I recruited spies. Now I recruit facts. Service-Disabled Marine. Retired CIA. Writing about fiscal federalism, lawfare, and the myths dividing America.
Washington, DC
Joined April 2023
- Tweets2.3K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.2K
- Likes28.3K
Pinned Tweet
I spent a career recruiting spies and running operations for the United States government. I know how myths are built, how facts are selected, and how the story you’re told is never the complete one.
That’s what I write about now — applied to the country I served.
The framework is called WAPFA: “Which Americans Pay for America?” WAPFA is a fiscal and legal lens, not a party. Two ledgers, one question beneath every major political fight:
-Who actually pays?
-Who actually receives?
-Who controls the story about both?
Urban centers and rural regions each carry real grievances. Both sides select real facts. Both sides omit the ones that complicate their myth.
WAPFA doesn’t pick a side. It shows you the ledger.
Three areas I focus on:
-Fiscal federalism — the real flows of money between states and Washington, and who politicians mislead about them.
-Lawfare — when legal process stops being accountability and becomes a political weapon. I’ve watched both up close.
-Propaganda mechanics — how narratives harden into the only truth people will accept, and what that costs the country.
I’m a permanently and totally disabled Marine. A retired CIA Operations Officer. I’m not building a career. I’m building a record.
Full archive: digitalgunny.substack.com
Follow if you want the ledger, not the legend.
Two charts that have already been checked, stacked together. Neither one shows a stolen election.
The Virginia table: the first row gives Biden 1,234,567 votes and Trump 1,212,121. Those aren't counts; they're number patterns. The totals don't match Virginia's certified result, and it's 2020 anyway. It says nothing about 2026.
The 15% band: the formula was built from the same races it's tested on, so of course it fits.
Stacking two weak claims doesn't make one strong one. If 2026 was stolen, the proof will be in the ballots: recounts, audits, canvasses. That's where to look.
SMOKING GUN: New Report Reveals Algorithmic Pattern on How Dems “Stole” the 2026 Election — Eerily Similar to the Impossible 2020 “Drop and Roll” Pattern Witnessed Across the US thegatewaypundit.com/2026/11…
This chart can't show the election was rigged. Its test would pass almost any set of numbers.
The 0.85 formula and the "range" were both built from these same 30 races, and then the races were checked against them. That's like writing the answer key from the students' answers. Almost everyone passes. Add up the "off by" column in the table and the misses cancel out to zero, which is what a formula fitted to the results does.
A rig and a wave look the same on this chart, because both move races together. What tells them apart is paper: recounts, audits, and canvasses that check ballots against machine totals. That's where to look.
Kansas split its ticket. On the same ballots, Democrats lead for Senate, governor and attorney general, and Republicans lead for secretary of state, treasurer and insurance commissioner. A rig for Democrats that hands Republicans half the statewide offices is a strange rig.
Your table shows only Republicans. Put the Democrats back. Hamilton got 561,143 votes for Senate. The Democrat for treasurer got 479,827. About 81,000 Kansans voted for a Democrat for Senate and someone else for treasurer. That's where the Republican treasurer's extra votes came from.
And the Senate race drew the most votes of any race in Kansas: 1,099,896. Treasurer drew 1,083,301. Stuffed ballots would push those totals up. They went down.
Kansas did the same thing in 2022: a Democratic governor, and Republicans for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer.
Source: Kansas SOS unofficial results, ent.sos.ks.gov/statewide.htm…
Election fraud: Kansas Republicans cast more votes for Treasurer, and Insurance Commissioner, than their US Senate and Governor seats. Really? I don't think so.
The pattern continues like Texas, North Carolina and Ohio, North and South Carolina, Georgia (see previous tweets).
@FSociety_1942 found this unholy pattern, help him out at his give-send-go link at the top of his X page.
@realDonaldTrump @AGToddBlanche Kansas:
More claims going around. Same test: what does the number actually measure?
