New token standards and trends keep appearing, so Picule's launch manager supports more than one ERC20 and ERC721 pair Private tokens, new NFT standards, AI tokens: the DAO and the developer program decide what gets added, so only what the community supports gets built

Nothing launches on Picule until the first sale closes The first project is @picule_family, and the community decides whether the platform opens

One wallet, one NFT at mint. Every payment goes into the pool and stays there Picule is built for collectors, not for flippers

Picule Protocol runs on a custom Uniswap V2 fork, not V3 V3 is hard to automate for a reinvesting fund manager. Stock V2 can’t claim fees without pulling liquidity So we added logic: the fund manager can take only the fee share, never the liquidity Locked liquidity = more trust

On a Picule curve sale the first ETH buys almost twice as many tokens as the last Split your buy into a hundred pieces and you get exactly the same total

Votes on Picule are counted from a snapshot taken when a proposal is created Tokens borrowed or bought after that carry no weight

No team allocation, no VC round, so where does Picule earn? From a slice of swap fees and a 2.5% marketplace fee, never from selling tokens

Good morning web3 If an ICO on Picule doesn't reach its goal, every contributor gets 100% of their ETH back It sits in the sale contract until the sale closes, and there is no function that lets the team withdraw it

On Picule every mint phase is priced on its own: free, a fixed price, or a share of the pool, never above 10% 310 mints take a 10 ETH pool to 16.4 ETH, all of it locked liquidity and none of it to the team

No team allocation. No free bag. If the founder wants tokens, they join the ICO like everyon else

Now you're not just buying a jpeg Every NFT minted on Picule adds liquidity to the token behind it, and that liquidity is locked to your NFT

Picule's developer program is open to anyone holding a protocol NFT. Propose a new token standard, NFT standard, fund manager standard, or ICO sale model to the DAO The ICO side works like this. The core starts with six sale models. Governance can register a seventh through a DAO vote. Each model is its own contract, called through delegatecall, and it checks its own parameters when a sale is created, so a bad curve fails at launch, before anyone sends ETH. Sales that are already running keep the model they started with Token and fund manager standards are checked against a campability table, so a token only launches alongside a fund manager it was approved with Found a better standard or a curve nobody has tried? Bring it to the DAO

but you didnt follow xD

Most launches are built for the first seller. Picule is built for the last holder

no team, no exit liquidity

Crypto has a launch problem. Projects get a pool, a dev wallet, and an exit. Picule Protocol: no team allocation, no VC allocation, liquidity locked forever, and every big decision goes to a DAO vote

there is still some time to wait for it)

Live to test on picule.xyz Come, trade, create, enjoy

You buy a token launched on Picule. Holders vote to migrate liquidity from Dex to a yield vault Your tokens now earn yield automatically. No action needed This is Picule Protocol, where governance actually changes what your tokens do

yes