
Oil analyst formerly known as Lord Crudehead: funder of hedges; professional drinker of your milkshake. #OOTT
State of permanent balance
Joined September 2012
- Tweets4.7K
- Following688
- Followers17.9K
- Likes7
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
"As many of you may have already learned, while teaching four weeks ago, I was physically attacked by a number of masked individuals in a brutal manner. I will not lie to you. I was extremely upset and shaken after the event, though not only for reasons you might logically expect. This was not only because..."
damien-ernst.be/2026/10/22/i…
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
Fair bit of red ink out there today (and in small-caps its been a bloodbath lately no matter where you are). Always a good reminder that, as ever, any given stock can trade at any given price at all, at any time. You have to know what you own, and not be levered.
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
What an absolute mess, @NateSibley.
When Trump instructed @SecScottBessent to greenlight Russian diesel imports without the authority to do so, he put @USTreasury and @CBP in an impossible legal bind.
An @OFAC license cannot override a federal statute, because Congress took that power away from Treasury in this case. PL 117-109 enacted a blanket statutory ban on all Russian HTS Chapter 27 energy imports (including diesel) with zero administrative waiver authority.
And you're spot on about CAATSA. Even if Treasury claims it can (somehow) license around it, any move significantly altering Russia policy requires a mandatory 30-day notice to Congress and a statutory freeze before taking effect.
The end result? If a Russian tanker soon arrives at a U.S. port, CBP is legally barred from clearing the cargo.
As a few experts have helpfully pointed out, this law incorporates implementation requirements via an executive order that itself permits licenses. Fair enough. But I find it unusually ambiguous—and likely not what Congress intended.
In any case it doesn’t relieve Treasury of the 30 day notice required by CAATSA, as this license clearly “significantly alters” U.S.-Russia policy.
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
Now sell side research is completely losing its mind over the transit uptick.
Obviously i've been watching the Kpler and Vortexa prints, but take someone like @LVision_Trading , whom I've been following lately—a single independent tracker mapped out the entire volume rebound flawlessly weeks ago.
Kind of wild how it only magically became the topic du jour this week isn't it? What i actually wanted to see was whether this run rate is structurally sustainable or already putting in a local top, but crickets on that front.
Between hard bottlenecks on shuttling capacity, Tehran’s clear incentive to knock Trump down a peg while he’s taking victory laps over transit numbers, and this feeling like a textbook sentiment meme top—the urge to aggressively fade this consensus is getting overwhelming. Just saying.
#oott #iran
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
For all the tanker tracking enthusiasts:
Please give @live_ais_com a follow. They post live updates on GoO crude movements, do accurate load estimates and have a great analytics on offer! And are super collaborative and responsive. Great to meet you!
We've been monitoring maritime traffic in/out of the region since the conflict began and subsequently automated the tracking of vessels for alerts through AI-driven algos, which tags 'digital' beacons to vessels based their coord/zones - so can be tracked no matter where they surface next, should they go dark.
Although we have continued to track all vessels transiting the region, we have not surfaced the data publicly in some time now. However, we've put together crude transit data for the last two weeks - right uptil today, to help you observe how crude has been moving through the Gulf of Oman in the past couple of weeks. Link below is to an interactive map of vessel data from 18 Aug.
- Laden with crude GoO outbound
- Date of transit
- Vessels track data
- Barrels of crude
- Destination as received
Hope you find the data useful. All data can be verfied through your fav vessel tracker or with any public source. None hidden or obscure behind any weekly/monthly trend reports.
live-ais.com/gulf-watch.php
#IranWar #Hormuz #Oman #UAE #OOTT
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
I hate to say it, but when I see VLCCs like that, both of which ran from inside the PG to Sri Lanka entirely dark, it gets harder to completely rule out the admin's 10 mbpd number. I still think it's exaggerated/cherrypicked but these tankers are being very sneaky
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
HORMUZ | During past 4 days, visible transits avg at 0.9mbd OUTBOUND / 2.7mbd INBOUND. Tankers still hop in and out dark and I remain convinced that US convoys continue and actual flow shall be closer to 3-5 mbd daily. Vessel list in comments.
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
Implied Hormuz flow of 4.9, 1.9, and 3.5 million barrels over the last 3 days. The 7 day average sits at 2.9 mbpd (deleted the original post because I had missed a VLCC in Saturday's count as pointed out by @p912059g)
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
Thinking more about this. This is almost exactly how the Chandlers (secretive Kiwi multi billionaires) made all their money. No 5 ten baggers in a row per se but 5 multi baggers, in a row, rolling the entire stack forward each time (with leverage.
Went from a few hundred k to >$10bn over 25yrs or something like that
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
The other point is - and it’s one I really agree with - that despite the facetious framing it’s really an affirmation of massive concentration. Forget the 10 baggers, you need to make massively concentrated bets to build wealth, if you are starting small. Diversification does nothing for you if you don’t have your chip stack at the beginning.
That is - max conviction; high concentration; oh and you have to be right.
