approvals and equipment, including:
• Switchgear
• Gas turbines
• Power plant permits
• Electrical transformers
• Utility interconnection studies
• High-voltage transmission lines
• Specialized turbine blades and vanes
If even one component is delayed, the entire project stalls... leaving AI chips without electricity.
Musk says gas turbines are sold out through 2030, with specialized blades and vanes being the biggest bottleneck.
Building more power plants isn't the quick solution AI companies thought it'd be.
— Elon Musk (.@elonmusk) on Dwarkesh Patel's (.@dwarkesh_sp) podcast































