These people, they're like ghosts. Always in the shadows, always hiding behind lies and proxy soldiers. EM theory retired early. scammers you’re warned
USA
Joined October 2012
- Tweets29.4K
- Following2.1K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes37.6K
Pinned Tweet
Investing
If you can’t give me a solid 2 minute speech about why you bought a stock. What they do, what makes them a good investment, what’s causing the earning and ROI? What’s the market conditions are we in rising or falling market?
What’s thier competition.
Why they change people’s lives
What’s technical analysis say?
If you say bc someone told me or beat last quarter then don’t buy. You are gambling
Witcher 4 retweeted
WOW! Democrats are pushing the narrative that Republicans staryed home or flipped, when the actual statistics PROVE the opposite, and that over 1.4 MILLION MORE Republicans voted in 2026 than in 2022.
But Democrats somehow magically gain 19 MILLION new voters? Should I laugh or be mad?
Nobody believes any of this.
On top of this, the mainstream media's own statistics prove that Republicans didn't flip for Democrats either and stayed loyal to their Republican Party from 2024 through 2026.
And just to top it off, 2026 voter turnout was NOT higher than 2024 or 2022, but somehow Democrats gained over 19 MILLION more voters, with some Democrat candidates receiving record vote counts higher than others in presidential elections in previous years?
Nobody believes ANY of this.
Witcher 4 retweeted
Algorithm cracked!
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Witcher 4 retweeted
The early voting analysis showed a 15 point shift to the blue, consistently, everywhere, when in-person voting starting.
At no point did any of the early vote analysts call out fraud. They were coming up with theories for high propensities voting on Election Day, something I disagreed with strongly behind the scenes.
I’m not ruling out the possibility of fraud, but the results were consistent with what early vote showed.
Witcher 4 retweeted
From A Friend 😎
Stephen Miller doesn't walk into rooms. He changes their atmospheric pressure. When the news hit the wire at 14:07 EST Wiles out, Miller in you could feel the oxygen get sucked out of every Democratic strategy session from the DNC's K Street war room to Schumer's Capitol hideaway. Not because Miller is some master strategist. Because Miller is the one man in American politics who treats mercy like a personal failing.
End Quote
Witcher 4 retweeted
The 🇺🇸 IRS just released the new tax brackets for 2027
Single filers (2026 in parentheses):
10%: $12,800 or less ($12,400)
12%: over $12,800 ($12,400)
22%: over $52,025 ($50,400)
24%: over $109,125 ($105,700)
32%: over $208,325 ($201,775)
35%: over $264,550 ($256,225)
37%: over $661,375 ($640,600)
Married filing jointly (2026 in parentheses):
10%: $25,600 or less ($24,800)
12%: over $25,600 ($24,800)
22%: over $104,050 ($100,800)
24%: over $218,250 ($211,400)
32%: over $416,650 ($403,550)
35%: over $529,100 ($512,450)
37%: over $793,650 ($768,700)
THE IRS JUST RELEASED THE NEW 2027 🇺🇸 TAX BRACKETS. HERE'S HOW THEY WORK IN PLAIN ENGLISH
Every bracket got a little bigger to keep up with inflation, so you can earn a bit more before moving into a higher rate.
Step 1: Take what you earn and subtract the standard deduction. That part isn't taxed at all.
- Single: $16,600
- Married: $33,200
Step 2: Whatever's left gets taxed in layers.
Single filers:
- 10% on your first $12,800
- 12% on income up to $52,025
- 22% up to $109,125
- 24% up to $208,325
- 32% up to $264,550
- 35% up to $661,375
- 37% on anything above that
Married couples: the cutoffs are roughly double ($25,600, $104,050, $218,250, $416,650, $529,100, $793,650).
Example: You're single and earn $76,600. Subtract $16,600 and you're taxed on $60,000.
- 10% on the first $12,800 = $1,280
- 12% on the next $39,225 = $4,707
- 22% on the last $7,975 = $1,755
Total: about $7,742 in federal income tax, or roughly 10% of what you earned.
Even though you're "in" the 22% bracket, only your last $7,975 gets taxed at 22%.
Witcher 4 retweeted
"These people are stupid" really fits here. Could they have made it any MORE obvious?
