War Against Radical Leftists, Communists and Fascists# Opinions on geopolitics - Southeast Asian and beyond
Singapore
Joined February 2020
- Tweets1.7K
- Following340
- Followers66
- Likes7.7K
Pinned Tweet
Wolf changes its skin with same intend
They don’t say “I’m a communist” anymore.
Instead they say:
• “We just want equity, not equality”
• “Abolish the police / prisons”
• “Decolonize everything”
• “Gender is a social construct”
• “Climate justice requires ending capitalism”
All of these trace back to Marxist frameworks, just rebranded for Western audiences who would never vote for open communism.
When your ideology has a 100+ million death toll, you don’t fix the ideology. You fix the branding.
Which current movement do you think is the latest rebrand? Drop it below.
Indonesia cutting our natural gas supply is a sharp reminder: nothing is guaranteed.
We do not have the luxury of “moral” choices without consequences. Think Palestine and Maju Forest.
Local activists peddle utopian ideals and accuse the Government of failing or standing on the “wrong side of history.” They are detached from how the world actually works and have no skin in the game when those ideas backfire.
Singapore endures and prospers by doing what is necessary, not what is fashionable.
A French left-wing activist and vocal champion of open migration from North Africa—who routinely defended them and branded any restriction as racism—stood in her upscale boutique trying to stop looters.
She identified herself: “I’m the activist who’s fought for you.” They spat on her, knocked her down, and trampled her. The shop was cleaned out.
She survived, staring at the wreckage of her life’s work, stunned that the very people she’d spent decades inviting in were the ones who destroyed it. French media ran the story and the photo of her standing in front of the looted store.
Look at what’s happening in France and India.
It is exactly why Singapore has strict assembly and protest laws, which activists and liberals hated. They can continue to frame it as suppression of freedom of speech but clear minded Singaporeans know exactly it is not - no one is stopping you from expressing your political sentiments - just do it within the framework of our Laws, which is in place to prevent chaos on the street and social cohesion.
Death108 retweeted
That pervert who's been harassing men and women alike in the neighborhood now claims he's being harassed by them. 🙃 scmp.com/news/china/diplomac…
These activists keep framing their charges as persecution for their causes. That’s false. They deliberately violate Singapore laws, get charged, then play the victim. It is the same playbook they use to champion their chosen political causes, from anti-death penalty campaigns to Palestine.
This isn’t principled dissent. It’s a calculated strategy to erode respect for the rule of law and polarise public opinion. By treating laws as optional and courts as political stages, they normalise defiance and invite others to follow suit. That directly undermines internal security: when legal boundaries are mocked, social order frays.
Their victim narrative also deepens societal splits. It casts the state as an oppressor and their supporters as a persecuted minority, turning policy debates into identity battles.
In a multi-ethnic, multi-religious society like Singapore, that kind of mobilisation is dangerous. It weakens trust in institutions, fuels resentment, and makes compromise harder, exactly the conditions that threaten social cohesion.
Best thread to read if you want to understand what a Malay means in Malaysia.
Did you know Malaysia is uniquely singular globally?
No other modern country legally binds an entire ethnic race to a mandatory religion in its constitution quite like we do under Article 160.
To be Malay by law, you must be Muslim. Period. 🧵👇
ALT Malaysian Constitutional definition of Malay (Article 160).
When Rule of Belief supersede the Rule of Law, even the Constitution can be cast aside and make a mockery of.
Political Islam often works this way. Formal laws are not always necessary. Once a community applies pressure in the name of religion, people comply out of fear. These moral police sees what they do as religious duty, and the rights and interests of minorities are pushed aside in the name of majority.
You can say this action is correct because beer is not allowed is Islam. That is correct and I agree with that.
But Beer is allowed for non-Muslims. To keep the "harmony" the "solution" is to force non-Muslims to go to a speedmart located in a non-Muslim area, which may be far away. Many Malaysians actually think this is the correct approach. My question is: who decides what other product cannot be sold?
There is no solution, because the problem is community sentiment grounded in religious belief. One likely result is that nons will choose to live among themselves, produces ghettos, which is bad for the country in the long run.
Moral policemen rarely consider this, because their thinking is clouded by belief.
If you have a solution, share it. Please do not say we need more laws. This case shows that laws do not decide the outcome. Think it through logically.
#Beer #Malaysia #99Speedmart #PoliticalIslam
Forcing non Bumi out of Malaysia without saying they are forcing non Bumi out of Malaysia
Talk about an apartheid State
therakyatpost.com/news/malay…
“Singapore First means refusing to let a foreign agitator, domestic opportunist, anonymous account or ideological movement decide who our enemies are.”
Don’t let them teach you who to hate.
A great article
facebook.com/share/14nu4T3tH…
Whenever you disagree with leftists and they immediately call you “Right Wing”, now you know where it came from.
instagram.com/p/DdXJH6mGzY-/
Singapore’s new Maintenance of Racial Harmony Act kicks in today (15 Sep 2026).
It empowers MHA to issue immediate restraining orders against hate content, introduces remedial programmes for minor offences, sets up a new Presidential Council for Racial & Religious Harmony, and tightens rules on foreign influence over race-based groups.
Clear message: racial harmony here is non-negotiable—and backed by law.
#Singapore #RacialHarmony #SGPolicy
mothership.sg/2026/09/new-la…
Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment Report 2026
ISD has released the Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment Report 2026.
Key points are:The overall terrorism threat to Singapore remains high.Overseas conflicts and developments have heightened the threat of attacks against Singapore.
Self-radicalisation remains the key driver of the domestic terrorism threat. Youth radicalisation is a pressing concern, with the number of youth Internal Security Act cases almost quadrupling in the last five years. Online platforms, including social media and games, continue to accelerate radicalisation, particularly among youths.
Whole-of-society efforts are crucial. Family members, friends and the community all play an important role in recognising and reporting signs of radicalisation early to ISD at 1800-2626-473.Read the full report here: go.gov.sg/mha-press-releases…
Follow @SGSecureOfficial on Instagram, TikTok and Facebook to stay up-to-date. Together, We Make #SGSecure.
Shame and decency are something that the government of China do not have.
#PalkiSharmaShow: China Tried To Silence The Philippines. It Backfired
@palkisu tells you more.
Good question: Why ?
COMMENT | Why do Muslim converts attack their ancestors' heritage? dlvr.it/TVPqz2
Gotcha all the xenophobic racist mofo
Hope appropriate action will be taken against them to discourage such behaviors that threaten Singapore social cohesion and national security interests.
Antisemitic hate speech should be targeted too if you ask me.
straitstimes.com/singapore/5…
An excerpt from a post by a fellow Singaporean online:
“What makes me unhappy and worried is not the packed trains and the increasing number of new immigrants whom I welcome but how much people are whining. These people question our government more than they question themselves and the oppositions have a big role in shaping these people into who they are today.
Singapore is a vulnerable country. Without a good government and one united people, it is a matter of time it will be reduced to a sorry state.”
And I agree 200%.
Singapore is a country governed by the Rule of Law.
We are also a multicultural country and we are not only proud of that, we will defend it as it is the core and foundation of our Nation.
One can choose to believe in whatever they want - but do not impose it on others or threaten our social cohesion.
Action has consequences, far more than just being punished for breaking the law.
straitstimes.com/singapore/s…
“The last thing Palestinians need is more denial from the left. The Palestinian national project has a rare chance to evolve toward nation-building, peace and coexistence alongside a Jewish Israel that is not about to be exterminated. Chants of “from the river to sea” and the like are destructive conceits.”
-@afalkhatib
