julz retweeted
🚨 See those annoying blue lines?
Those are college students, graduate students, and young Americans 18-25. The new generation of voters.
Support for Marxism and communism is now at 42% among that age group, That number is unprecedented in our nation.
It's spiked in the last 16 months. That 42% came out of the woodwork during the midterms, which helped to drag these monsters across the finish line in red states.
Support for the assassination of ANYONE who disagrees with them politically is now at 45%.
That number has risen 17 points in the last year.
Let me say that again: Since Charlie Kirk was murdered, the support among millions of young Americans in favor of more assassinations with people you politically disagree with has gone up 17 points... IN ONE YEAR.
Countless professors on federally funded campuses call for more bloodshed. There are days when I cannot keep track of all the professors inciting violence.
I am deadly serious when I ask this question: How does Linda McMahon still have a job?
This isn’t personal. It’s business. It’s survival.
If these numbers happened under Joe Biden, or God forbid a Harris presidency, MAGA would be screaming.
Colleges are no longer just a business where reducing paperwork or ensuring college coaches and athletes earn more money should be the priorities.
$79 billion was handed to the Department of Education 10 months ago. And these are the results?
I'll be blunt: This administration has a MASSIVE generational blind spot. I don’t want to use the term “boomer,” but the generational disconnect is becoming more glaring by the day.
The more frightening thought is that I honestly believe President Trump has no clue what’s going on at these universities because the so-called “gatekeepers” aren’t telling him.
If he looked at my timeline for one week, he'd never stop throwing up.
It’s long past time to put people with national security and counterterrorism experience in charge of the Department of Education.
At the very least, dedicate an entire floor to experienced teams who can easily target extremist networks and foreign influence operations on federally funded campuses.
@POTUS
@StephenM
julz retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
anyone in the area please help Joey and the dogs
All the individual tickets for our gala on December 5 are now sold out. Right now, we have Tier 3 tickets and the tables available. All registrations are tax deductible so if you work for a company, tell them to sign up for a table for the gala (or if you roll like that individually you can buy a table too!!). If you sign up for the table with me, I will give you all the behind the scenes info from over the past three years 👀. This gala will help us save more dogs that are abandoned, neglected, and abused, like this entire family that we rescued from an SRO near Skid Row after they were abandoned for a week. The link to sign up for the gala or to solely make a donation is in the link tree in my bio. Go to my profile bio and click on the first link!
julz retweeted
Take it from Rush, and take it from Charlie:
“We are not sunk yet. We will never surrender… it’s not who we are. It’s not what we do.”
If this is true someone should look into it.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
julz retweeted
I witnessed some of this in the battlefield. It is true.
🚨 THIS is the speech that should terrify every American.
Senator Tim Sheehy just dropped the most brutal, unfiltered truth about Iran you’ll ever hear.
For 47 years the Iranian regime has been hunting us — vaporizing Marines, skinning Americans alive on camera, cutting our troops in half with EFPs, and celebrating every death.
They don’t care who you voted for.
They don’t care where you live.
They want every single one of us raped, burned, and cut into pieces.
This isn’t politics.
This is a death cult that has been at war with America since 1979… and we’ve been pretending otherwise.
Watch the full speech.
Every. Single. Second.
Then share it.
Because the regime that did this to our brothers is still standing.
Iran has never paid the real price.
It’s time they do.
julz retweeted
Now that we have the map.
We've established two things.
One: life is a game.
Two: if life is a game, then there are trials, and those trials are hard.
Here is the map of the level we're playing right now.
There are four threats.
The first is a misunderstanding of human nature. Part of the left still believes value is created from the top down: an enlightened planner, directives, experts who know better than you what you need. It's the Bill Gates-style technocratic vision, well-intentioned, blind to how humans actually work. Value can't be decreed. It emerges from millions of free people taking risks, failing, and trying again. Every time we've tried to replace that with a plan, we got less wealth, less freedom, and more resentment.
The second is the players who figured out how to shape institutions without going through the ballot box. The most visible example is George Soros's Open Society: billions poured for decades into NGOs, think tanks, prosecutor campaigns, and open-borders advocacy groups. It's not a secret, it's in their own reports. The problem isn't that a billionaire has opinions. It's that an unelected network can influence justice, immigration, and public debate more than voters can, without ever being accountable when things go wrong.
The third is political Islam. Not Muslims: the political project. And the real reason it can't work is simple: at its core, it's a collectivist project. A single, centralized norm that claims to govern all of life, from law to family to the economy. Every centralized system that has tried to run everything ended the same way. It collapsed under its own weight, because no center can process the information that millions of free individuals process spontaneously. The danger is that when a system collapses, it takes a lot down with it.
