You resort to Whataboutery even when presented with a hypothetical scenario that excludes a revenge attack.
This post suggests that he really didn't know about the adult clinics withholding data.
And he doesn't have the mental acuity to work out the rather obvious reason for the request in the first place.
This, for instance, is a complete lie.
Cass rejected studies that were of low quality.
They used the Newcastle-Ottawa grading system to determine quality.
N-O is used to grade COHORT studies.
This is BECAUSE there were no double-blind studies to draw from.
And here is the relevant paragraph stating that currently (2017 literature review) no data exists.
Do you also think that this position is not outdated? Or do you think the more recent research by international sporting bodies might modify that position?
Replying to @SiameseAbby
Persephone (Persephone! 😆) forgot to look at the camera head on.
That's what you think I wrote.
Let's compare it to what I actually wrote.
🧐
I think it's obvious what's occurring here. Although probably not for you.
🤔










