
Advocate for dialogue over division | Cross-examined PM Trudeau | Still asking: When did the gov’t become so afraid of its own citizens? | Founder @empoweredca
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined April 2015
- Tweets57.8K
- Following2.3K
- Followers122K
- Likes58.5K
Pinned Tweet
I am beyond excited to announce that "Reconnect to Canada" is now available for purchase on Amazon!
Let's elevate our country together by getting your copy today!
➡️ Get your copy here: a.co/d/8hkNWfz
I will be holding an X Space later today to chat about this and more. Stay tuned for details!
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
Well said! Nothing seems to make sense. It has to be intentional. The level of manipulation is overwhelming. Climate change is going to kill us, men competing in women’s sports, open borders, suicidal empathy. It’s like the world is going crazy.
This post brilliantly captures what I mean when I say we are living in an upside down world, particularly this passage:
“The second is reality. Exploding debt, collapsing public services despite record taxes, rising insecurity, schools that no longer teach anything. You can lie about reality for decades. You can’t stop it from arriving.”
What stands out is the contradiction between the future we are being sold and the conditions we are actually living in. Less ownership is presented as progress. More dependence as security. More centralized control as the solution to failures under the people already in control.
And when those promises collapse, the people responsible demand even more of our money and more power over our lives. Their failures become the justification for expanding their authority, while our freedom to own, build and decide for ourselves becomes something we are expected to surrender. Why should their failure cost us our freedom?
We are being fed a lie and expected to call it progress. I refuse to pretend that losing more and expecting less is a better future.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
Dear Canadians
Use your own eyes and try to honestly say Eva is wrong.
This post brilliantly captures what I mean when I say we are living in an upside down world, particularly this passage:
“The second is reality. Exploding debt, collapsing public services despite record taxes, rising insecurity, schools that no longer teach anything. You can lie about reality for decades. You can’t stop it from arriving.”
What stands out is the contradiction between the future we are being sold and the conditions we are actually living in. Less ownership is presented as progress. More dependence as security. More centralized control as the solution to failures under the people already in control.
And when those promises collapse, the people responsible demand even more of our money and more power over our lives. Their failures become the justification for expanding their authority, while our freedom to own, build and decide for ourselves becomes something we are expected to surrender. Why should their failure cost us our freedom?
We are being fed a lie and expected to call it progress. I refuse to pretend that losing more and expecting less is a better future.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
In politics, many talk about building a “big tent.”
A wise man once described that to me as “lying a little bit to everyone.”
It may be the most accurate description of politics I have ever heard.
I see this time and time again, especially on the right. They seem to believe that the way to win more votes is to appeal to everyone, compromising their principles, softening their convictions and telling each group what it wants to hear.
Meanwhile, the left rarely does this. They double down on their convictions, convinced of their own righteousness, regardless of the issue.
News flash: the right’s approach is not working!
People are tired of politicians who try to stand for everything and therefore stand for nothing.
Be clear about your values. State your goals. Defend your principles. And do not waver whenever the political winds change.
You do not earn trust by trying to be everything to everyone.
You earn it by standing firmly for something and giving people a reason to come to you.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
🎯🎯🎯CANADIANS
MUST READ
I honestly do not know what to say about the nonsense unfolding in front of us every single day.
People are up in arms about Alberta sovereignty while warning that Alberta is about to become the “51st state”, something literally no one is advocating.
Meanwhile, our Prime Minister, who spent much of his career and life outside Canada, appears determined to tie Canada ever more closely to communist China and now an economically struggling European Union. Not exactly something Canadians were talking about or asking for!
And what are closer ties with another continent, or with China, actually going to do for ordinary Canadians?
Will they fix our crumbling roads? Reduce hospital wait times? Make life more affordable? Improve the public services Canadians already pay far too much for?
And somehow, Canadians are still standing around with their “elbows up,” flapping like chickens while closing their eyes to the mess directly in front of them.
Our institutions are failing. Accountability has disappeared. People are divided. Governments spend more, deliver less and blame everyone but themselves, then expect to be congratulated when they manage to do the jobs they were elected and paid to do!
Yet anyone who questions whether this system still serves Canadians is called dangerous or extreme. Anyone advocating for a better future for the next generation is called a traitor.