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
Witcher 4 retweeted
Democrats immediately file a bill to kill the tax cap that just passed with massive numbers across New Hampshire. #nhpolitics
Witcher 4 retweeted
CHUCK SCHUMER EMAILS WITH OPEC SHOW DEMOCRATS COORDINATED GAS PRICE SPIKES TO BLAME TRUMP
By Jonathan Gregory
Washington, DC - November 6, 2026
Emails uncovered by the district attorney show Chuck Schumer and Democratic senators coordinating with OPEC leaders to force gas prices higher into the election. The messages describe a plan to keep prices elevated through the final months so voters would associate the increases with Trump. Once the election ended the contacts would reverse and prices would return to normal levels. The strategy relied on the public never seeing the direct communications that timed the spikes.
Highs in gas prices during the last few months match the timeline in the released emails. The coordinated pressure on OPEC created artificial increases that Democrats then used to attack Trump’s record. Officials who participated expected the election outcome to allow an immediate reversal. The plan failed to account for Trump remaining in power and the continued high prices that never dropped on schedule. The district attorney’s documents now place the full sequence of contacts into public view.
The obvious play by the Democrats has been exposed as a deliberate effort to make Trump look bad at the pump. Gas prices were treated as a campaign weapon rather than a market result. The emails confirm the intent to maintain the elevated levels only until the votes were cast. Americans who paid more during those months deserve the complete records released without delay. The coordination stands documented and the planned return to normal never arrived under the timeline they set.
@TrumpNews
ALT THE ARCHITECT: Chuck Schumer at the Podium Whose Emails With OPEC Leaders Planned the Gas Price Spikes to Blame Trump!
ALT THE PUMP: Gas Pump Display Showing the Inflated Prices Democrats Coordinated to Keep High Until After the Election!
ALT THE LOGO: OPEC Sign Representing the Oil Leaders Schumer Contacted to Force Prices Up and Make Trump Look Bad!
Witcher 4 retweeted
I’ve compiled the full list of ‘New valid voter registrations’ done nationwide between 2022-2024 WITHOUT PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP and the total number is 20,283,937
🚨 So 20,283,937 new voters were registered without citizenship checks and Democrats won the Midterms with roughly 20 million extra votes
Here is a breakdown are 37 states that do not require citizenship verification to complete new voter registration and how many new registrations they registered without citizenship checks
California: 4,308,269
Texas: 2,900,357
North Carolina: 1,410,905
Florida: 1,337,303
Illinois: 981,482
Pennsylvania: 842,187
New York: 680,259
Alabama: 572,632
Virginia: 563,781
Maryland: 524,189
Wisconsin: 524,103
Colorado: 498,308
Washington: 473,192
Massachusetts: 465,616
Missouri: 460,197
New Jersey: 425,782
Oklahoma: 388,669
Connecticut: 386,014
Louisiana: 263,705
Arkansas: 246,974
Oregon: 240,611
Kentucky: 220,093
Kansas: 218,739
Idaho: 181,741
Nebraska: 164,491
Nevada: 145,494
New Mexico: 118,141
Iowa: 116,644
Maine: 106,978
Vermont: 81,993
Montana: 78,669
Delaware: 71,902
Hawaii: 64,468
New Hampshire: 61,210
West Virginia: 53,343
Rhode Island: 53,040
Alaska: 52,456
States: 37
Total: 20,283,937
This data comes from the Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report buried on page 192 and 193 of the document
—
Ohh and if you redo this list to include new voter registrations that were done without proof of ID being required it’s even worse
43 states do not require you to show or attach an ID or any other eligibility documents to complete a standard new standard voter registration form
During 2022-2024, there were 24,662,998 new valid registrations across 43 states that were done without any ID
Witcher 4 retweeted
🚨 THE 15% BAND ISN’T A COINCIDENCE. IT’S A FORMULA.
For every 1,000 Trump votes in 2024… only ~850 stayed Republican in 2026. The other 150 landed on the Democrat side.
Same ratio. Every state. Senate and Governor. Red states, blue states — didn’t matter.
R² = 0.88. Drop any state and the multiplier barely moves.
That’s not a “swing.” That’s an algorithm.
Paper ballots. Hand counts. Poll books vs. votes cast. NOW.
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
Witcher 4 retweeted
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Witcher 4 retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Witcher 4 retweeted
This is pretty huge folks
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
Witcher 4 retweeted
Stolen Elections / The 85% - 15% Algorithm is Found
Across 59 Key Races - the SAME formula was used:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Witcher 4 retweeted
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Witcher 4 retweeted
We cracked their cheating algorithm.
85/15 algorithm….for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems.
It’s the same pattern in every state that went blue.
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Witcher 4 retweeted
Holy shit. They knew they were going to win. Just more evidence that they cheated. It's time for 1776 for real.