The fourth is demographics. The West has stopped having children. A civilization that doesn't reproduce passes on neither its culture, nor its institutions, nor its values. It hands its future to others. It's math, and it's probably the most underestimated threat of all.
Against all this, there's a counterforce. Elon Musk, and more broadly part of the tech world. Builders who understood that civilization isn't guaranteed, that it has to be defended, and that you defend it first by building: rockets, factories, AI, abundance. They have the means, the nerve, and the long-term vision.
Which leaves the real question: how do we keep existing?
Two questions need to be asked.
The first: if a political project requires the destruction of Western values, and democracy is inseparable from the freedom that gave birth to it, is that project compatible with democracy? Popper framed this 80 years ago: a tolerant society that tolerates those who want to abolish tolerance ends up disappearing. Defending democracy doesn't mean letting any project use it to sabotage itself. It means setting non-negotiable rules of the game: freedom of conscience, equality before the law, civil law above any religious law.
The second: how do we make the other players, China, Russia, the countries that still function, understand that the fall of the West is not good news for them? The West isn't just a geopolitical bloc. It's the matrix that produced the scientific method, the rule of law, the industrial revolution, the internet. If that matrix goes dark, it's not a rival disappearing, it's the engine of human progress stalling. And in a world of nuclear weapons, pandemics, and AI, a humanity without a free engine of innovation is taking an existential risk. Everyone has an interest in the West holding.
You are in a game.
The quest is hardcore. But you don't win a game you've already given up on in your head. You have to fight, build, and visualize victory. Those who believe it's already lost deserve to lose. They'll exit history, and others will write it in their place.
After DOGE, Elon came to a conclusion most people missed.
He tried to reform the state from the inside. He failed. And he said it plainly: the government can't fix its own deficit. Nobody in power actually wants to cut. The machine protects itself.
So he drew the only logical conclusion. If the state can't be reformed, there are only two ways this ends.
Either global bankruptcy. Debt keeps compounding, interest payments eat the budget, and the system collapses under its own weight.
Or robots. AI and robotics grow the economy so fast that the debt becomes manageable, and abundance makes the old fights over scarcity irrelevant.
Here's the part almost nobody sees.
For two centuries, capitalism has had a marketing problem. Its gains are real but slow and invisible. 2% growth a year doesn't feel like anything. Your life gets better over 30 years and you never connect it to the system that did it. Meanwhile, the left's promises feel immediate and concrete: a check, a subsidy, a benefit. That's why the left wins on promises even when it can't deliver them. Capitalism produces the wealth, socialism takes the credit.
Robots break that asymmetry.
When productivity doubles in a few years instead of a few decades, people will see it. Things get cheaper, services get better, opportunities appear, in real time. For the first time in history, people will connect capitalism and their rising standard of living directly, almost instantly. The causal chain becomes visible.
And that changes everything politically.
So there are two scenarios.
Scenario one: we stay in the current inertia. No breakthrough, or a breakthrough we regulate to death. The debt wins. Living standards stagnate, then fall. A frustrated electorate turns to whoever promises the most, and that pushes toward a hard collectivist left. But collectivism fails, as it always does. And when it fails, the most organized, most disciplined collectivist force left standing isn't the old left. It's radical Islamism. Bankruptcy, then communism, then something worse.
Scenario two: robots win. Abundance arrives, and it arrives visibly. The link between free enterprise and prosperity becomes obvious to everyone. And this is the key point: it becomes obvious to everyone, including the minorities the left was counting on. Because their long-term incentive is the same as everyone else's. A kid in the suburbs gains infinitely more from a booming, abundant West than from a bankrupt state handing out promises it can't keep. Abundance is the most powerful integration machine ever built.
That's the Western renaissance.
The West doesn't need to win the culture war by arguing. It needs to win it by delivering. And for the first time, it has the technology to deliver fast enough for people to notice.
The race isn't left vs right anymore. It's robots vs bankruptcy.
julz retweeted
Congratulations to the winners of the election. If you don’t know me, my name is Joey Tuccio and I’m an animal rescuer in Los Angeles. If you are new to office, I would love to connect and work with you on how we could all work together to better keep the homeless animal safe. To set the bar of what is appropriate, here is a bulldozer dismantling a puppy mill under a bridge. That’s the type of action we want. Please DM me so we can set a meeting!