Are we serious here?
Or are Canadians deliberately refusing to see what is directly in front of them because admitting that Canada is broken is simply too uncomfortable?
You cannot fix a country by closing your eyes, flapping your elbows and pretending everything is fine.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
This.
I’m not sure how many times I need to say this, but citizens are not to blame for asking questions and challenging the status quo.
People are entitled to challenge the status quo, question government decisions and expect answers from those in power. That is part of living in a free and open democracy.
If our public institutions are failing the public, directing anger at the people pointing it out does nothing to fix the problem. Neither does labelling, shaming or lecturing them into silence.
Public trust has to be earned through actions. Start by listening, acknowledging what has gone wrong and taking responsibility.
Citizens asking questions are doing their part. Those entrusted with power need to do theirs.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
Pay attention to Eva Chipiuk's commentary about today's decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to hear the federal government's appeal over its invocation of the Emergencies Act.
🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court of Canada will hear the federal government’s appeal over its invocation of the Emergencies Act.
Two levels of court. Four judges. All found that the federal government acted outside its legal authority.
Yet the government has decided to spend more taxpayers’ money fighting those rulings, all the way to the Supreme Court.
When this began with extraordinary emergency powers used against citizens protesting government policy, we really have to question what the government is spending public money to defend: the public interest, or its own power to silence political opposition?
What is the value to Canadians? What is the point? How does this serve the public?
Why must citizens spend years paying to challenge government overreach in court, while also funding the government’s lawyers through their taxes? Why is it so hard for government to respect people’s rights and do the right thing in the first place? How is any of this reasonable or fair?
Canadians are left paying both sides of a legal battle that should never have been necessary. Imagine if the government put that same effort and those resources into serving the public.
Doesn’t that sound nice?!
Take note, Canada. This should not even be controversial.
Injuries happen. Nothing is 100% safe or effective. The least our governments can do is help those harmed.
Instead, the injured have been abandoned by the very governments that demanded their compliance.
This week, I joined @NIHDirector_Jay, @DrOzCMS, and @DrSchwartzCDC at NIH to open a historic clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination.
We must listen to patients and families who report vaccine injuries—not dismiss or gaslight them. President Trump and I are building a health system that takes them seriously, follows the evidence, and uses what we learn to make vaccines safer.
This is how we earn back trust in our public health institutions.
I don’t understand the entitlement.
Poland has laws.
You must follow them.
What is so difficult to understand?
Illegal Migrants complain that they are not allowed to cross the Polish border:
“We want to enter Poland, but they won’t let us. They are threatening to harm us if we try to cross over. I want to go to Poland or Germany to have a good life.”
Poland says NO to Open Borders! 🇵🇱
Every country needs to be like Poland
And just like that, it’s over and it’s a clear win for the Conservatives in BC.
globalnews.ca/news/12112175/…
Watch here👇
LIVE: Juno News BC Election Night Broadcast xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1oKMvNonw…
This post brilliantly captures what I mean when I say we are living in an upside down world, particularly this passage:
“The second is reality. Exploding debt, collapsing public services despite record taxes, rising insecurity, schools that no longer teach anything. You can lie about reality for decades. You can’t stop it from arriving.”
What stands out is the contradiction between the future we are being sold and the conditions we are actually living in. Less ownership is presented as progress. More dependence as security. More centralized control as the solution to failures under the people already in control.
And when those promises collapse, the people responsible demand even more of our money and more power over our lives. Their failures become the justification for expanding their authority, while our freedom to own, build and decide for ourselves becomes something we are expected to surrender. Why should their failure cost us our freedom?
We are being fed a lie and expected to call it progress. I refuse to pretend that losing more and expecting less is a better future.
I've been saying it for months: we're heading toward a new 1989.
Not the fall of the Berlin Wall this time. The fall of the globalist project, and its fundamentally collectivist vision of humanity.
Remember the video Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum published in 2016, the "predictions for 2030." Prediction number one: "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy." You'll own nothing, rent everything, and smile about it. They presented it as a desirable future. Marx summed up communism in a single sentence: the abolition of private property. The WEF just rewrote it with a delivery drone.
Their problem is that two forces are now tearing this project apart.
