In case you're interested and have got this far, I'm going to explain how this scam works. The main players are Jane Ruby, Sasha Latypova and Mike Yeadon. These are their roles... Jane Ruby (who committed fraud to bring opioids to children and was involved in the Endopharma scam - see openvaet.substack.com/p/from… and malone.news/p/dr-jane-ruby-o…) pushes out crazy 5G-nanobot-style fake news stories that are lapped up by dissidents. The purpose of those stories is to make people who are concerned about pharma safety (e.g. "antivaxxers") look crazy and/or lacking in discernment. The stories always have an element of truth (e.g. graphene can be made to self assemble, but it's nothing to do with COVID jabs). She started with Stew Peters and now runs her own show bringing on overtly crazy people - as well as her marks (those whom she is buttering up). That taints the mark early on. Sasha also fluffs (butters up, sucks up to) more credible scientists earmarked for targeting (those that are credible, are producing papers or revealing too much information in a credible manner). If they respond well to her approaches they are in the game. If they don't respond with awe and sycophancy (e.g. people like @RWMaloneMD, @JesslovesMJK, @Fynnderella1 and me) they are marked for discrediting and harassment - which is why you see constant attacks on people like Malone (e.g. #sashagate). The ones that entertain her advances then become the subject for discrediting. For example the attempt to undermine @naomirwolf and @jathorpmfm outlined here (arkmedic.info/p/the-miscarri…). Sasha has a strong network of aides and supporters who either didn't vet her inextricable links to pharma (through the Karolinska institute, Pfizer and family ties to the Boston Consulting Group) or turn a blind eye. Sasha is smart and has been playing the PR game for a long time, so even if our scientist mark is genuine they won't know what's going on. The roles of these agents are overtly outlined in IC dogma - it's called MICE (money, ideology, coercion, ego) and you can read all about it here: cia.gov/resources/csi/static… Many of the marks targeted for fluffing ("ego") will be people who haven't achieved very much (e.g. in the field of medical research) and are being fed followers on the basis of their "new finding" that is easily rebutted or discredited by the mainstream, but is allowed to fly on social media because it looks crazy (e.g. spoons sticking to heads from 2021). That reinforces to them that they have something interesting and they believe they are right. It's fake, but the mark enjoys the attention and keeps going. Mike Yeadon's role is to act as pharma's white knight and a pied piper a the same time. The "Ex-Pfizer CEO" (an exaggeration but nobody will bother checking it). It's a sophisticated role, running as "I'm going to expose the dirt on Pfizer" but never does. Instead his real role was to run a useless offshoot company sold for hundreds of millions of dollars through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands. Why? Because if pharma want to pay off doctors as well as hundreds or thousands of social media influencers and harassment trolls they need money. And that money can't come from inside the US, because it's regulated. So they buy a worthless company (e.g. Ziarco - see #Ziarcogate) for hundreds of millions of dollars into a Cayman Islands fund, dump it after a year as a tax write off and then use the money from the Caymans to run their networks, with no questions asked. I know you won't believe that story so please feel free to read the fully referenced and amazingly laid out story here: feesgarden.substack.com/p/wh… A pied piper is someone who recruits lots of (usually dissident) followers and then takes them down a waste of time path. It's yet another method of managing influence copied from the intel community. Mike gained his following promising to dob on Pfizer (but never did) and once he was there, used it to come up with easily debunked and discredited stories about syncytin-1, non-existent respiratory viruses and ivermectin causing worldwide infertility (except in Africa where it's widely available, obviously). So not only do his followers get to be tarred with the "crazy brush" but the stories themselves are used to show to the world that "those crazy anti-science people got it wrong again". Here, for example was the "no syncytin-1 is not in the jabs therefore the jabs must be safe in pregnancy" claim easily sold to the world thanks to Mike's made-up story (see here: theconversation.com/covid-19… and worse here science.feedback.org/review/…). In fact the syncytin-1 fake story was so bad that it was probably the number 1 reason that the government were able to force pregnant women to take the COVID vaccine - and just to ram this point home along came our #Yalegate (non)-friends to kill off the "we are worried about giving novel mRNA therapy in pregnancy" fears specifically debunking Mike's fake syncytin-1 story. I guess that's what a few million dollars in pharma funding buys you, here: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article… So between them, these people - all of whom are either still working for pharma or appear have made deals with pharma or the DOJ - are used to target and discredit their marks. And to finish off the job they then get themselves involved with legal cases that are either: ▶️bound to fail (see here autoimmuneinstitute.org/rese…) - vexatious litigation to stop other people filing credible cases in the same area of law - or ▶️ made to fail (see the Netherlands court case where non-experts in biological warfare such as Latypova, Yeadon and the psychologist Joe Sansone attempted to derail a legal case against Pfizer and Bill Gates with ridiculous "bioweapons" language that was laughed out of court - see here europereloaded.com/in-nether…) And that's the game - it's all about discrediting credible voices and it's been a textbook play of pharma for decades, enshrined in law in the Vioxx scandal (see here archive.li/VZWUt). To be clear, some of those now involved are themselves victims of the scam but continue to play along presumably out of embarrassment at having been hoodwinked by the "yeah I used to work for pharma but now I'm your friend" line. That doesn't give them the right to attack harass and threaten me or any of the other good people fighting for the truth in this pharma shit show. They need to stop. For the rest of us who want truth in science and medicine to be restored, please practice some discernment. If something sounds extreme perhaps escape the social media chamber and ask your normie neighbour what it sounds like to them. And then consider if you are being set up. The "ex-pharma" sycophant who offers you gold and praise is not your friend. Please don't shoot the messenger (again). @Fynnderella1 @JesslovesMJK @JesseMatchey @P_McCulloughMD @FosterCoulson @ThomasWelch15 @RefugeOfSinner5 @DravenS17 @TonyNikolic10 @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @BrokenTruthTV @canceledmouse @SenRonJohnson @BlackTomThePyr8 @RepThomasMassie @SciGuardians @missyTHX1138