And this will be my one nice introductory message and then I get more and more angry from here.
Texas and Oregon statistics show massive voter fraud.
2,900,357 new voters were registered without verification of U.S. citizenship in Texas from 2022 to 2024.
56.5% were considered "valid registrations" even without any verification of U.S. citizenship.
Proof of U.S. citizenship is allegedly not required when registering to vote in Texas. This information can be found on page 193 in the Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report.
On top of this, since 2020, Oregon's population saw an increase of 36,530, which are ALL immigrants from around the world.
BUT, somehow, new registered voters in Oregon saw a gain of 263,459 voters. Which is a 700% gain. What is going on here?
Look at the graph for international immigration that says +56,700.
Then look at the birth to death statistics at -19,500, with a 36,530 population gain. The 36,530 is all, 100% immigrants.
So how does it go from 2020 with 36,000 new immigrants with a total of 263,459 new voters registrations within the same period, while also taking into consideration all the other graphs including death to birth ratios?
Just wait until more states get exposed. None of the numbers, votes, or new registrations, make any sense. I believe they went to big on cheating which made it extremely obvious and exposed their rigged system.
THIS
Every GOP strategist, consultant, and candidate should be forced to participate in a role-playing exercise this morning.
Your name is Bob. You’re a 49-year-old blue-collar worker in Ohio. You’ve always struggled to make ends meet. The good jobs were all shipped to China and the few remaining pay a pittance wage, undercut by endless illegal labor.
You’re a 3x Trump voter because you believed he would finally make America great again.
You put your son through Ohio State. He graduated cum laude in computer science. You couldn’t have been prouder. After months searching, he landed an entry-level job at Microsoft. Beneath his qualifications, but a good start for a smart kid.
Then he got laid off. That same month, Microsoft applied for 150,000 more H-1B visas because it can’t find qualified Americans.
Your son has spent six months back in his childhood bedroom, sending hundreds of applications without landing an interview.
On TV, Trump boasts about the greatest economy in history and how many women and minorities are finding jobs.
You decide a father-son steak night might cheer him up.
Gas is $4.50 a gallon. Filling your truck costs over $100. At Kroger, ribeyes are $30/lb. You settle for hamburger, even though 70/30 ground beef still costs $10+.
At checkout, a fat black woman is screaming at the cashier because her EBT will only cover most of the filet mignon and lobster in her cart.
You think to yourself how the Iran war has made everything expensive, but at least we’re stopping their nuclear bomb. You weren’t even sure where Iran was before you googled it after we first bombed them in March.
After dinner, you take your son to the county fair. Half the people aren’t speaking English. Virtually none of the crowd looks like you. You’re forced to leave early after a “teen takeover” turns violent. A foreign born judge pledges none of them will go to jail.
Back home, you turn on the TV. Vivek Ramaswamy is lecturing the crowd about American mediocrity and why Ohio needs more foreign talent.
Your son grows upset. You change the channel.
Now a Republican surrogate, the daughter of a governor or wife of an elderly billionaire, explains that young White men are the REAL welfare queens. They’d rather play videogames in their parents’ basements than work.
Your son says nothing. He just goes back to his childhood bedroom. You turn off the TV.
Then your neighbor starts blasting reggaeton and cracking open Modelos. He brought his cousin’s family from Mexico to help with all the minority-business contracts his construction firm keeps winning. Tonight they’re celebrating his nephew’s birth, the family’s first birthright American citizen.
You sit alone in your living room.
You worked hard, paid taxes, obeyed the law, and raised your son to do everything right. You voted Republican again and again because you believed somebody in Washington would finally fight for you.
Instead, your wages are stagnant. Groceries are unaffordable. Your community is unrecognizable. Your country is fighting another foreign war.
And upstairs, the son you sacrificed everything for is lying awake in the bedroom he slept in at twelve, wondering what the heck he’s even supposed to do with his life now.
Every time you turn on the TV, the Republicans you elected are either congratulating themselves or explaining why you and your son are the problem.
For ten years, they told you America’s future depended on your vote. Now you aren’t even sure America has a future worth defending.
The Republican Party needs to answer one simple question this morning:
You’ve spent a decade demanding Bob’s loyalty. You’ve given him stagnant wages, unaffordable groceries, another foreign war, and a son who did everything right but can’t find work.
And when they complain, you call them lazy, entitled, and racist.
What possible reason have you given Bob and his son to vote Republican? Do you honestly think you deserve their vote?





