The first is AI. For the first time in history, a single individual can own a lever of production that used to require an army of employees, a bank, and a state. AI doesn't centralize capital. It hands it to the people who build. That is the exact opposite of "you'll own nothing."
The second is reality. Exploding debt, collapsing public services despite record taxes, rising insecurity, schools that no longer teach anything. You can lie about reality for decades. You can't stop it from arriving.
So here's what they're going to do now.
First, activate their networks. Soros's foundations, starting with Open Society, have spent years pouring money into NGOs, activist collectives, and "anti-repression" groups that form the ideological and logistical breeding ground of the crowds we're seeing today from Paris to Montreal. When the argument no longer works, all that's left is chaos.
Second, manipulate the youth. This is how communists have always taken power. Mao, speaking to Chinese students in 1957: "The world is yours. You young people are like the sun at eight or nine in the morning." Nine years later, he unleashed the Red Guards: high schoolers and university students who humiliated their teachers, denounced their parents, and burned books. And once they were no longer useful, he shipped some 17 million of them off to the countryside to be "re-educated." Youth is always the fuel of the revolution. Never its beneficiary.
Third, the globalist elites will do everything they can to keep the chaos going. Because a country in chaos demands more state, more control, more surveillance, more "governance." Chaos isn't a bug in their project. It's how it runs.
But either way, their project has only two possible endings. Neither one goes their way.
Ending one: political Islam. They think they can use it as an ally against the West, against the nation, against the family. They forgot Iran. In 1979, the Iranian left, led by the communists of the Tudeh Party, marched hand in hand with Khomeini to overthrow the Shah. Four years later, the party was banned, its leaders in prison, many of them executed. Islamism never lets itself be used by Marxism. It devours it. Your Marxist project will end up eaten by the very people you thought you were manipulating.
Ending two: economic collapse. Because let's say it plainly: the elites running this project are, on the whole, economically illiterate. Brilliant at storytelling, hopeless at incentives. Ludwig von Mises proved it back in 1920: without private property there are no prices, without prices there is no economic calculation, and without economic calculation there is only waste and shortage. Hayek drove the point home: no central planner can aggregate the dispersed knowledge of billions of people. Global collectivism can't work. Not because it's been badly implemented. Because it is structurally impossible.
The USSR learned that in 1989. They're about to learn it now.
The wall is already shifting.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
Alberta's employment numbers are going to jump in next month's Stats. Canada report because Elections Alberta had to hire 20,000+ part-time workers.
Carney will brag that he's creating jobs.
Smith will brag that she's creating jobs.
The CBC will brag that Canada is on the right track.
And Nenshi will lament the fact that Edmonton wasted money hiring 20,000+ government employees.
Let that sink in.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
Replying to @echipiuk
APP should not be introduced as a replacement to CPP, but as an alternative option .... provincial workers are automatically enrolled, the rest can choose which they want to contribute to .... don't need a referendum for this ..... just Smith's unwillingness to do anything ....
Albertans deserve to know how much they contribute to the pension plan and how those funds are distributed. The federal government’s refusal to share that information with Albertans and their provincial government flies in the face of transparency and accountability.
This is money Albertans have worked for and contributed. They should not have to fight for basic information about it. An informed public discussion requires clear answers and access to the numbers.
The Western Standard's Derek Fildebrandt interviewed Premier Danielle Smith on Friday October 23.
In this clip the Premier states that she believes an Alberta Pension Plan would have failed on the recent referendum ballot.
"Someone needs to be out there making a case for why it is that we would be better off with an Alberta Pension Plan."
She erroneously credits Alberta Prosperity Project for this effort, when it was actually @ABfirstpension who hit the road and held informative town halls in an effort to inform the public about the incredible benefits an Alberta Pension Plan would bring to our province.
Why did these town halls stop happening? Lack of funding! It was 100% a volunteer effort.
Maybe the government should take some responsibility to do more of that educating?
Why wouldn't every worker and employer in Alberta NOT want to keep more of their hard earned money?
Just a thought.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM retweeted
The total number of polls to report according to Elections Alberta have now dropped to 5,537. And the total number of votes in favor of having a referendum have dropped from 519K to 514K with 5,522 polls reporting. Independence voters reduced from 25.1% of the vote to 25%. FYI
