Upside/downside skew is the real big differentiator in my personal worldview vs Wasteland (I’m guessing) but that’s a separate discussion
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
I’ve decided to make Oil 101 online second edition free.
Because clearly the world needs more experts before the next spike hits.
Grab it now while you still can and pretend like me that you saw it coming.
morgandowney.com/book
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
What is the North Sea physic mkt, and how should the gap between the paper and physical markets be resolved?
Every time I post about the physical market, I see a lot of complaints about why oil prices aren't rising further. Many ppl even criticize me, claiming I’m not explaining things properly.
First, I’ll summarize the basic components of the North Sea market.
ICE Brent Futures: A financially settled paper contract used primarily for broad directional hedging and speculation without the intention of physical delivery.
EFP (Exchange of Futures for Physical): A swap that acts as a bridge, allowing a trader to convert a paper futures position into a physical cargo contract.
Forward Brent: A standardized OTC physical swap for future delivery. It represents actual oil but remains non-dated bc the exact loading schedule is not yet determined.
Dated Brent: The global benchmark price for physical crude. It is assessed daily by agencies like Platts based on actual trades of the most competitive grade within the BFOET+WTI basket, triggered once specific loading dates are confirmed (typically 10-30 days prior).
CFD: A short-term swap representing the price difference between Forward Brent and Dated Brent. It is used to plot the physical forward curve and assess whether the market is in contango or backwardation.
DFL (Dated to Frontline): A swap that links the physical Dated Brent assessment directly to the front-month ICE Futures contract, managing exposure between the physical and financial markets.
Diff (Grade Basis): The premium or discount applied to a specific physical cargo relative to the Dated Brent benchmark. Driven by crude quality, logistics, and refinery demand, this unhedgeable spread is where physical traders generate profit.
This alone should be enough. From there, I’ll explain how the gap between the paper market and the physical market actually closes.
A massive divergence between Dated Brent (physic) and ICE Brent futures (paper) typically indicates acute near-term physical tightness relative to forward expectations.
If Dated Brent remains at $120-130/bbl leading into the expiration of the front-month ICE Brent futures contract (currently around $100/bbl), the futures contract must converge toward the physical price.
The convergence is not optional; it is mathematically enforced by the exchange's settlement rules and market arbitrage. This operates through three primary mechanisms:
1) Cash Settlement via the ICE Brent Index
ICE Brent futures are cash-settled upon expiration and do not involve physical delivery. Expiring contracts are settled against the ICE Brent Index.
The Index is a calculated average of trading activity in the relevant physical Forward BFOET(Brent, Forties, Oseberg, Ekofisk, Troll)+WTI Midland market during the final trading days of the futures contract.
Bc Forward Brent and Dated Brent are intrinsically linked, a physical market sustaining $130 will generate an ICE Brent Index near $130.
Consequently, any futures positions left open at expiration are forcibly settled at this higher Index price.
2) The Arbitrage Channel (EFP Mechanism)
If a $30 spread exists between paper and physical markets, traders will immediately exploit the arbitrage using the EFP mechanism.
Traders buy the undervalued ICE Brent futures at $100 and simultaneously sells a physical Forward Brent cargo at $130. They execute an EFP to swap their long paper futures position into a long physical Forward position.
The newly acquired long physical position cancels out their short physical position, locking in a profit (minus the EFP swap cost). To execute this arbs on a large scale, traders must aggressively buy ICE futures. This massive purchasing volume forces the futures price up until the gap closes and the arb window is eliminated.
3) Forced Short Covering
Market participants holding short positions in the ICE Brent futures market face extreme risk if the physical market disconnects to the upside.
Knowing the contract is destined to cash-settle against a $130 physical Index, paper shorts cannot afford to hold their $100 positions into expiration.
They are forced to buy back their futures contracts to close their positions before the expiry date.
This forced buying—often resulting in a short squeeze—accelerates the upward momentum of the ICE futures price, driving it into alignment with the physical market.
Through the combination of final index settlement and active EFP arbs, the paper market is structurally tethered to physical reality as expiration approaches.
#oott #iran
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
Great news! We've done a two part episode on the history & importance of oil in Iran & the Gulf 1/5
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
"OnlyFarms"
🚜 Curious how American farmers are benefiting right now — or exactly how much each state has saved?
👀📲 ONLYFARMS.GOV
Crudehead🛢 retweeted
In 1507-15, the Portuguese crown built the fort of Our Lady of the Conception in Hormuz, to control trade from India and charge hefty tolls to passing ships. From the outset, holding the fort and controlling the Strait of Hormuz required constant fighting with local emirs; by 1662 the Shah of Persia (backed by British forces) took it for good. After a detailed account of the back-and-forth in a fierce and bloody seven‑month naval battle in 1521–22 in the Strait of Hormuz, Commander Saturnino Monteiro, in the first volume of his treatise "Batalhas e Combates da Marinha Portuguesa,” concluded: "...and thus ended this stupid and useless war of Hormuz, with everything remaining as it had been before."




