"Republicans kept only 85% of Trump's share everywhere, so it's an algorithm." A national wave moves every state by about the same share. That's what waves look like. 2018 did it too.
"Exit polls show 93% of Republicans voted Republican, so nobody crossed over." Both can be true. Loyalty measures how Republicans who voted split, not how many voted. If some Trump voters stayed home, the share drops with no crossover at all.
"Vote tables show impossible drops." Check whether the table matches the state's certified results. Vote counts are whole numbers. A table with decimal votes isn't election data.
Ask what the number measures before you ask what it proves.
Three midterm claims are going around. Each starts with a real number.
"Democrats materialized 20 million new votes." The chart's own footnote says the 2026 bars are projections from 85% of the count, not counted votes. And midterm surges happen: Democratic House votes rose 25 million from 2014 to 2018.
"20,283,937 registered without citizenship checks." That's the federal survey's count of new registrations, 2022–2024. A move between counties counts. It doesn't measure citizenship.
"More registered voters than citizens in 12 states." Federal law keeps unconfirmed addresses on the rolls for two federal elections. In those 12 states, that's 5.3 million names.
What the record does show: in most states the citizenship check is a signature, and nobody counts how often it fails.
teapawt.net/digitalgunny/status/21…
An update on the "20 million new Democratic votes" chart. The account that says it made the chart now writes that the 2026 figures were "made up by me based on the given data at the time," and that Democrats will likely land at 67–69 million. That's a revised forecast, not a count.
When a claim is built from several of these charts at once, test each piece on its own. Every one has a plain explanation: registrations aren't citizenship checks, projections aren't counts, uniform shifts are what waves look like.
Certified totals arrive in mid-December. That's the number that settles it.
Three midterm claims are going around. Each starts with a real number.
"Democrats materialized 20 million new votes." The chart's own footnote says the 2026 bars are projections from 85% of the count, not counted votes. And midterm surges happen: Democratic House votes rose 25 million from 2014 to 2018.
"20,283,937 registered without citizenship checks." That's the federal survey's count of new registrations, 2022–2024. A move between counties counts. It doesn't measure citizenship.
"More registered voters than citizens in 12 states." Federal law keeps unconfirmed addresses on the rolls for two federal elections. In those 12 states, that's 5.3 million names.
What the record does show: in most states the citizenship check is a signature, and nobody counts how often it fails.
teapawt.net/digitalgunny/status/21…
Three claims about the midterms are going around today. Each takes a real number and gives it the wrong meaning.
“20,283,937 illegally registered.” That’s the federal survey’s count of new registrations, 2022–2024. A move between counties counts. It says nothing about citizenship.
“Democrats got 20 million more votes.” The chart’s own footnote says the 2026 bars are projections, not counted votes.
“More registered voters than citizens.” Federal law makes states keep unconfirmed addresses on the rolls through two federal elections. In those 12 states, that’s 5.3 million names.
What the record does show: in most states, the citizenship check is a signature, and nobody counts how often it fails.
teapawt.net/digitalgunny/status/21…
This chart comes from @TheSCIF, whose version explains the “20 million” as 20,283,937 voters “illegally registered without U.S. citizenship.”
That number is the federal survey’s count of new registrations, 2022–2024. A move between counties counts. It says nothing about citizenship.
And the chart’s own footnote says the 2026 bars are projections, not counted votes.
What the record shows: teapawt.net/digitalgunny/status/21…
His graphic says 2022–2024. His text says 2022 to 2026. Neither counts noncitizens: 20,283,937 is the federal survey’s count of new registrations, and the survey counts a move between counties as one.
What the record does show, and what nobody is counting, is here:
teapawt.net/digitalgunny/status/21…
Exposing where 20 MILLION more Democrat voters illegally came from and the algorithms put in place to rig the 2026 midterm elections.
