Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Meghan Markle certainly has singular accomplishments.
Aside from the determination she is presently displaying, and has displayed in the past, to twist, turn and exploit everything that happens to her advantage (something she is presently doing as she exploits her father's disgrace to her advantage), she has graduated from being a member of the Royal Family with a platform for doing good for humanity through public service under the umbrella of a respected thousand-year-old institution, to a guest star on an Australian cooking show. This has been by way of several (by her own account) multi-million dollar deals, all of which exploited the status she acquired upon marriage to the detriment of her husband's family, the British people's welcome to her, and race relations within Britain and the Commonwealth, as several diplomats of colour from the Caribbean and Africa had cause to complain to me, a Jamaican born and bred who is, like all Jamaicans irrespective of colour or class, regarded as a fully paid-up member of the Black community.
She has also achieved the distinction of working her way downwards from being one half of one of the most popular and desirable couples on earth to one half of the most unpopular couples in the world.
Along the way, she has been justly accused of being a bully, a ruthless and Macchiavellian conniver with scant regard for the facts, the rights of others or the injury she causes to those she targets, irrespective of their age, rank, relationship to her, or the justice of the victimisation.
Although she and her husband have commended the SS, as their Sussex Squad is popularly known, for their support, neither of them has once called out this latter-day version of its earlier namesake as it seeks, on behalf of the couple, to bully, abuse, intimidate others who are going about their lawful business, as this gaggle of bullies misuse the law with chilling alacrity reminiscent of the earlier (albeit more deadly) squad which also shares the same abbreviated initials.
Indeed, there is the suspicion, born of the Sussexes' support of the SS, that they approve of its activities, even when those activities are gross violations of the rights of others.
In the latest example of the gross misuse of the power ithe SS seeks to acquire for itself, one of them has had the temerity to send me via my agent, with copies sent to ITV (the latter day version of the Ministry of Propaganda headed up by Dame Carolyn McCall, whose irresponsibility to the shareholders was so great that she shoved out her leading star, Piers Morgan, for daring to say that he did not believe a word out of Meghan Markle's mouth during the Oprah Winfrey interview [quite right too: It emerged Meghan's account of the facts contained no fewer than 17 distortions] and Chris Ship, propagandist in chief on the ground - or maybe it would be more accurate to say over the air?) a letter demanding that I cease and desist from saying anything critical of Meghan Markle.
The irony is outstanding that followers of a woman, who complained about being silenced by the family which welcomed her as it had never welcomed anyone before - and who has taken loquacity to such lengths, along with her husband, that we now know what the tip of his and his brother's penis looks like, and what activities they were engaged in when he proposed - remains silent while her enforcers try to silence others who are merely going about their lawful business. She and they can lie as much as they want. They can violate anyone's privacy. But, as far as they're concerned, no one should dare to speak the truth about her or them without them attempting to shut their said victim down.
What Meghan Markle's SS doesn't seem to realise is that this country is not yet Nazi Germany. If Meghan has been wronged by any author, journalist, commentator or broadcaster, she has recourse to the law, a right she and Harry have not hesitated to use on many an occasion as they have sought to silence criticism of their conduct.
She does not have the right to unleash her legion of SS bullies onto people who are exercising their civil liberties in accordance with the rights of all citizens within a democracy, nor do those followers have the right to seek to pervert the purposes of the law for their cult leader's benefit.
If Meghan wants criticism of her to end, she can end it quickly and easily. She can start to behave with the decency and decorum which she should have been employing from the very outset of her advent into a civilised world. She could also try dispensing with her cabal of public relations operatives and stop trying to hog the limelight on what is virtually a daily basis. A ladylike withdrawal from public view for an extended time would be welcomed by all with the possible exception of her, her husband, and their SS followers.
She doesn't frigthen me, nor does her SS band of bullies, though this latest foray, following as it does an earlier one to fraudulently fabricate a GodFundMe account with the objective of accusing me of impropriety, suggests to me that I seem to frighten her and her followers.
