Freedumb4U

The abortion debate is set upon a subjective standard and needs to be changed with the following: The current standard is subjective and based on the mother's intent and only the woman's rights. If she doesn't want it, it's a clump of cells. If she does, it's a developing baby. There is no consideration to the rights of the father or fetus. This is a terrible standard and needs to be replaced with the following: 1. Objective Standard of Abortion A) Biologically and scientifically, a human life is measured from conception to death, everything in between is simply a stage of development. A fetus is a human. If a fetus is having complications, a medical doctor specialist addresses the issue. A medical doctor is for humans. B) The killing of a human is a homicide. That doesn't mean it's murder, though it could be. In rare cases of threat of the life of the mother, an abortion could be seen as self-defense. C) Now, the discussion of whether it is justified can be had. Is it conception, heartbeat, cognitive pain reception, or up to birth? This is the proper format for discussing the issue. If abortion is deemed legal and acceptable in some form, the following needs to be addressed... 2) Party Rights A) In almost all cases, a father was a consenting party to the conception. He should have the right to be not only in the conversation but also a deciding party. If there is a disagreement, where one wants the abortion and the other doesn't, they can form a contractual agreement, just like in any parenting situation. B) Fetus rights. When do they attach? Conception or along the development line? That needs to be discussed so the issue can be figured out. Perhaps a guardian ad litem might have to be involved.

💯 truth