2022 Voter Count:
🟥Rep: 54.2M
🟦Dem: 51.3M
2026 Voter Count:
🟥Rep: 55.6M
🟦Dem: 70.4M
Republicans gained a little over a million. But...
If you add all of the voters illegally registered without U.S. citizenship from each state from 2022 to 2026, you get around 20,283,937, which is right around the ridiculous number of voters that Democrats what you to believe that they legally gained, that NOBODY is buying.
On top of this you have the algorithms put in place to give Democrats an advantage for every vote. So each state does NOT cheat in the same exact way due to different laws, equipment, and a multitude of variables.
This is where these algorithms come into play, which were first intoduced in the early 2000s from Clinton Curtis who designed the 51% to 49% algorithm to rig elections.
These type of algorithms do not attribute 1 vote per 1 vote. In fact, 1 vote could equal MORE or LESS, .75% per vote/1.25% per vote, etc., giving candidates a massive lead or disadvantage for literrally every vote attributed.
Today you are seeing races in specific states have ALL the same outcome, for example, every CA election magically ended in a 53% to 46%, favoring Democrats.
Or a graph that has been circulating showing a 15% band or advantage given to one party or candidate per race, showing that these algorithms are still in place, just with different numbers and percentages attributed and added to the scripts to run these algorithms to steal elections.
None of this is new, it's just getting more advanced and harder to detect as some of the scripts can erase themselves when they complete their task, hiding all and any evidence that it even existed, leaving an audit completely useless.
It's time to wake up ladies and gentleman, we are closer than ever to losing this country, and if they manage to gain even more power, they will make sure we never win another election ever again and this country will fall, and the rest of the world will follow.
Speak up, stand up, and fight back for the truth and accountability.
The Pipeline: an assessment of National Security Action. Its roster staffed an administration. It ran ads, lobbies Congress, and won’t say who runs it.
The worse it gets, the more you need to get out and vote. My opinion: you will see outlandish polls of how the red team is losing now through tomorrow to try and keep the red team home. This is noise. Turn up your music and cast your ballot.
The Democracy Files — @DataRepublican archive — have been argued about for two weeks. @GrumpyTechBro and I published the version the IC would have to write.
The plan is real. The trigger is not theirs to pull. And the governors have not said they will.
teapawt.net/GrumpyTechBro/status/2…
The Democracy Files — @DataRepublican's archive — have been argued about for two weeks. @GrumpyTechBro and I published the version the IC would have to write.
The plan is real. The trigger is not theirs to pull. And the governors have not said they will.
teapawt.net/GrumpyTechBro/status/2…
Thank you for laying this all out for us. Great work!
I promised my take on @DataRepublican's document dump, here it is.
If you are tired of being told the only choices are “nothing to see here” or “the whole thing is already a conspiracy,” this is the middle path written by someone who indexed the documents, followed the money until the donor-advised fund stopped him, and still refuses to invent the missing sentence. It is long because the distinctions matter, and short on the parts that cannot be shown. Read it if you want the receipts that exist and a clear label on the ones that do not.
teapawt.net/GrumpyTechBro/status/2…
“...they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death...”
— 2 Nephi 2:27 (Book of Mormon)
A dying father’s last teaching to his sons, and the series ends where it began: with an offer and a choice. Every witness in these sixteen weeks documented a system that wanted the choice made for you — by the Party, the planner, the Candidate, the sign in the shop window. This text refuses. It does not tell you what to choose. It says the choosing is the point — that it cannot be taken, and it cannot be delegated. Two days from now this country makes choices of its own. This series doesn’t tell you what they should be. It never did.
The verdict was always yours. (Rival Faith, 16/16)
“…but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
— George Orwell, Animal Farm (1945), ch. 10, closing paragraph
Sixteen weeks of witnesses, one lesson — the mechanism survives the change of flags. That’s why the field guide matters more than the jersey.
The verdict is yours. (The Witnesses, 16/16)
