Koi.exe retweeted
Insiders know something...
Ahead of the Elysium mainnet launch scheduled for November 9.
Oct 30 : Ansem
Oct 31 : Arthur Hayes
VCs are starting to post about buying kinetiq:native
Alpha spotted by Korean @ingerxyz 🇰🇷
A wallet bought $1M worth of kinetiq:native in just 24 hours today.
Wallet: 0x04e693dbbbfb9ce7111ce1167b1fa76f4eb7409b = a16z-linked wallet.
while everything was selling off during the Binance hack, one wallet bought roughly $1M worth of kinetiq:native.
Arthur Hayes and Zana Ventures, who were early on $PRL, also announced buys that day.
now it turns out this unidentified wallet received a transfer from a wallet believed to be linked to a16z.
that alone doesn’t prove a16z is behind the buying, but it’s an interesting connection.
is a16z buying kinetiq:native?
if confirmed, this could be pretty big.
Koi.exe retweeted
What if you got an onchain alert when the Binance exploiter started selling and shorted all of those tokens on Binance futures?
I checked 64 tokens. 48 were down 60 minutes after the first sell, and the average move across all 64 was -3.16%
> SOPH -16.79%, RSR -12.37%, CVC -11.21%
> REZ +4.11%, NIL +3.40%, BNB +1.65%
You can click each ticker to see the first sell tx on etherscan, the next 60m of futures price action, how it compared to btc, and any additional sells within the hour
binance-exploiter-sale-impac…
Anthropic ($ANTH) has reportedly filed its S-1 with the SEC, with an IPO expected in mid-to-late November.
seeing some takes that, just like $SPCX, a massive IPO could soak up liquidity and put pressure on crypto.
basically, “shorting crypto ahead of Anthropic is free money.”
so i pulled BTC, ETH and SOL charts around the $SPCX IPO.
the weakness started roughly 10 days BEFORE the listing, rather than after.
obviously that doesn’t prove the IPO caused the selloff.
but if liquidity getting pulled into the IPO is the thesis, the positioning and flows ahead of it are probably what matter.
if this plays out, early November is probably when we start seeing it?
You claim that I made $60K trading $ES.
You claim that I withdrew $10K using money earned from an exploit.
Are you willing to place a $1m bet on Polymarket regarding these two claims?
I’ll create the market if you want.
If not, please stop cyberbullying me.
From the team’s lies and ghost accounts to cyberbullying—you’ve won.
I’m happy to share my full account transaction history.
However, the team seems to have deleted the transaction history after a certain point. It’s definitely not a fair exchange. (There is no transaction history prior to January 2026.)
Replying to @ingerxyz
Everyone who lost money on the price exploit have been made whole. Not only were you able to withdraw your original deposit of 20k, you profited around 60k from the exploit.
We gave you the benefit of the doubt and allowed you to withdraw 30k, the remaining 30k will not be eligible for withdrawal.
Despite benefitting from the situation, you continued to spam support, attempted to migrate to bypass the withdrawal block, and are now posting on Twitter without the complete picture.
I thank you for being a supporter on Vest all these years, but if you’re unhappy with the benefits you’ve gotten from the price exploit, you’re welcome to trade elsewhere.
debank.com/profile/0x7fef6ae…
Is this really your Coinbase deposit address? lol
I get the feeling there's some kind of scheme going on here.
@PortalVentures @dotcuriouscat
Is Vest a legitimate exchange?
This is an example of everything that happens when an exchange manages the order book.
If the order book is entrusted to a market maker, the exchange actually has no reason to be involved in any
losses or profits, and
to be honest, once the order book is provided, the exchange has no right to
rewrite it or block withdrawals.
After all, market makers are simply providing their own reasonable price levels to the order book, and traders are conducting transactions with the intention of willingly paying costs such as fees and spreads.
Furthermore, in cases like this, when a loss—rather than a profit—occurs due to an exchange error, it is typically handled with silence.
Vest has already undergone three rollbacks without any explanation.
Please stop bringing up the “ghost account” issue with me. It’s unpleasant and tedious.
@VestExchange @perpv2
I haven't been able to withdraw the money I earned legitimately for over four months now. Haha.
I must have generated over $10 million in trading volume on this exchange.
If this were a legitimate exchange, why wouldn't they let me withdraw this money?
They've even rejected my withdrawal requests.
@VestExchange Please respond as soon as possible. It seems the application process is taking quite a while.
This Data is Lie.
The Nasdaq actually surged pretty high back in June. Haha.
Who hired him? I’m confident enough to make a $1 million bet against this guy.
Vest is a scam?
I trade on Vest every single day, so when a post calling it a scam hit 48K views I didn't just scroll past. I pulled every trade Vest printed from Oct 15 to 25. All 1,076,408 fills, straight from Vest's public trade history.
That post looked at two things: price and time. It never looked at what actually traded. So here's the part it left out, minute by minute.
teapawt.net/esytradez/status/21147…
been watching kinetiq:native lately. this wallet has bought over $600k in the past 3 days.
what caught my eye is the order flow. it keeps placing limit bids and absorbing repeated sells from a small group of traders.
Arkham also shows an “OTC” label. could be a negotiated transfer being executed through the order book, though neither the label nor the flow proves that.
the wallet has already bought around $2.5m worth of kinetiq:native, with its holdings now valued at roughly $3.8m.
at the very least, there’s a buyer putting serious size to work at these levels.
could be a conviction play ahead of the Elysium L2 mainnet launch expected in early November.
Koi.exe retweeted
A 1.5 sharpe crypto short strategy you can trade today
Every few days, Upbit lists a new coin against the Korean won. Within hours it is often up 20%, 40%, sometimes more than 100%. On Binance too.
A lot of the time, it then gives it back. I tested whether you can short that give-back on Binance perps, after fees and funding.
$EWZ went from $46 to $40 during the Brazilian election.
one wallet was $1.6m long and lost $200k in 30 minutes.
this is supposed to be a country ETF? lol
@hypurrdash
Koi.exe retweeted
🇰🇷 CONFIRMED: South Korea’s presidential office has decided to delay the crypto tax that was set to start Jan 1, 2027.
Korea is heating up again. Time to watch the Korean market 🔥
official : n.news.naver.com/article/011…


