Would it be disingenuous of me to ask why, when I have always scrupulously adhered to the facts and her conduct, she or they would fear anything I could say or do, especially as how there are the laws of libel in place (something she and Harry are all too familiar with), yet never once have they had cause to deploy them against me or indeed to complain to me about anything I have ever said or written.
Ah, but I'm forgetting the lessons of history. People who have or support the SS use force to club the innocent into submission when they can't deploy the law against them. And what better time to do so than when she and her equally money-grubbing brother are exploiting the truly ghastly accusations against their father for their own financial and reputational benefit.
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni @mscott
Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice
Dear Professor Scott,
I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust.
You cannot be serious.
You are quoted as saying:
"Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other."
Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic.
My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government.
While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage.
At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live.
People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later.
Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure.
Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking.
I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable.
And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was.
Kind? For whom?
Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods.
And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support.
The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified.
The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings.
While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive.
Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand.
We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on.
Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them.
And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion?
It is sickening.
Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment?
Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them?
Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand?
I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause.
Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences.
I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do...
But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price.
We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up.
Some of those people will never recover what they lost.
And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy.
What an absolute disgrace.
Yours sincerely,
Alia Bland
Co-founder, Voices for Freedom
New Zealand
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
J.K. Rowling could have kept quiet, banked her billions and stayed everyone's favourite author.
She didn't.
She put her name, her reputation and her own money on the line for women.
She founded Beira's Place, a women-only centre in Edinburgh for survivors of sexual violence. She has funded legal fights to protect women's rights and women-only spaces. And she has given a voice to women who were too scared to speak.
For that she has faced years of death threats, rape threats and torture threats.
She hasn't flinched once.
That's not just a literary legend. That's a hero for women everywhere. 👏🇬🇧
John Healey plans to commit £432 million to rough sleeping in his budget.
Why not deport every migrant currently housed in hotels and HMOs?
That way, we could house our own homeless Brits at no extra cost! Brits whose parents and grandparents paid tax all their lives!
Warped ideology drives warped decisions.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Prices in the UK have absolutely lost the plot
£12 for fish and chips
Almost £2 per litre for fuel
£45 for a driving lesson
Over £2 for a bottle of pop
£20 for a takeaway for one person
£20 for a 15 minute taxi
Weekly food shop for one person £80
£100 a night for a "cheap" hotel
Rent prices through the roof
At this point we're just getting robbed.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Extremely serious allegations against the government tonight.
Sir Ben Wallace, the former Defence Secretary, has accused Labour of artificially inflating the defence budget by including security services spending.
This has been done, he alleges, to try and hoodwink Nato that we are on course to meet the commitment of defence spending as 3.5% of GDP by 2030.
DESPITE Nato rules clearly excluding security services in it's measurement.
The UK Statistics Authority is "considering" his complaint.
It doesn't need much consideration. It needs investigating, and if true, those complicit must pay the political price.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Politicians always need someone or something to blame for their own failings.
Just imagine if we elected people with actual competence into high office instead of low grade, low IQ grifters who couldn't manages a carboot stall.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
I'm opening an express clinic where you can Trans yourself in less than an hour. You can literally pop in during your lunch break and be ready to start cheating at sport that same afternoon.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Just look at the Edinburgh Garden of Remembrance. Completely wrecked.
Our poppies and our remembrance are being sneered at more and more.
When people keep talking down the poppy and treating patriotism like something to be ashamed of, it sends a message. In my view, that's giving the vandals a green light.
War memorials defaced. Poppies ripped down. Tributes to our heroes disrespected.
The men and women who died for this country deserve better. Lest we forget means NEVER forget.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Nice to see consultant doctors are going to strike in November.
You know the people earning £113,000 to £150,000 per annum on the NHS. Plus whatever they earn on top for their private work.
While pensioners on less than £13,000 per annum are waiting years for an operation.
Do no harm, eh.
🙄🤬
Earn $27 per song you listen:
have prepared a list of 13 Websites that'll pay you $100/hr for listening the music With Just a Smartphone or Laptop and Internet.
For absolutely FREE:
To get it:
1. Follow Me
2. Like and Retweet
3. Reply with "Send"
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Stunning. A 200 year-old stained glass window of Queen Elizabeth I.
