I always enjoy the content you share on X, but we’re not connected yet. I’ve tried several times to follow you, but for some reason it isn’t going through. If you don’t mind, could you try connecting from your side?❤️🇺🇸🚀
I always enjoy the content you share on X, but we’re not connected yet. I’ve tried several times to follow you, but for some reason it isn’t going through. If you don’t mind, could you try connecting from your side?❤️🇺🇸🚀
Gino Marcon retweeted
South Australia is only able to generate about half its demand this morning, mostly with gas & rapidly depleting batteries. It is buying coal fired electricity from interstate.
Yep, the renewables poster child is proving that renewable energy sucks & costs a mozza.
Gino Marcon retweeted
Last night I spoke to Chris Kenny on @SkyNewsAust about how the renewable energy transition is turning into a nightmare. In particular, the blowouts in transmission costs, which mean renewables simply cannot be low-cost.
youtu.be/ctbD7l8G2oE?si=OZ32…
Gino Marcon retweeted
Energy independence?
35% of Australia's energy consumption come from oil (mostly imported). Demand is only increasing.
energy.gov.au/energy-data/au…
The market decided it was cheaper to import than produce and refine, but that doesn't mean it was the right thing to do for Australia.
She loses the argument because old lefty got caught out. So she blocks. 😆 🤣
Gino Marcon retweeted
Stop showing these monologues and interviews. I want to see all the shots. More golf less talk.
If you could calculate the per capita malinvestment in energy my guess is Australia would be the world leader and not Germany or the UK.
Gino Marcon retweeted
Missed this one did you bud? This is a two and a half year trial done right here in Australia. Do you think it would be parked if it was better? abc.net.au/news/2026-04-02/e…
Gino Marcon retweeted
**“No legal impediment”? Pull the other one, Quentin.**
Australia sits on vast untapped oil reserves yet imports 80-90% of its refined fuel, with strategic stocks at a pathetic 30-40 days — leaving us completely exposed every time global supply hiccups.
The real barriers aren’t “commercial risk” — they’re years of suffocating green tape, duplicated federal and state approvals, endless activist lawsuits, and a policy regime that treats fossil fuel projects like environmental sins while fast-tracking renewables.
Taxpayers are already underwriting the entire energy mess: billions in diesel credits for fossils plus billions more in mandates, guarantees and handouts for renewables. Yet you pearl-clutch at the idea of giving domestic fuel security a fair go?
Rennick isn’t asking for corporate welfare. He’s calling out the ideological sabotage that keeps us dependent on foreign tankers. Your “commercial risk” excuse is just polite code for keep importing while virtue-signalling. National security isn’t optional.