At first glance, this portrait at Melford Hall looks like a pristine Tudor original from her 1578 royal visit, but look closer, because it holds an interesting secret.
The window wasn't made during her reign; it was actually commissioned over 200 years later by the room’s naval owners during the Napoleonic Wars.
Depicting the Queen in the gown she wore to give thanks for defeating the Spanish Armada in 1588, the Victorian family installed it to rally national pride while Britain faced a fresh threat of invasion from across the Channel.
Can't beat a bit of British history.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Newquay Cornwall .. storm Austin / Boelo
I’d be 💩ing myself if I’d been on that boat
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
Vote 🗳️ Reform UK 🇬🇧🩵 please give me a follow and repost if you will vote Reformuk next election comment below 👇🏻🩵🇬🇧🩵🇬🇧🩵#reformuk #votereform.
Helen Grieve 🇬🇧 retweeted
He skipped school, withdrew £200, bought a one-way ticket to London, and disappeared. Nobody has seen him since.
On September 14, 2007, 14-year-old Andrew Gosden left his family home in Doncaster, England, and appeared to be heading to school as usual.
Andrew was a bright teenager with an excellent school attendance record. His family had no reason to suspect that anything was wrong.
But that morning, he never arrived at school.
Instead, he waited until his family had left home, returned to the house, changed out of his school uniform and put on a black Slipknot T-shirt, black jeans and Vans trainers. He also took his PlayStation Portable.
Then he walked to the railway station.
He bought a one-way ticket to London
On his way to the station, Andrew withdrew £200 from his bank account, almost emptying it.
He bought a one-way ticket to London King's Cross. The ticket seller reportedly offered him a return ticket for less than £1 extra, but Andrew declined.
At approximately 9:36 a.m., he boarded a train to London.
He travelled alone, carrying his belongings and playing on his handheld game console during the journey.
The train arrived at King's Cross at around 11:20 a.m. CCTV footage captured Andrew leaving the station about five minutes later.
It was the last confirmed sighting of him.
He was just 14 years old, alone in London, and his family had no idea where he was.
His family discovered he was missing
That evening, Andrew's family expected him to return home from school. When he did not appear, they began searching for him.
They discovered that he had not attended school and eventually learned that he had withdrawn money and travelled to London.
His father, Kevin Gosden, and the rest of the family were desperate for answers.
Andrew had not told them about the trip. He had not arranged a known place to stay, and there was no confirmed evidence that he had planned to meet anyone.
Why had he travelled to London? Did he intend to return home that evening? Had he arranged to meet somebody?
Nobody knew.
The trail went cold
Police investigated possible sightings and followed numerous leads, but none established what happened after Andrew left King's Cross station.
His family continued appealing for information, and missing-person organisations helped keep his case in the public eye.
Andrew had light brown hair, brown eyes and wore strong prescription glasses. He was also deaf in his left ear and had a distinctive double ridge on his right ear. Investigators later released age-progressed images showing how he might look as an adult.
Years passed without a confirmed sighting.
Two men were arrested
In December 2021, police arrested two men on suspicion of offences including kidnapping as part of the investigation into Andrew's disappearance.
The arrests renewed hopes that the case might finally be solved.
However, the men were later released from the investigation. By September 2023, police had confirmed that they had been eliminated from the inquiry.
The arrests produced no answers about Andrew's whereabouts.
What happened to Andrew Gosden?
More than 19 years have passed since Andrew disappeared. He would now be in his thirties.
Investigators know that he left Doncaster, withdrew money, bought a one-way ticket to London and arrived at King's Cross. What happened after he walked out of the station remains unknown.
There is no confirmed evidence establishing whether Andrew was abducted, harmed by someone he met, or deliberately disappeared.
His family has spent years searching for answers, without knowing whether he is alive or what happened to him.
A 14-year-old boy travelled to London alone. A camera recorded him leaving the station. Then every confirmed trace of him disappeared.
Someone may know what happened that day. Even a small piece of information could help investigators understand where Andrew went.
Nearly two decades later, his family is still waiting for answers.


























